Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

Share this article:

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

People Are Pointing Out How Animators Exaggerate Female Animal Characters And Give 14 Examples
User submission
3K
309K

People Are Pointing Out How Animators Exaggerate Female Animal Characters And Give 14 Examples

ADVERTISEMENT

When it comes to cartoons, what defines the difference between a boy and a girl if the character is an animal? Moreover, is there a need to clearly define the character’s gender anyway? Apparently, the studio executives behind the most popular cartoons think that it’s crucial, but the portrayal of female animal characters in cartoons is giving some people a serious headache.

Just a few years ago, there were even articles on popular news and entertainment outlets suggesting lists of drawn female characters that “sparked” someone’s “sexual awakening”. “I feel like I’m not the only one who would have this as their cartoon crush,” one person wrote while talking about Jessica Rabbit.

Apparently, when it comes to the question, people are divided into two groups: one group has had enough of “sexy” cartoon characters, while the other group finds nothing wrong with it. “The way I handle this is I remember it’s all fictional and I shouldn’t take it as a nature documentary,” one person wrote on Twitter. Nothing wrong with that, but when other Twitter users started posting examples of sexualized cartoon animals, it was apparent that there was a pattern.

More info: Twitter

RELATED:

    Recently, one Twitter user pointed out a weird pattern they noticed while watching animated movies

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: slimyhipster

    The user argued that anthropomorphized characters that are female are given exaggerated features

    Image credits: slimyhipster

    “Been watching more animated movies lately and I go [wild] every time the animal designs are like this,” Twitter user slimyhipster wrote upon sharing a drawn picture of a male and female design of a character. “Like okay, there’s always been criticism of fantasy species and the females always look like recolored human women versus the males that look like actual cool monster designs,” the person continues. “But this… when they’re based on *real animal species* and the differences between male and female are not like this. Argue for “stylistic choice” all you want but when the consistent design trait that is used across the board for animated female creatures is boobs and eyelashes then we have a problem.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Soon enough, other users on the platform were quick to share the examples they witnessed themselves

    Image credits: tmkeesey

    Most of the cases involved a heavily sexualized female character

    Image credits: polarisu

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Someone mentioned “the sexy lady goose” from the 2004 movie “Balto III: Wings of Change”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: ufopossum

    And characters from the 2020 anime “Seton Academy: Join the Pack!”

    Image credits: angeloratac2002

    But one of the most disturbing cases was the duck from Marvel’s 1986 movie “Howard the Duck”

    Image credits: dimentiorules

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Click here for the uncensored version (at your own risk of sanity).

    Someone posted two deer from Open Season (2006) as a side-by-side comparison

    Image credits: worm_rights

    ADVERTISEMENT

    One user mentioned the female characters in “Ice Age” (2002-2016) as well

    Image credits: strawbrybunny

    Also, Angelina Jolie’s character in “Shark Tale” (2004)

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: marrongum

    And many others

    Image credits: TicoFactory

    Image credits: IsItWine30Yet

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Beyond_Cake

    Image credits: Sorathewonder

    Image credits: jackaboi_art

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: GluffOfficial

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Surprisingly, there was already some research done on the topic. Katia Perea, a Ph.D. of sociology, writes in her paper: “Disney’s pedagogy and gender coding set the stage for the princess master narrative that has come to be associated with animated women; young, thin, demure, attractive, orphaned heroines and their cute animal friends who passively await rescue from an unknown prince.”

    “This image fitted into Disney’s feminine triptych, perpetuating heteronormative gender coding in the form of the princess, the witch, and the fairy godmother. To compete with the overwhelming appeal of the symphonic Disney style of sentimental and cute, rival Warner Bros. animators transformed their cartoons into a cacophony of the surreal. Whereas Disney portrayed its young women as conservative and beautiful damsels, Warner Bros. portrayed them as sexualized broads and dames,” she continued.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “These feminine characters’ gendered demarcations were shown through sexualized attributes such as breasts and curves, as well as feminine clothing, hairstyles, and long eyelashes. Although Warner Bros. women differ from Disney in their sassy attitude and overt sexual appearance, the message remains the same: women exist as the male object of desire. Disney’s damsels, like Snow White and Cinderella, reinforced domestic gender roles whereas Warner Bros.’ sarcastic and sexy dames, like Petunia Pig or Bugs Bunny in lingerie drag, reinforced women’s objectification and, at times, like the girl cat being chased by the boy skunk Pepe Le Pew, violence against women,” Katia argues in her paper published back in 2018.

    However, there were some who didn’t have a problem with the animated design of females

    Image credits: RoonKolos

    ADVERTISEMENT

    There were people who argued that it’s better when the female is “prettier and more colorful”

    Image credits: LgTeknii

    Image credits: Pickledsuicune

    ADVERTISEMENT

    To illustrate the point that it’s not essential to give exaggerated features to female characters, Twitter users shared good examples seen in cartoons

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: edenmist_

    Someone mentioned an animated movie from the 1970s, “The Aristocats”

    Image credits: JinMegamiTensei

    And the fish parents from Finding Dory (2016)

    Image credits: LgTeknii

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: accioharo

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Kitty Softpaws’ character in “Puss in Boots” (2011)

    Image credits: Miraread_tweets

    And two people shared Kung Fu Panda (2008) as a great example of anthropomorphized designs

    Image credits: namseokuwu

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: sir_scandalous

    Naturally, huge discussions like these sooner or later always retreat to jokes

    Image credits: igmrevaporation

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Wolfie_2323

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Which were quite spot on, actually

    Image credits: tristanoscars

    Image credits: MiloZimbenMusic

    And were mocking big studio execs

    Image credits: Neon_woof

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Andrea60723281

    Image credits: murderparrot997

    Image credits: LouarnRanger

    ADVERTISEMENT

    309Kviews

    Share on Facebook
    Neringa Utaraitė

    Neringa Utaraitė

    Author, Community member

    Read more »

    Neringa is a proud writer at Bored Panda who used to study English and French linguistics. Although she has many different interests, she's particularly drawn to covering stories about pop culture as well as history. While not at the office, this Panda enjoys creepy movies, poetry, photography and learning how to play the piano.

    Read less »
    Neringa Utaraitė

    Neringa Utaraitė

    Author, Community member

    Neringa is a proud writer at Bored Panda who used to study English and French linguistics. Although she has many different interests, she's particularly drawn to covering stories about pop culture as well as history. While not at the office, this Panda enjoys creepy movies, poetry, photography and learning how to play the piano.

    What do you think ?
    Add photo comments
    POST
    Tracy
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Jessica Rabbit isn't a rabbit. She's human (an exaggerated cartoon human, but still a human). Her last name is Rabbit because she's married to Roger Rabbit. Now THAT'S the part that's weird.

    Stille20
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Sigh, people need to stop with their outrage. Are some of these ridiculous? Sure, but if they all look the same it is hard to follow the story. And we are already anthropomorphizing them by giving them human specific emotions and story lines... video games are a whole different thing. Give a lady some armor!!!

    Virgil Blue
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That I can agree with. Female armour in rpgs is a running joke. I hold out hope for an rpg maker including bikini armour for the male characters too. The Chain Mail Beach Thong of protection + 1 would be epic.

    Load More Replies...
    Virgil Blue
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Really? People are having trouble with female character shorthand like a more puffed up chest an bigger hips? Its basic cartooning to make characters identifiable, like the barrel chest, big hands and chin a strong character gets (Montaray Jack f.e) or the thin slender built a sneaky character gets. Ok some instances are exaggerated, but most of the time there is a reason for it in the story.

    Luiza NP
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The importance of this discussion is that evidences that being male is the “default/ neutral/normal” in our Society. That being female is considered a specific characteristic, as if women weren’t 50% of the population. ----------------------------- This has important implications in law making, politics and economics. Being man the “neutral” form means that the thought process is usually focused in men’s needs and men’s reality, and that the reality and the needs of women are considered “different”, exceptions from normality. And, because of that, a lot of the times are not considered at all.

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    Tracy
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Jessica Rabbit isn't a rabbit. She's human (an exaggerated cartoon human, but still a human). Her last name is Rabbit because she's married to Roger Rabbit. Now THAT'S the part that's weird.

    Stille20
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Sigh, people need to stop with their outrage. Are some of these ridiculous? Sure, but if they all look the same it is hard to follow the story. And we are already anthropomorphizing them by giving them human specific emotions and story lines... video games are a whole different thing. Give a lady some armor!!!

    Virgil Blue
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That I can agree with. Female armour in rpgs is a running joke. I hold out hope for an rpg maker including bikini armour for the male characters too. The Chain Mail Beach Thong of protection + 1 would be epic.

    Load More Replies...
    Virgil Blue
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Really? People are having trouble with female character shorthand like a more puffed up chest an bigger hips? Its basic cartooning to make characters identifiable, like the barrel chest, big hands and chin a strong character gets (Montaray Jack f.e) or the thin slender built a sneaky character gets. Ok some instances are exaggerated, but most of the time there is a reason for it in the story.

    Luiza NP
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The importance of this discussion is that evidences that being male is the “default/ neutral/normal” in our Society. That being female is considered a specific characteristic, as if women weren’t 50% of the population. ----------------------------- This has important implications in law making, politics and economics. Being man the “neutral” form means that the thought process is usually focused in men’s needs and men’s reality, and that the reality and the needs of women are considered “different”, exceptions from normality. And, because of that, a lot of the times are not considered at all.

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda