ADVERTISEMENT

Mysteries are all around us. With such a big world, we have so much to discover. That’s why conspiracy theories are so fun! Some theories operate on a larger scale, like the moon landing conspiracy; others are often smaller stories.

Someone decided to focus on these low-stakes conspiracy theories and asked people for examples in a now-viral thread on X (formerly Twitter). Get your tinfoil hat ready as you check out these theories. You’ll probably agree with more anecdotes than you think.

More info: X

Image credits: MNateShyamalan

#1

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

DavidYakubik Report

#2

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

sulkingtime Report

#3

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

schauffd22 Report

In this Bored Panda list, you’ll find the tiniest conspiracies that people have come across in their daily lives. Whether it involves the buttons at a sidewalk crossing or British people faking their accents, there are so many crazy theories that actually might not seem so crazy once you think about it.

A conspiracy theory involves an explanation about a person, thing, or event that is usually centered around a secret plot. Conspiracy theorists genuinely believe that their theory is a secret that’s being hidden from the public, often by some powerful officials. It’s no wonder why people are eager to learn more about these plots and uncover the secrets within.

#4

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

LouXanti Report

ADVERTISEMENT
#5

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

Alexander_H_F Report

#6

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

Georgesketch Report

What’s interesting to note about conspiracy theories is that people latch onto them much faster during times of anxiety or uncertainty. Such as wars, natural disasters, and, as of recently, a global pandemic. A study on the rise of conspiracy theories during the pandemic found that three of the most commonly talked about rumors were based on QAnon, the anti-vaccine movement, and anti-5G discussions. 

People also tend to distrust authority figures. So, when they are faced with high levels of uncertainty, conspiracy theories tend to spread even more. This suggests that people come up with these vague rumors and plots to make sense of the rapidly changing world around them and to make some threats seem more understandable.

#7

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

heavyxeyed Report

#8

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

TigerDaz_ Report

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
#9

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

katefeetie Report

Researchers have also found that conspiracy theories play on people’s feelings and sense of identity. That’s why these theorists hold on so firmly to their beliefs. Though there might not be enough evidence or facts to support the stories, people’s faith makes them resist any efforts to prove them wrong. And if people don’t trust authorities, how exactly will these rumors ever be disproved?

According to the University of Nottingham: “People are attracted to conspiracy theories in an attempt to satisfy three psychological needs. They want more certainty, to feel in control, and maintain a positive image of their self and group.”

#10

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

EA_Gardner Report

#11

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

eduprofjamil Report

#12

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

Grunty420 Report

ADVERTISEMENT

A 1995 study by John McHoskey sought to provide an explanation for why it was difficult to debunk conspiracy theories. He gave believers and disbelievers of the Kennedy conspiracy a balanced description of the arguments for and against it. His theory was that those who favored and opposed the conspiracy would both regard that very same statement as evidence in favor of their position. 

His theory was proved to be correct. This is because when people face uncertain information, they tend to hold more strongly onto their point of view. People also readily accept ideas that fit their viewpoint and tend to strongly question anything that doesn’t fit their point of view.

#14

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

NemoAnon0 Report

#15

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

RockyLotito Report

Since this list has many low-stakes theories, some are likely to have a kernel of truth. It’s interesting to note that not all conspiracies are false. Some have turned out to be true over time. For example, it was believed that tobacco companies were hiding evidence that smoking is deadly. Even though there was proof in the early 1950s to show that smoking could cause cancer, it wasn’t until the late 1990s that Philip Morris, the nation’s largest cigarette maker at the time, admitted to it.

ADVERTISEMENT

This is what Joseph E. Uscinski had to say in his work on the study of conspiracy theories: “It is difficult to prove that a secret plot is not taking place behind the scenes. A dearth of positive proof and an abundance of falsifying evidence seem to count in their favor. This is not inappropriate: if powerful actors are trying to hide something it only stands to reason that confirming evidence will be hidden and red herrings will abound.”

#16

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

Alficor1 Report

#17

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

Patlantis48 Report

#18

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

ReviewsPossum Report

With the power of social media when it comes to sharing viewpoints, it might seem like more people are falling for conspiracies. In every corner you turn online, there’ll be someone spilling the tea on a juicy theory that you’ve probably never heard about.

ADVERTISEMENT

That’s why there have been many studies aiming to see if the number of conspiracy theories was truly increasing every year. One study found that there hasn’t been any significant increase. In fact, researchers have found that people fall for conspiracies online only if they are already likely to believe in them or if they are interested in that particular topic.

#20

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

intofourths Report

Conspiracy theories are wild and have become popular for a reason. These low-stakes conspiracies are just juicy enough to get you thinking without pulling you into a rabbit hole of information. Interestingly enough, the post got more than 28 million views and over 800 comments, with some of the wackiest answers possible. If you believe in any minor conspiracy, this is your time to shine. Let us know in the comments and feel free to share more than one.

ADVERTISEMENT
#22

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

Timtherimman Report

See Also on Bored Panda
#23

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

Kaneurysm Report

#25

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

Mary_at_Work Report

#26

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

LordofThe7s Report

#27

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

Starbrrrst Report

#28

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

Hoodie_Milly Report

#29

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

gapernet Report

ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#30

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

asawhatever Report

#31

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

Zeronelite Report

#32

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

50FirstTates Report

#33

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

SureZher Report

#34

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

talkalot_360 Report

Add photo comments
POST
David
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Not exactly, rather thestudies are biased (not false), but they were created by the competition. For example, When Aspartame came out, the companies using that product and their investors funded the studies against saccharin which was the original. Later the inventors of Sucralose did that to Aspartame later, etc

Mike F
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Go back a bit further. In 1970 there was an artificial sweetener called cyclamate that added no awful aftertaste and was quite good. "Studies" showed it was a carcinogen, and it was subsequently banned. When the parameters were made public we saw that it would be necessary to consume 180 bottles of soda per day for 80 days to ingest the amount that was fed to the lab animals in the study. I had a science teacher who was ready to wage a one woman war because she loved the stuff and was really chapped that it was no longer available. Ms Kress, if you're still around, you were awesome!

Load More Replies...
Zedrapazia
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I've never seen corn syrup in anything I can buy in Europe, so I can't really speak for or against it, but given that it's just not available here as it seems, there has to be something bad with it. I also heard it's put into so many things in the US that it makes the people grow more fat

AndyR
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's because the EU doesn't have a corn lobby campaigning to get it into everything.

Load More Replies...
Cosmikid
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Not a "conspiracy theory", but a slightly mangled "fact"...

oddly_informed_raven
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

this is sort of accurate afaik, the US had a corn surplus at one point and decided to deal with it by adding high-fructose corn syrup to everything

Kristie French
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Aspartame poisoning mimics lupus. Don’t drink too much Diet soda folks.

Jeevesssssss
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The studies are... I'm not sure what the right word is. Definitely funded by people with a conflict of interest. And the results are - well, it's not really surprising rats develop bladder cancer if they're fed literally thousands of times more in a day (in equivalent dosages) than a human could/would ever consume, and IIRC not until that dosage was reached... but hey, cancer!

Bob Brooce
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

You mean you'll believe it until you die of cancer caused by artificial sweeteners.

Starwhisper Nighthush
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I can taste the aspartame and find it to be horrible, with a extremely vile aftertaste. It shreds my stomach every time I have it. I don't have to read the ingredients to know it's there.

JK
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

As someone who gets insanely intense migraines that last a minimum of 36 hours anytime I consume even a small amount aspartame (and yes, even when I'm unaware I've had it and only found out from digging through trash later and checking every ingredient label) - I'm afraid I'm going to have to say conspiracy debunked

jdtimid123
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

All I know is, sugar substitutes tend to give me headaches if I use them regularly. Real sugar does not.

Michelle my Belle.
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I don't even care if that's true. Artificial sweeteners are disgusting. And yes DAD I can tell the difference. You've just been eating fake sugar for 40 years and have gotten used to it.

Sue
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is true, and so is the hospitals & doctors pushing Tylenol over Advil. Tylenol is much more dangerous &, at least for me, does nothing for pain. My niece took 20 Tylenol over 3 days & ended up coming close to liver failure. At least now they warn people not to take Tylenol for a hangover. I read that & never gave my daughter Tylenol.

CoralKitty
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

They're just different, and have slightly different indications - both for pain/fever, but Advil is also an anti-inflammatory. Used as directed, Tylenol is easier on your system, while taking Advil regularly over a long period of time isn't great for your gut. Both are very effective, but obviously dangerous/lethal to OD on, so people need to read the instructions, and also be aware of taking other medications containing these products at the same time and unintentionally overdosing.

Load More Replies...
John Jancar
Community Member
8 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

STUPID, the dangers of artificial sweeteners are well known lol Btw, it's even stupider to believe something without wanting to know if it's true or not lol STUPID.

View more commentsArrow down menu
#35

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

VoicesByZane Report

Continue reading with Bored Panda Premium
Unlimited content
Ad-free browsing
Dark mode
#36

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

jfpbookworm Report

#37

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

DarrellDawson Report

ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#38

Lowest-Stakes-Conspiracy-Theory

DeadManSkipping Report