
"Harry Potter Kids Disowning Her Is So Funny": Fans Snap At J.K. Rowling's Controversial Post
Tensions appear to have reignited between Harry Potter stars Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint, and the creator of the franchise, J.K. Rowling, after she made what many believe to be a pointed dig at the trio on social media.
“What actor/actress instantly ruins a movie for you?” a fan asked on X, to which the author replied with a comment that most fans were quick to interpret as a jab at the stars who once played the beloved trio of Harry, Hermione, and Ron.
- J.K. Rowling hinted at 'Harry Potter' stars of ruining movies for her on X.
- The writer and the actor's relationship remains broken due to clashing views on transgender issues.
- Radcliffe, Watson, and Grint remain supportive of transgender rights.
- The franchise is moving forward with new actors for HBO series.
The tension between the writer and the actors stems from their outspoken criticism of Rowling’s views on transgender issues, which have been a source of controversy for years.
“You gave them the throne they now use to look down on you,” a netizen wrote.
Harry Potter creator J.K. Rowling allegedly accused the franchise’s central trio of actors of “ruining movies” for her
Image credits: Andrew Milligan/PA Images/Getty Images
“Three guesses. Sorry, but that was irresistible,” Rowling wrote in response to the X thread, complete with laughing emojis.
“Three guesses? The same people who made millions off your work, then turned on you when it was ‘cool,’” a fan of the writer replied.
In 2020, the three actors publicly distanced themselves from Rowling after the writer made statements that reflected her views as a Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist (TERF), a branch of feminism that opposes gender ideology.
Image credits: Dave M. Benett/Getty Images
The movement, also known as gender-critical, believes that s*x is biological, immutable, and binary and thus opposes the existence of concepts such as gender identity, self-identification, and transgenderism.
Moreover, TERFs are vehemently opposed to measures taken by those who support the trans movement, such as gender-neutral bathrooms and the participation of trans-athletes in women’s sports, as they argue these measures infringe on women’s rights.
Image credits: jk_rowling
Rowling’s detractors believe her views to be transphobic, with Radcliffe being the first of the trio to speak out against her views, stating, “Transgender women are women,” in a message published by The Trevor Project, a non-profit offering mental health support for members of the LGBTQ+ community.
Radcliffe, Watson, and Glint have remained firm in their support of the transgender movement
Image credits: Netflix
Rupert Grint and Emma Watson quickly followed suit, with the Hermione actress tweeting, “Trans people are who they say they are and deserve to live their lives without being constantly questioned.”
Image credits: Prime Video
Despite the three actors having gained global fame through the Harry Potter franchise and the characters Rowling envisioned, their relationship with the author remains broken.
For instance, in a 2024 interview with The Atlantic, the 35-year-old actor revealed that he hadn’t spoken to Rowling in years, a fact that weighed heavily on his heart.
Image credits: Dave Benett/Getty Images
“It makes me really sad, ultimately,” he said, “because I do look at the person that I met, the times that we met, and the books that she wrote, and the world that she created, and all of that is to me so deeply empathic.
“Nothing in my life would have probably happened the way it is without that person,” he added. “But that doesn’t mean that you owe the things you truly believe to someone else for your entire life.”
Rowling revealed that the rift between her and the actors has grown to a point of no return, with the franchise moving forward with a brand new cast
Image credits: jk_rowling
Fans of the author have asked her numerous times if she would be willing to accept an apology from any of the three actors, but she expressed that their rift had grown too large for that to be enough.
“Celebs who cozied up to a movement intent on eroding women’s hard-won rights and who used their platforms to cheer on the transitioning of minors can save their apologies for traumatized detransitioners and vulnerable women reliant on single s*x spaces,” she replied on X.
Image credits: Max
As for Rowling’s billion-dollar enterprise, the franchise is awaiting the debut of a TV series set to debut on HBO somewhere around 2027.
The production seeks to use its longer runtime to provide a deeper look into the wizarding world, adapting content from the book that couldn’t fit in the movies.
Image credits: Max
Little is known of the ambitious retelling of Harry Potter’s story, but HBO representatives have said that it aims to cover the entire saga across seven seasons.
Casting details for the characters of Dumbledore and Severus Snape have also been revealed, with actors John Lithgow and Paapa Essiedubeing confirmed for each role, respectively.
“Spiteful.” Rowling’s detractors took to social media to express their disappointment with her reply
Image credits: girlsbian_
Image credits: matildasmuses
Image credits: too_xedo
Image credits: calykkj
Image credits: WhoMinusContext
Image credits: AdrianA42572365
Image credits: RHughes1990
Image credits: caiox30
Image credits: TerraRizingMoon
Image credits: girlsbian_
Image credits: Techy_fin
Image credits: Eva_nbetterIRL
Image credits: TDCDTweets
Image credits: kasondramoore
Image credits: BlakeKing777
Image credits: MizzMisanthrope
Image credits: LauOAttraction
Image credits: electMikeHarvey
Image credits: MitchPls4Real
Poll Question
This post may include affiliate links.
What do you think about J.K. Rowling's alleged comment about the 'Harry Potter' stars?
It's petty
It's just a joke
It reflects deeper issues
It's blown out of proportion
She could talk like an adult. She could say "I am sorry that they don't see things the same way as I do, but everyone has a right to their opinion. Our friendship ended over this, I'm sorry but that is what sometimes happens". Instead she always writes as if she was still a resentful, nasty teenage girl. It's about winning for her, not about the topic.
She's more of a child than the audience her HP books are aimed at, that's for sure.
I think Dan, Rupert and Emma are principled and thoughtful. JK Rowling is a bigot and deserves to be made irrelevant. The GenX crowd remembers how infallible Bill Cosby was...until we found out otherwise. If someone tell you who they are, believe them. And if they're hateful and discriminatory, it's time to ignore them into oblivion. NOT ONE DAMNED DIME for JK Rowling.
Not reading the article because Rowling, but I will just say that she's an ignorant piece of stinking toilet flotsam.
She could talk like an adult. She could say "I am sorry that they don't see things the same way as I do, but everyone has a right to their opinion. Our friendship ended over this, I'm sorry but that is what sometimes happens". Instead she always writes as if she was still a resentful, nasty teenage girl. It's about winning for her, not about the topic.
She's more of a child than the audience her HP books are aimed at, that's for sure.
I think Dan, Rupert and Emma are principled and thoughtful. JK Rowling is a bigot and deserves to be made irrelevant. The GenX crowd remembers how infallible Bill Cosby was...until we found out otherwise. If someone tell you who they are, believe them. And if they're hateful and discriminatory, it's time to ignore them into oblivion. NOT ONE DAMNED DIME for JK Rowling.
Not reading the article because Rowling, but I will just say that she's an ignorant piece of stinking toilet flotsam.
-6
39