Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Mystery Surrounding Kate Middleton’s Absence Deepens With New Controversial Photoshop Fail
193

Mystery Surrounding Kate Middleton’s Absence Deepens With New Controversial Photoshop Fail

ADVERTISEMENT

The Princess of Wales just acknowledged altering a photo of herself and her children for Mother’s Day, offering a personal apology for any misunderstanding following allegations of digital manipulation.

Something has definitely been amiss with the British royal family, especially since Kate Middleton completely vanished from the public eye in January. The princess’ alleged disappearance was fueled by new controversy surrounding a recent photo released by Kensington Palace. The scrutinized image went on to prompt reputable news agencies to retract it due to suspicions of manipulation, intensifying conspiracy theories.

On Sunday (March 10), the palace, where Prince William and Kate have resided since 2017, released a photo for Mother’s Day in the UK that featured the Princess of Wales seemingly sitting in a chair while smiling at the camera as her three children, Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis stood around her.

The photo was allegedly taken by “The Prince of Wales” at the family’s home in Windsor, according to the palace, as per the family’s official social media pages, including Instagram.

It didn’t take long before people voiced concerns regarding potential editing or AI-generated alterations to the picture.

Controversy surrounds the British royal family as the Princess of Wales admits to altering a Mother’s Day

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: princeandprincessofwales

In fact, the controversial picture prompted news agencies globally, such as the Associated Press (AP), Getty Images, Reuters, and the Agence France-Presse (AFP), to withdraw the image from their archives due to concerns about photo manipulation.

The AP issued a “kill notification” for anyone using the photo, writing in an alert to journalists that after “closer inspection, it appear[ed] that the source [had] manipulated the image. No replacement photo will be sent,” as per an X post (formerly known as Twitter), shared by TV NEWS Royal Editor Chris Ship.

A kill notification is a term used in journalism to indicate the withdrawal or cancellation of a news item or media content, often due to concerns regarding accuracy, ethics, or legal issues.

Moreover, an AP spokesperson released a statement to The Telegraph, saying: “The photo shows an inconsistency in the alignment of Princess Charlotte’s left hand.”

Others have also noted inconsistencies in the alignment of the sweater pattern on Prince Louis’ shoulder, as well as a jagged white line in the background near his knee, People reported.

“No comment from Kensington Palace tonight after at least 3 international picture agencies refuse to distribute this morning’s photo of Kate and her children,” Chris wrote on X.

ADVERTISEMENT

The controversy surrounding the Mother’s Day photo coincides with inquiries into Princess Kate’s withdrawal from public view following her scheduled abdominal surgery due to an undisclosed medical condition in January.

The 42-year-old mother-of-three was subsequently hospitalized at The London Clinic, which resulted in the postponement of several of her public engagements.

Royal commentator Peter Hunt told Metro: “This is damaging for the royals.

“They knew there would be intense interest in any picture they released of Kate.

“Their challenge is that people will now question whether they can be trusted and believed when they next issue a health update.”

The uproar over the Mother’s Day photo aligns with scrutiny over Princess Kate’s absence since January due to undisclosed medical issues

Image credits: princeandprincessofwales

ADVERTISEMENT

For Daniela Relph, a royal correspondent for the BBC, the palace’s bid to hush speculation about Kate’s wellbeing with the doctored photo has backfired.

She said that the “overzealous editing of the picture to get it ready for publication has actually cast doubt on its authenticity.”

Daniela continued: “The implication here is not that the entire photo is a fake or that the Princess of Wales is more unwell than she appears in the image.

“That seems unlikely and would be a very high-risk strategy from the Kensington Palace team.”

Upon calling Kensington Palace’s press office to inquire about the picture, Bored Panda was redirected to an email address.

Image credits: Emily Miller

On Monday (March 11), in a rare personal post on X, signed “C” to denote it was from Catherine (Kate), the princess admitted: “Like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing.

“I wanted to express my apologies for any confusion the family photograph we shared yesterday caused.

“I hope everyone celebrating had a very happy Mother’s Day. C”

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, a palace source told The Mirror: “The Princess has shared a statement on social media.

“This was an amateur family photograph taken by the Prince of Wales.

“Their Royal Highnesses wanted to offer an informal picture of the family together for Mother’s Day.

“The Princess made minor adjustments as she shared in her statement on social media. The Wales family spent Mother’s Day together and had a wonderful day.”

“The plot thickens,” a reader commented

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Share on Facebook
Andréa Oldereide

Andréa Oldereide

Writer, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

I’m a journalist who works as Bored Panda’s News Team's Senior Writer. The news team produces stories focused on pop culture. Whenever I get the opportunity and the time, I investigate and produce my own exclusive stories, where I get to explore a wider range of topics. Some examples include: “Doberman Tobias the viral medical service dog” and “The lawyer who brought rare uterine cancer that affects 9/11 victims to light”. You've got a tip? email me: andrea.o@boredpanda.com

Read less »
Andréa Oldereide

Andréa Oldereide

Writer, BoredPanda staff

I’m a journalist who works as Bored Panda’s News Team's Senior Writer. The news team produces stories focused on pop culture. Whenever I get the opportunity and the time, I investigate and produce my own exclusive stories, where I get to explore a wider range of topics. Some examples include: “Doberman Tobias the viral medical service dog” and “The lawyer who brought rare uterine cancer that affects 9/11 victims to light”. You've got a tip? email me: andrea.o@boredpanda.com

Karina Babenok

Karina Babenok

Author, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

As a visual editor in the News team, I look for the most interesting pictures and comments to make each post interesting and informative through images, so that you aren't reading only blocks of text. I joined Bored Panda not that long ago, but in this short amount of time I have covered a wide range of topics: from true crime to Taylor Swift memes (my search history is very questionable because of that).In my freetime, I enjoy spending time at the gym, gaming, binging Great British Bake Off and adding yet another tattoo artist that I would love to get a tattoo from to my pinterest board.

Read less »

Karina Babenok

Karina Babenok

Author, BoredPanda staff

As a visual editor in the News team, I look for the most interesting pictures and comments to make each post interesting and informative through images, so that you aren't reading only blocks of text. I joined Bored Panda not that long ago, but in this short amount of time I have covered a wide range of topics: from true crime to Taylor Swift memes (my search history is very questionable because of that).In my freetime, I enjoy spending time at the gym, gaming, binging Great British Bake Off and adding yet another tattoo artist that I would love to get a tattoo from to my pinterest board.

What do you think ?
Add photo comments
POST
Linda Csapo
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

As a non-native speaker, I had some fun with admits and amidst in one sentence

Ken Beattie
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Don't some of the phones themselves do a burst of shots and combine them to get the best picture? I think Google (or maybe Samsung) was advertising one with kids blinking, sneezing etc and the end photo is a combo of all the shots where everyone looks like they're smiling. Why assume something sinister when there is such a simple (and likely) explanation?

Flora Porter
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Goodness, what a lot of paranoid, dramatic speculation this seems to have prompted. I can't even see most of the points that have supposedly been identified. After all, they aren't the side of the RF that lives for perfect photos and airbrushing, in all its senses. I honestly doubt there's anything sinister at work.

Ron Baza
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Alternatively: This has shown that they *are* equally culpable of living for perfect photos and airbrushing. But, of course, the press have good reason to hammer Harry and go easy on William, which means that we get fed an endless narrative of “Harry bad! William good! Don’t ask too many questions about about how much taxpayers’ money gets filtered to the sweaty pizza nonce.”

Load More Replies...
Load More Comments
Linda Csapo
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

As a non-native speaker, I had some fun with admits and amidst in one sentence

Ken Beattie
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Don't some of the phones themselves do a burst of shots and combine them to get the best picture? I think Google (or maybe Samsung) was advertising one with kids blinking, sneezing etc and the end photo is a combo of all the shots where everyone looks like they're smiling. Why assume something sinister when there is such a simple (and likely) explanation?

Flora Porter
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Goodness, what a lot of paranoid, dramatic speculation this seems to have prompted. I can't even see most of the points that have supposedly been identified. After all, they aren't the side of the RF that lives for perfect photos and airbrushing, in all its senses. I honestly doubt there's anything sinister at work.

Ron Baza
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Alternatively: This has shown that they *are* equally culpable of living for perfect photos and airbrushing. But, of course, the press have good reason to hammer Harry and go easy on William, which means that we get fed an endless narrative of “Harry bad! William good! Don’t ask too many questions about about how much taxpayers’ money gets filtered to the sweaty pizza nonce.”

Load More Replies...
Load More Comments
You May Like
Related on Bored Panda
Related on Bored Panda
Trending on Bored Panda
Also on Bored Panda