Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

People Divided Whether Mom Is “Overreacting” To Target Kids’ Clothes She Finds Inappropriate
People Divided Whether Mom Is “Overreacting” To Target Kids’ Clothes She Finds Inappropriate
1.1K

People Divided Whether Mom Is “Overreacting” To Target Kids’ Clothes She Finds Inappropriate

31

ADVERTISEMENT

The appropriateness of a little girl’s dress became the center of a heated debate as a result of a mom’s viral video. The controversial clip sparked a conversation on whether some designs are too revealing for young children.

Meghan Mayer, a teacher from Detroit, Michigan, USA, asked her 1.3 million TikTok followers if she was overreacting after finding a collection of summer dresses in the girl’s section of Target that feature cutouts at the hips.

Highlights
  • Mom debates if Target dresses are too revealing for kids, sparking online buzz.
  • Viral video by Meghan Mayer questions appropriateness of kids' dresses with hip cutouts.
  • Comments vary; some find dress cute, others unnecessary, and some fine with style.

The dresses were part of the Girls’ Smocked Bodice Cut Out Chiffon Dress by art class™ and were adorned in several floral patterns with a puffy long sleeve. Some were pink, some blue.

“I am a little bit more conservative when it comes to my kid’s clothes so maybe I’m overreacting but let me know what you think of these dresses,” Meghan, who had taken her oldest daughter shopping at Target, said in a video, which has now gone viral, racking up 1.7 million views since it was posted on Sunday (February 25).

BP Daily - Your Source for Unbiased Reporting

    Meghan Mayer sparked a heated debate after asking her TikTok followers if the girls’ dresses sold at Target were too revealing

    Image credits: thecrazycreativeteacher

    ADVERTISEMENT

    In the video, Meghan explained, as she was filming the racks of “inappropriate” dresses: “So, this is the kid’s section. This is a [size] 6-7, for reference. These are kids’ sizes … Look at these little slits on the sides of these dresses, right at the hips on all of these dresses.”

    The bewildered mother continued: “I saw this, and I was like, ‘Oh, this would be so cute for Easter,’ right? And then, I see this little slit on the side. So, on a [size] 6-7 or 10 or 12-year-old … we’re going to expose this much skin on either side?”

    Image credits: thecrazycreativeteacher

    Meghan went on to admit, once again, that she was a “little bit more conservative”, and that she didn’t even let her daughters wear bikinis, but she wanted to know if she was perhaps overreacting.

    “I don’t know,” she added. “I don’t think this is appropriate at all for this age group.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Meghan’s comment section became a platform for various opinions on the dress, as a TikTok user wrote: “That dress is SO CUTE until you see the slit. Why did they have to ruin it like that?!?”

    “I am a little bit more conservative when it comes to my kid’s clothes so maybe I’m overreacting,” Meghan said

    Image credits: thecrazycreativeteacher

    Another person commented: “Holes not needed. I agree with you!” 

    Meanwhile, other commentators were fine with the fashion style, as someone penned: “When I was a kid in the ’70s, I wore halter tops and tube tops they were not seen as big deals. 

    “I don’t think this is scandalous.”

    A separate individual chimed in: “I don’t think they are too revealing, but I do think the holes are ugly!”

    Image credits: thecrazycreativeteacher

    ADVERTISEMENT

    An additional person sarcastically noted: “Omg a torsoooooo.”

    The sarcastic comment was echoed by someone else: “Overreaction for sure. It’s super cute! Now if it was super short or low cut I would 100% get where you’re coming from.”

    Nudity remains a generally taboo topic associated with porn or as something weaponized to sell products, opinion writer Angela Lezaic wrote for an article published in The Daily Utah Chronicle in 2022.

    The dresses featured cutouts at the hips

    Image credits: target.com

    “With this understanding, Americans are desperate to shield their children from it,” Andrea explained. “But nudity isn’t the issue here. We should be protecting them from the harmful idea that their bodies are inherently sexual.”

    The writer described going to a pool in Serbia at age seven, and being the only little girl wearing a bikini top, as everyone else wore only their bottoms. 

    “I felt embarrassed to go shirtless at first because the U.S. had already indoctrinated me to view my chest as shameful (again, I was seven),” she recalled, as she recognized for the first time the sexualization of her prepubescent body.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    You can watch Meghan’s video below:

    @thecrazycreativeteacherThoughts?♬ original sound – Meghan Mayer

    According to Angela, the Americans’ attitude to nudity is in part a result of Christian values that have fueled the US’ colonial history.

    “Thanks to groups like the Puritans, who viewed human nature as inherently plagued by corruption and sin, we maintain a punitive perspective in life, particularly towards our bodies and our children’s bodies,” Angela wrote. “In the US, this suppression turns into a perversion we project onto literal babies.”

    A cross-cultural study published by the Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences highlighted a more favorable attitude towards nudity in European countries than in the US.

    Meghan’s video continued to fuel different opinions

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Poll Question

    Total votes ·

    Thanks! Check out the results:

    Total votes ·
    Share on Facebook

    Explore more of these tags

    Andréa Oldereide

    Andréa Oldereide

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    Read more »

    I’m a journalist who works as Bored Panda’s News Team's Senior Writer. The news team produces stories focused on pop culture. Whenever I get the opportunity and the time, I investigate and produce my own exclusive stories, where I get to explore a wider range of topics. Some examples include: “Doberman Tobias the viral medical service dog” and “The lawyer who brought rare uterine cancer that affects 9/11 victims to light”. You've got a tip? email me: andrea.o@boredpanda.com

    Read less »
    Andréa Oldereide

    Andréa Oldereide

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    I’m a journalist who works as Bored Panda’s News Team's Senior Writer. The news team produces stories focused on pop culture. Whenever I get the opportunity and the time, I investigate and produce my own exclusive stories, where I get to explore a wider range of topics. Some examples include: “Doberman Tobias the viral medical service dog” and “The lawyer who brought rare uterine cancer that affects 9/11 victims to light”. You've got a tip? email me: andrea.o@boredpanda.com

    What do you think ?
    Jaya
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I didn't know a hole on the side was considered sexual.

    Rob D
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Lol. Only in the "pure, incorruptible" mind of the American christian conservative.

    Load More Replies...
    Flopsy
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Isn’t this lady sexualising young girls herself by assuming these holes are sexual?

    ADVERTISEMENT
    Manny
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    OMG this crazy lady has issues.

    Sarah Kathrin Matsoukis
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Pervs don't care what their victims are wearing.

    Dan Holden
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I suppose if we just had kids wear a burka this wouldn't be an issue /s. Why do people sexualies children this way? It's seriously messed up! Yes, there are sickos out there. You can't change that fact. I was only half joking about the burka, because where does it end? "Better get rid of those cutouts lest a pervert sees it. Well that's better but we're still seeing skin in the arm and leg areas. Ok much better, but some perv might enjoy looking at that face so we should cover it too". It's a slippery slope.

    KillerKiwi
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This isn’t the people making the dress sexualizing children, it’s a the mom

    Load More Replies...
    Lara Verne
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don't understand purpose of these dress cutouts,but I don't see anything sexual about it.

    EP
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Same. They aren’t sexy. They are ugly lol. I have no idea why they’re even made.

    Load More Replies...
    UKGrandad
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    "Meghan Mayer, [...] asked [...] if she was overreacting after finding a collection of summer dresses [...] that feature cutouts at the hips." If the blue dress being modelled in the picture above is one of the dresses in question, Ms. Mayer needs to learn about anatomy, because that slit is NOT over the girl's hips but high on the side of her waist. There is something very wrong in the minds of people who see anything sexual in that, but this woman's puritanical oddness is hardly surprising: after all, Conservative Christians are the American Taliban when it comes to how they treat girls and women.

    Victoria D
    Community Member
    Premium
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You are being silly about this. It's a summer dress. Shows less skin than a lot of outfits. YOU are making it sexual, not any little kid wearing the dress.

    Dan Holden
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don't understand how people can't grasp this. Nudity ≠ sex

    Load More Replies...
    Deborah B
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    How is this any worse than a skirt and a crop top, which kids wear if they want. The cut out is dumb and unnecessary, but it's not "sexualising".

    Pittsburgh rare
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The most religious and conservative are the ones that see sex when they see girls or women's skin.

    Load More Comments
    Jaya
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I didn't know a hole on the side was considered sexual.

    Rob D
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Lol. Only in the "pure, incorruptible" mind of the American christian conservative.

    Load More Replies...
    Flopsy
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Isn’t this lady sexualising young girls herself by assuming these holes are sexual?

    ADVERTISEMENT
    Manny
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    OMG this crazy lady has issues.

    Sarah Kathrin Matsoukis
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Pervs don't care what their victims are wearing.

    Dan Holden
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I suppose if we just had kids wear a burka this wouldn't be an issue /s. Why do people sexualies children this way? It's seriously messed up! Yes, there are sickos out there. You can't change that fact. I was only half joking about the burka, because where does it end? "Better get rid of those cutouts lest a pervert sees it. Well that's better but we're still seeing skin in the arm and leg areas. Ok much better, but some perv might enjoy looking at that face so we should cover it too". It's a slippery slope.

    KillerKiwi
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This isn’t the people making the dress sexualizing children, it’s a the mom

    Load More Replies...
    Lara Verne
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don't understand purpose of these dress cutouts,but I don't see anything sexual about it.

    EP
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Same. They aren’t sexy. They are ugly lol. I have no idea why they’re even made.

    Load More Replies...
    UKGrandad
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    "Meghan Mayer, [...] asked [...] if she was overreacting after finding a collection of summer dresses [...] that feature cutouts at the hips." If the blue dress being modelled in the picture above is one of the dresses in question, Ms. Mayer needs to learn about anatomy, because that slit is NOT over the girl's hips but high on the side of her waist. There is something very wrong in the minds of people who see anything sexual in that, but this woman's puritanical oddness is hardly surprising: after all, Conservative Christians are the American Taliban when it comes to how they treat girls and women.

    Victoria D
    Community Member
    Premium
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You are being silly about this. It's a summer dress. Shows less skin than a lot of outfits. YOU are making it sexual, not any little kid wearing the dress.

    Dan Holden
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don't understand how people can't grasp this. Nudity ≠ sex

    Load More Replies...
    Deborah B
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    How is this any worse than a skirt and a crop top, which kids wear if they want. The cut out is dumb and unnecessary, but it's not "sexualising".

    Pittsburgh rare
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The most religious and conservative are the ones that see sex when they see girls or women's skin.

    Load More Comments
    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT