Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Meghan Markle Was A “Complete Narcissist And Sociopath,” Former Royal Staff Reveal
Meghan Markle Was A “Complete Narcissist And Sociopath,” Former Royal Staff Reveal
125

Meghan Markle Was A “Complete Narcissist And Sociopath,” Former Royal Staff Reveal

2

ADVERTISEMENT

Meghan Markle’s former royal staff labeled her a “complete narcissist,according to the London Times royal correspondent Valentine Low.

In Low’s book, Courtiers: The Hidden Power Behind the Crown, staff membersaccused Meghan and Harryof bullying them and creating a climate of fear. They reportedly said on many occasions, “We were played.”

Highlights
  • Former royal staff labeled Meghan Markle a "narcissistic sociopath," according to royal correspondent Valentine Low.
  • Staff accused Meghan and Harry of bullying them and creating a climate of fear.
  • Meghan denied bullying claims, calling them a "calculated smear campaign based on misleading information."

 Their experience working with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex was so negative that they would later refer to themselves as the “Sussex Survivors Club,” the royal correspondent writes.

BP Daily - Your Source for Unbiased Reporting

    Image credits: Chris Jackson/Getty

    Its core members were private secretary Samantha Cohen, communications chief Sara Latham, and assistant press secretary Marnie Gaffney.

    Samantha Cohen, who was a Buckingham Palace staffer for nearly 20 years, recently revealed that the palace was unable to find a replacement aide for the Sussexes due to high staff turnover.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “We couldn’t find a replacement for me, and when we did, we took them on tour to Africa with Harry and Meghan to show them the ropes, but they left (quit) as well while in Africa,”she said.

    Meghan has always denied the bullying claims, referring to them as a “calculated smear campaign based on misleading and harmful information.”

    A group of former royal staffers said they formed the “Sussex Survivors Club” following their negative experiences with Meghan and Harry

    Image credits: Robin L Marshall/FilmMagic

    Former staff told Low that Meghan created a narrative where she portrayed herself as being rejected by palace aides. This narrative was crafted to support the victim role she would play when she and Harry stepped down as working royals in 2020, they suggested.

    “Everyone knew that the institution would be judged by her happiness,” they said. 

    “The mistake they made was thinking that she wanted to be happy. She wanted to be rejected because she was obsessed with that narrative from day one.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The “institution” refers to the institution of monarchy, which includes palace aides, private secretaries, a communications team that handles the press, and royal household workers, who oversee the day-to-day running of the monarchy.

    They claimed that Meghan “wanted to be rejected” because she was “obsessed” with the victim narrative

    The staff members “came to be so disillusioned that they began to suspect that even her most heartfelt pleas for help were part of a deliberate strategy that had one end in sight: her departure from the royal family,” Low writes.

    In his book Battle of the Brothers, historian and biographer Robert Lacey quotes a Kensington Palace courtier as saying, “Meghan portrayed herself as the victim, but she was the bully. People felt run over by her. They thought she was a complete narcissist and sociopath — basically unhinged,” as perThe Mirror.

    During her famous sit-down interview with Oprah in March 2021, Meghan revealed that she had suicidal thoughts after becoming the target of constant attacks following the birth of the couple’s son, Archie.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “I just didn’t see a solution; I would sit up at night,” and at one point, “I just didn’t want to be alive anymore,” she explained, adding that this was a “very clear and frightening and constant thought.”

    She also claimed that the palace denied her professional help when she was struggling with mental health issues.

    Meghan went to one of “the most senior members” of “the institution” for help but was told she didn’t have that option, as it would create bad press for the palace.

    Share on Facebook
    Marina Urman

    Marina Urman

    Writer, Entertainment News Writer

    Read more »

    With a degree in social science and a love for culture, I approach entertainment journalism at Bored Panda with a research-driven mindset. I write about celebrity news, Hollywood highlights, and viral stories that spark curiosity worldwide. My work has reached millions of readers and is recognized for balancing accuracy with an engaging voice. I believe that pop culture isn’t just entertainment, it reflects the social conversations shaping our time.

    Read less »
    Marina Urman

    Marina Urman

    Writer, Entertainment News Writer

    With a degree in social science and a love for culture, I approach entertainment journalism at Bored Panda with a research-driven mindset. I write about celebrity news, Hollywood highlights, and viral stories that spark curiosity worldwide. My work has reached millions of readers and is recognized for balancing accuracy with an engaging voice. I believe that pop culture isn’t just entertainment, it reflects the social conversations shaping our time.

    What do you think ?
    AR
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That whole “she couldn’t get help” b******t is such a lie. Princess Diana and Princess Margaret both are known to have seen therapists. There was nothing that would’ve stopped Meghan from seeing someone if she was having a hard time. She is such a complete liar.

    greenideas
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Harry had a therapist on speedial (by his own admission) and she had a team of top doctors. I think the whole thing was a narc manipulation tactic to seperate Harry from his family and get him to move to Hollywood. In the pics from that night, he looks glum af while she has a duper's delight smirk. Classic narcissist.

    Load More Replies...
    Vonny
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I've never met her, I don't know her. If you believe everything negative that's written about someone, or a loved one even, wouldn't you wonder how someone who doesn't know you ( or your loved one ) write things about you according only to their own opinions? I'm tired of reading negative about this gal, or anyone else I don't know & just wanted to get that off my chest. Positive comments based on facts would be more interesting.

    Libstak
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I have seen so much damned if you do and damned if you don't about her and Harry, it's just over the top. You are right we have no idea because we don't know them.

    Load More Replies...
    Apatheist Account2
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    More a case of "staff confirm what everybody already knew". She was an actress who fancied a royal title without having to work for it; of course she's narcissistic.

    Rhett Magnum
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Unlike all the other Royals who do work for their titles???

    Load More Replies...
    Serena Myers
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    What some in the UK dislike (too strong a word) find mildly irritating about this couple is their constant whining about privacy (while appearing on Oprah and "writing" a book and publicising all their tours) and Harry demanding that the UK pay for their security should they deign to honour us with a visit when he has more money hidden under his mattress than most people will ever see in their life. Annoying attention seekers, no more, no less.

    JelliTate
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Privacy doesn’t mean never being seen in public or talking about yourself in the projects you create. Privacy in this case means not having a family who sells you out to the trash press every time they need a cover story for their own questionable behavior. Harry and Meghan have escaped and are living their best lives and the toxicity seeping through all of these negative comments gives me all I need to understand why.

    Load More Replies...
    C.O. Shea
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Búllshít. This is MAGAt propaganda.

    Carole G.
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Can't stand this woman, we all know what she is. She can't even fake class.

    Jdlynn
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I think I agree with this narrative. I just wish Harry would see her for who she is and take his children and run

    JelliTate
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Please stop reading Daily Mail or watching Fox News. It’s scary how the media can brainwash an e tire section of people.

    Load More Replies...
    Jonathan C
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    No smoke without fire. High staff turnover is always a red warning flag. People will not want to work in a toxic environment so they get out as soon as they can.

    H. B. Nielsen
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I truly opened this hoping there would be even a single detailed example of something she did. There's an overall theme sure, but not one concrete thing. Seems like it would be easy to tell a story of what actually took place. So basically this whole thing was just the same vague stuff they've already said with some extra words thrown in to make it seem new and further revealing. If the stories haven't been told by now, it's not happening.

    Shelli Aderman
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    OF COURSE the folks still employed by the royals will say whatever their employer tells them to! 🙄

    Load More Comments
    AR
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That whole “she couldn’t get help” b******t is such a lie. Princess Diana and Princess Margaret both are known to have seen therapists. There was nothing that would’ve stopped Meghan from seeing someone if she was having a hard time. She is such a complete liar.

    greenideas
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Harry had a therapist on speedial (by his own admission) and she had a team of top doctors. I think the whole thing was a narc manipulation tactic to seperate Harry from his family and get him to move to Hollywood. In the pics from that night, he looks glum af while she has a duper's delight smirk. Classic narcissist.

    Load More Replies...
    Vonny
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I've never met her, I don't know her. If you believe everything negative that's written about someone, or a loved one even, wouldn't you wonder how someone who doesn't know you ( or your loved one ) write things about you according only to their own opinions? I'm tired of reading negative about this gal, or anyone else I don't know & just wanted to get that off my chest. Positive comments based on facts would be more interesting.

    Libstak
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I have seen so much damned if you do and damned if you don't about her and Harry, it's just over the top. You are right we have no idea because we don't know them.

    Load More Replies...
    Apatheist Account2
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    More a case of "staff confirm what everybody already knew". She was an actress who fancied a royal title without having to work for it; of course she's narcissistic.

    Rhett Magnum
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Unlike all the other Royals who do work for their titles???

    Load More Replies...
    Serena Myers
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    What some in the UK dislike (too strong a word) find mildly irritating about this couple is their constant whining about privacy (while appearing on Oprah and "writing" a book and publicising all their tours) and Harry demanding that the UK pay for their security should they deign to honour us with a visit when he has more money hidden under his mattress than most people will ever see in their life. Annoying attention seekers, no more, no less.

    JelliTate
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Privacy doesn’t mean never being seen in public or talking about yourself in the projects you create. Privacy in this case means not having a family who sells you out to the trash press every time they need a cover story for their own questionable behavior. Harry and Meghan have escaped and are living their best lives and the toxicity seeping through all of these negative comments gives me all I need to understand why.

    Load More Replies...
    C.O. Shea
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Búllshít. This is MAGAt propaganda.

    Carole G.
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Can't stand this woman, we all know what she is. She can't even fake class.

    Jdlynn
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I think I agree with this narrative. I just wish Harry would see her for who she is and take his children and run

    JelliTate
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Please stop reading Daily Mail or watching Fox News. It’s scary how the media can brainwash an e tire section of people.

    Load More Replies...
    Jonathan C
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    No smoke without fire. High staff turnover is always a red warning flag. People will not want to work in a toxic environment so they get out as soon as they can.

    H. B. Nielsen
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I truly opened this hoping there would be even a single detailed example of something she did. There's an overall theme sure, but not one concrete thing. Seems like it would be easy to tell a story of what actually took place. So basically this whole thing was just the same vague stuff they've already said with some extra words thrown in to make it seem new and further revealing. If the stories haven't been told by now, it's not happening.

    Shelli Aderman
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    OF COURSE the folks still employed by the royals will say whatever their employer tells them to! 🙄

    Load More Comments
    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT