wow. so many weird misogynistic stereotypes here. Does this person also believe our wombs detach, fly about our bodies and make us crazy once a month?

This is horrifying. Has this man ever seen a vagina? I could not imagine jamming credit cards up it.

The picture on the right is quite accurate and can apply to this whole post 😳

Oo. This writer does not like the look of pregnant women, so has decided that women must hate it - you know, because he hates it and they surely all want to appeal to him because he's so awesome.

Oh someone needs to tell this person men also get stretch marks and they are not ll from having kids. weightloss or gain does it too

Just imagine the reverse: "every hair in my beard becoming a tiny penis"

Jesus...

Lately my breasts only cry and sigh deeply. I miss all the smiling

Oh dear, this guy just revealed himself to be a very very confused virgin.

Boobs are testicles. They don't "withdraw" because there is muscle and a rib cage underneath and they are just mounds of fat and milk producing tissue. I feel like so many people here did not pay attention in health class. How can they be so clueless about the female body?

*That kinda chick, you know the type... O_o

Woman: "I'm SO HOT omg." Dude: "Just like my dead wife." What?!

I guess the only breasts the author saw were trying to escape from him

This guy is a creepy perv!

H-how would you even...?

Men like Conde should not be surprised that sexy women love other women, and he really should try to help that male chauvinism.

My breasts are embarrassed by this.

Poor old lady. :-D

She had a non-existent vagina?

*brandishes ice cream scoop* Your eyeballs, please.

But no head, brain or mouth. How convenient!

In the first place this whole soaking thing sounds like a dishcloth, this guy obviously doesn't know how pads work. In the second place, pads stick to underwear, in my experience you don't just "fish them out", this guy obviously doesn't know how pads work. In the third place, of course the only possible rational reason why a woman would refuse sex is because she's on her period!, this guy is obviously an effing asshole.

Um, why not just say "I've got my period, bugger off"...? Even if it was possible to just 'fish it out', if it's 'blood soaked', she'd get blood everywhere, and she now has nothing to soak up any further blood. And it's a bit overly dramatic, isn't it?

If he says she “fished”, perhaps he’s thinking of a tampon? Btw, what woman wouldn’t say “I have my period”, instead of showing a dude her lady juice?

That's what happens when you confuse sticky note pads for sanitary pads.

Words people, use your words.

If a guy was doing this and I was politely trying to tell him no - I'd do the same f*****g thing before I got up and left.

Oh can you take it for a sec im taking out the dog

Oh, God. No girl would ever do this!! And, he was thinking with his d**k only.

Ugh come on person who wrote this!!! There is only like, I wouldn't even say 3 drops of blood when you have your period!

If you show me a woman who does this after reading this book i will do everyone a favour and kick the author..... It will be a favour for myself but whatever

....... i need context

You can still have sex on your period.

completely overlooking the fact she didnt want his erect penis that she had no part in arousing...

Ew.

Kids this is why you should always be on your period

Please throw it at his face

This literature (?) is too literal.

panties

Just. Gross.

I mean, sounds like a good tactic to scare off a persistent mans.

holding it out to him??? I would have thrown it in his face!

why is the creep trying to fruck an organelle

Oh....my.....god

NB: this book was originally written in Swedish (by a man), and was actually translated into English by a woman (Tiina Nunnally). So, well ... even if "no woman would ever do this" was actually true (which it is not, in my opinion - first of all, if we should judge everything in books by the question "could this really happen in real life?" NO books would ever be liked/sold/written. Second of all: the problem here is that the man clearly is trying to ignore the woman's signals so she sort of has to resort to something ... unequivocally clear. Not a very unlikely situation at all, at least not in a Swedish crime fiction setting.), I'd say the translator would have "corrected" it if she thought it needed it. My only slight problem here is with "fished out" which I agree sounds "too easy" - I would perhaps have gone for "pulled out" or smth like that.