Join the Fun!

POST

Rita Hayworth

Final score:

33points

POST

Claudia Cardinale

Final score:

29points

POST

Audrey Hepburn

Final score:

26points

POST

Grace Kelly

Final score:

22points

POST

Vivien Leigh

Final score:

21points

POST

Gene Tierney

Final score:

20points

POST

Ingrid Bergman

Final score:

19points

POST

Judy Garland

Final score:

18points

POST

Zoe Hoesley 3 years ago

They made her smile more, what is with people asking women to smile more!

17points

Angharad Eatough 3 years ago

they made her look fake and like a doll, some of these I don't agree with because they are changing their natural beauty

7points

Wolfstar 3 years ago

She looks like a freaking Barbie doll. I know that this post is about how Old Hollywood actresses would look like now, but I absolutely despise this modernized version of Judy Garland. Screw beauty standards.

3points

Nerdy_Tomboy 3 years ago

Agh! The amount of make-up on the second one though! I mean, I guess it’s pretty accurate, but the amount of make-up is just agh and makes the face look “fake” (yes, I know this is a fake image, but you know what I mean). I don’t know, I might be overreacting, but just look at my profile name and you’ll understand.

3points

Blub the fish 3 years ago

She looks...7 years older...

1point

dido74 3 years ago

Nope

1point

Cat_Whisperer 5 months ago

Britney Spears?

0points

Gita Irwin 2 years ago

turning Judy Garland into Britney Spears in this pic.

0points

Donna Leske 3 years ago

The 'modernized' version ignores that you could not get a 16 year old to wear that dress. Modernize the outfit.

0points

hydrostatic joints 3 years ago

I know some 16-year-olds that would love to wear that dress.

1point

Alex 3 years ago

yes

-3points

#10

Bette Davis

Final score:

16points

POST

#11

Sophia Loren

Final score:

16points

POST

#12

Julie Andrews

Final score:

16points

POST

#13

Carole Lombard

Final score:

14points

POST

#14

Katharine Hepburn

Final score:

13points

POST

#15

Ava Gardner

Final score:

12points

POST

#16

Lauren Bacall

Final score:

11points

POST

Brigitte Bardot

Final score:

11points

POST

#18

Joan Crawford

Final score:

9points

POST

#19

Jayne Mansfield

Final score:

7points

POST

#20

Marlene Dietrich

Final score:

2points

POST

Fascinated by music, movies and sitcoms, I'm passionate about social media and can't live without the internet, especially for all the cute dog and cat pictures out there. I wish the day had about 40 hours to be able to do everything I want.

Read less »

My name is Aelita and I have been an Editor for Bored Panda since 2019. I spend my days working with my amazing team and making articles the best they can be. Fantasy and magic have always ruled over my world, from movies to TV shows, to Video Games to tabletop games like Dungeos and Dragons, I try to find magic in every part of my life. Writing is a big part of me too, I hope to publish a fantasy novel one day. I also enjoy playing guitar and singing, as music always help me to get in a great mood. I have an adorable German Shepherd named Hela and we get into all kinds of adventures together.

Read less »

What do you think ?

POST

Julie 3 years ago

Yeah, I hate this. You changed the stunning looks of these classic women for the worse, stripping them of their individuality. The worse was Marlene Dietrich. Sorry that I hate this.

30points

Donna Leske 3 years ago

I agree. Enlarging lips and more hair plus more eye makeup do not result in modernizing a particular person. Perhaps I interpreted the artist's intent wrongly. I believe I thought the effort was to show how they would look today. The title could have been 'How I Would Alter Old-Time Movie Stars'. Still a fun and skillful presentation.

5points

kimberlypelham 3 years ago

Julie +

0points

motojam 3 years ago

Julie what

0points

My Name Here 3 years ago

These women were just fine the way they looked. Why use AI? Can't we just colorize the photos and not have a program change their features and make completely new women out of them? I'm not mad at you, just the whole notion of women adapting to beauty standards set by society, even posthumously.

20points

Catlady6000 3 years ago

I found it fascinating how many of became almost identical to some of today's stars.

1point

keenan_milligan 3 years ago

My Name Here ?

0points

Kuljira 3 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Uncommon Boston Premium 3 years ago

Fail. She isn't Audrey Hepburn anymore. You have changed her natural beauty into the airbrushed, photoshopped fake version popular today -- which nobody likes. Creating a template or definition of attractive is harmful. Instead of seeing individually and imperfections as beautiful, "attractive" is narrowly defined. I couldn't look at the rest.

15points

Uncommon Boston Premium 3 years ago

Sorry. I didn't compliment how skilfully this was done. Regardless of the subject matter, your images are beautiful.

4points

_ 3 years ago

I don't understand why we feel the need to hold things in the past to today's standards.

5points

s. vitkovitsky 3 years ago

I don't even see why we have to hold up things today to today's standards!!! Who decided women have to be glopped over with thst much make-up and fake eyelsshes and big ole hair extensions today? Who hates women that much!?

4points

Fred and George Weasley 3 years ago

honestly this was kinda pointless. no offense, but i hate them all. theyre fine how they are

4points

Mary Maney 3 years ago

I think it looks cool with color, but hey change their looks? They were beautiful ❤️

4points

Sue Knerl 3 years ago

Didn't like most of them. He changed the shape of the face to much and made them look to Barbie like. Not a fan.

3points

NWB 3 years ago

It is a no from me....they were stunning before...just leave it be

3points

Michelle Anderson 3 years ago

OK, every single picture change ruined the unique beauty of these women. The originals were fabulous, the "updated" ones generic.

3points

shadowserpenz 3 years ago

Michelle Anderson +

0points

Sue Prewitt 3 years ago

You can't even tell who some them are in the 'after' pictures. Sorry, Hidreley, but you went too far. Should have modernized their hair and clothes, but not their faces.

3points

Danieletc 3 years ago

I don't use the term, "Why, just WHY?" much, but you earned it, this time.

3points

Hans 3 years ago

This AI seems to have a favour for make-up.

3points

JaxRealEstate 3 years ago

Hans love

0points

Mila S 3 years ago

Regardless whether or not you hate what the AI did, this was just for fun. I think the sheer amount backlash in the comments is unnecessary. It was just to make the older celebrities look more modern. Even though I agree with many of these comments on their individuality, remember that these women wore makeup back then anyway. This was just to see how they would look modern. Now I'm going back to my cup of tea and forget about the hatred of the AI in the comments. Either way, it's just an opinion. I wish no hate on anyone for an opinion.

1point

Maneesh BSN 6 months ago

Placement services actively engage in the recruitment of personnel for various industries and sectors. https://bsnemployment.com/

0points

Maneesh BSN 6 months ago

Business VoIP service providers In this digital era, traditional phone systems have taken a backseat to more innovative solutions, and at the forefront of this revolution stands Business VoIP service providers. https://www.blissfulemergingtechnologies.com/

0points

Maneesh BSN 6 months ago

Satin labels are relatively durable and can withstand washing, making them suitable for clothing and textile applications. https://rudraprints.com/

0points

Bepina 3 years ago

don't like it at all - 'modern' versions all look like they've been airbrushed and just look unnatural, just like the photos of women with zillion filters and adjustments look on Instagram today

0points

Sharon Ingram 3 years ago

It looks like their faces were made narrow and longer, fuller lips....I like the b/w pictures of them better.

0points

chvkarthick 3 years ago

Sharon Ingram follower

0points

Jack Candy 3 years ago

Most of the new pictures are awful. Not more than pretty, but empty faces. The AI almost always makes the eyes bigger (and blue), the lips fuller (as if the AI likes botox), and erases everything that made these women special. The biggest crimes are the new pictures of Lauren Bacall, Marlene Dietrich, Audrey Hepburn, and Katherine Hepburn.

0points

hilly field 3 years ago

I love this! What a fun way to seethese beauties fir todays looks,!!!

0points

hilly field 3 years ago

I love this!

-1point

Mila S 3 years ago

Why the downvotes on @hilly field? It's just an opinion. Here hilly, take my upvote. Why do you deserve downvotes for saying what you think?

0points

POST

Julie 3 years ago

Yeah, I hate this. You changed the stunning looks of these classic women for the worse, stripping them of their individuality. The worse was Marlene Dietrich. Sorry that I hate this.

30points

Donna Leske 3 years ago

5points

kimberlypelham 3 years ago

Julie +

0points

motojam 3 years ago

Julie what

0points

My Name Here 3 years ago

20points

Catlady6000 3 years ago

I found it fascinating how many of became almost identical to some of today's stars.

1point

keenan_milligan 3 years ago

My Name Here ?

0points

Kuljira 3 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Uncommon Boston Premium 3 years ago

15points

Uncommon Boston Premium 3 years ago

Sorry. I didn't compliment how skilfully this was done. Regardless of the subject matter, your images are beautiful.

4points

_ 3 years ago

I don't understand why we feel the need to hold things in the past to today's standards.

5points

s. vitkovitsky 3 years ago

4points

Fred and George Weasley 3 years ago

honestly this was kinda pointless. no offense, but i hate them all. theyre fine how they are

4points

Mary Maney 3 years ago

I think it looks cool with color, but hey change their looks? They were beautiful ❤️

4points

Sue Knerl 3 years ago

Didn't like most of them. He changed the shape of the face to much and made them look to Barbie like. Not a fan.

3points

NWB 3 years ago

It is a no from me....they were stunning before...just leave it be

3points

Michelle Anderson 3 years ago

OK, every single picture change ruined the unique beauty of these women. The originals were fabulous, the "updated" ones generic.

3points

shadowserpenz 3 years ago

Michelle Anderson +

0points

Sue Prewitt 3 years ago

You can't even tell who some them are in the 'after' pictures. Sorry, Hidreley, but you went too far. Should have modernized their hair and clothes, but not their faces.

3points

Danieletc 3 years ago

I don't use the term, "Why, just WHY?" much, but you earned it, this time.

3points

Hans 3 years ago

This AI seems to have a favour for make-up.

3points

JaxRealEstate 3 years ago

Hans love

0points

Mila S 3 years ago

1point

Maneesh BSN 6 months ago

Placement services actively engage in the recruitment of personnel for various industries and sectors. https://bsnemployment.com/

0points

Maneesh BSN 6 months ago

0points

Maneesh BSN 6 months ago

Satin labels are relatively durable and can withstand washing, making them suitable for clothing and textile applications. https://rudraprints.com/

0points

Bepina 3 years ago

don't like it at all - 'modern' versions all look like they've been airbrushed and just look unnatural, just like the photos of women with zillion filters and adjustments look on Instagram today

0points

Sharon Ingram 3 years ago

It looks like their faces were made narrow and longer, fuller lips....I like the b/w pictures of them better.

0points

chvkarthick 3 years ago

Sharon Ingram follower

0points

Jack Candy 3 years ago

0points

hilly field 3 years ago

I love this! What a fun way to seethese beauties fir todays looks,!!!

0points

hilly field 3 years ago

I love this!

-1point

Mila S 3 years ago

Why the downvotes on @hilly field? It's just an opinion. Here hilly, take my upvote. Why do you deserve downvotes for saying what you think?

0points