Aren't we looking at a 2.5 - 5 metre increase in sea levels? This is horrible enough but it's not going to half submerge a 93m statue of liberty... and if it did, the buildings in the background would be far more submerged as well. Some of these are real, some are not. It's a scary enough situation that keeping it honest would be beneficial. Right wingers are just going to take the fake ones and say "see, it's exageration and hype"... don't arm them with this!

Those moles at Stonehenge would need strong teeth. The uprights have a lot below the ground which is chalk/limestone with only a thin layer of soil.

the one about the amazon rainforest hit me the most

Most of these are a bit of a stretch...moles due to climate change, really?

Uhm.. half of the statue of liberty is under water? when in the future is this exactly? Year 20.000.020?

Most of these, especially the bit about the Statue of liberty, are simply not true. A few, like the overpopulation in Mumbai, are quite possible given enough time, but most of it is simply alarmist BS based on misinformation. Greta Thunberg would be proud!

And anybody who saw Ready Player One saw what happened to Columbus in 2045.

well at least there won't be lineups to get in. most people will be gone , zombies rule and the lucky ones will be with Matt Damon on mars. or uranus.

So climate change makes people cut down the rainforest? This article is f*****g brutal in so many ways. Also, if you think the statue of liberty is going to even come close to being underwater you clearly have no idea how much ice is on the land at the poles.

How idiotic. Moles? Seriously?

Does anyone else see the cat face in the Amazon rainforest 'after' mock up picture?

Wow.

Do we really need to forcast anything ELSE right NOW...

I can see what the photoshopper was thinking, but... Hm. Several so obviously nonsense ideas (like Stonehenge suddenly falling over from after 6000years from... moles??). Or the 'Statue of Liberty' image: I think The Expanse has it much more right ---- being on prime real estate of a rich country, it will be shored up with sea walls; Venice being abandoned to the sea might happen as the whole lagoon defence is fragile and over budget.

After climate change? Isn't the climate always changing? What is the perfect temp for the earth? How should that temp be distributed across the globe to each area? If the planet warms and becomes more tropical is that not a far more productive environment for species to develop in? If evolution exist would the planet and all things living on it not evolve to adapt or is there a specific timeframe for evolution to work? What is the optimal amount of time required for evolution to be able to keep up with fluctuations? Why can't the planet take extreme weather fluctuations when places in let's say, `texas, has had temp swings of over 60 degrees in less than 12 hours and nothing happened.

Uh, you people are aware that CLIMATE CHANGE happens constantly and the ONLY climate change engine is the sun? And the last time there was a "massive" climate change happened during the dinosaurs and it was because a meteorite hit the earth. However, the good news is, for all of you jonesing about the end of the world, you have the Yellowstone volcano coming at you. They figure that THAT WILL destroy all life on earth and there is NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT.

WE NEED TO ACT NOW

These made me cry and freak out at the same time

So this is a non-scientist making fantasy photos absent any real data? Interesting.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

this is absolutely magical !

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

ALL BULL S**T!