70Kviews
This Twitter Page Exists To Showcase The Wildest Examples Of Anti-Car People (30 Posts)
Hey, I’m walkin’ here!
Cars have been the bane of pedestrians’ existence for over a century now, but most of us understand how much our lives have benefited from them as well. It would be wise for many of us to cut down on our vehicle dependence, as the average passenger vehicle emits about 4.6 metric tons of carbon dioxide annually. But "everything in moderation," right?
Well, one very vocal community online has gone full throttle with their distaste for cars, so we’ve taken a trip to this Twitter account featuring posts from passionate anti-car people online to share some of their boldest takes. Keep reading to also find an interview with Kea Wilson of Streetsblog USA, and be sure to upvote the pics you can't believe aren't satire!
This post may include affiliate links.
While the posts shared on this Twitter account may seem a bit extreme, it’s understandable why people would advocate for less car-dependent cities, for the sake of the environment and simply to make our lives easier. To learn more about why it’s wise to start thinking about alternatives to car use, we reached out to Kea Wilson, Senior Editor of Streetsblog USA. Founded in 2006, Streetsblog is a daily news site that covers the movement to end car dependence in the United States, and to facilitate a just transition to a transportation system where everyone has meaningful access to mobility alternatives that meet their unique needs.
Kea was kind enough to have a chat with Bored Panda, noting that she definitely wouldn't consider herself "anti-car,” as “like nearly everyone else in the U.S., I drive one, and sometimes I even enjoy it. But I'm definitely anti-car dependency, and the difference is really important.”
“In a city designed around giving people a range of great, broadly accessible transportation choices like walking, biking, transit, a car is just a tool that's good for filling the gaps: getting to that one weird corner of town that doesn't have bus service yet but is still way too far away to walk, transporting a huge load of stuff that you can't carry on a bike or fit on a train, stuff like that,” Kea explained.
As someone who doesn't drive..... only buy what you can carry. You'll learn very quickly how much you actually "don't need"
I’ve seen this posted and reposted and all I can really think is of how great of a solution it is to the idea that being homeless is a crime. Sleeping on streets= illegal. Having a car cover? Not illegal. S****y solution for a systematic issue but im thinking time to start using it more
“In a car-dependent city, though — and in America, that's most of them — the overwhelming majority of trips more or less have to be taken by car, even if you're just going around the corner and carrying nothing at all, because you stand a strong risk of being killed by a driver or left stranded by a late bus if you don't,” Kea continued. “And a whole mess of negative impacts cascade from forcing virtually everyone to being forced to make that choice, not least of which is a dying planet and millions of dead people on our roadways.”
“I'm not anti-car. But I'm also certainly not pro-car — or at least, I don't believe all the tradeoffs we've made to make driving our national, blanket default were worth it in any way,” she added.
Notice not one of these photos are of the city. In a walkable city you walk in town and only have to drive when you leave town.
Kea also notes that there are countless reasons why we should be reducing our dependency on cars, primarily reasons why we can’t afford not to. “Transportation is the leading source of global emissions, and a ton of modeling shows that there is literally no feasible way to achieve our climate targets without reducing how much we drive, even if we electrify the vehicle fleet as rapidly as humanly possible,” she told Bored Panda.
“Cars (and all the maintenance, insurance, fuel, and sometimes, legal fees that come with them) are also one of the biggest sources of consumer debt, and all the parking and road space we build to accommodate their universal use is a massive driver of sky-high American housing costs; it's maybe the single biggest ingredient in persistent poverty, and it will be impossible to end it without getting those costs down.”
“Between car crashes, which killed nearly 43,000 people in the US alone last year, and all the health impacts of automotive pollution, sedentary lifestyle diseases and mental health epidemics linked directly to how little we walk and bike for transportation, car dependency is one of our single greatest public health threats, too,” Kea noted. “it's still the leading cause of death for children under 12, and we can't bring America's falling life expectancy back up unless we follow other countries' lead and start trying to stop these preventable deaths. Needless to say, all of those things impact communities of color and low income far more than white communities.”
Always pay the delivery fee on appliances - just not worth the hassle
When it comes to minimizing car dependency in your own life, Kea says the best step to take is getting involved in the movement to end it for everyone. “Vote for politicians that understand what's wrong with by-default driving; get involved in the fight to make your cities better to navigate outside a vehicle,” she shared. “If nothing else, read sites like Streetsblog to learn as much as you can about this massive, incredibly multi-faceted problem and get ideas for how you can be part of solving it.”
Kea also recommends that anyone who is privileged enough to have some ways they can become less car-dependent in their daily life start exploring those options. “I think it's particularly important to experiment with habits when we have the opportunity to make big life changes," she says. "If your daughter is starting school this year, maybe this is the year you organize a ‘bike bus’ with all the neighborhood kids so they can all ride together (and you can skip waiting in the long drop-off line of SUVs).”
“If you're starting a new job, maybe you research the local bus routes and see if you can get a jump on some of your daily tasks while you're still riding, and maybe even leave a little early at the end of the day; just try it for a month and see if it works for you,” the expert continued. “If you're moving to a new town, do as much as you can to find an apartment in an area with a few restaurants nearby that you know you'll go to a lot instead of always schlepping across town. And even if you truly do need to keep driving for 100% of trips, could you at least drive a smaller car that'd be less lethal to pedestrians if you got in a crash, rather than an SUV that's likely to kill them, so your neighbors who don't or can't have a car at all are a little less scared to walk themselves?”
Kea acknowledged that all of these solutions require significant privilege, but “they're all versions of things that low-income car-free people without the privilege of being able to choose how they get around manage things; we can all learn a lot from them.”
Some get a chain and a truck and just yank the dude out like a tree stump.
Kea also noted that she understands why some people have negative reactions to groups like [Screw] Cars and phrases like #BanCars. “A lot of us love our cars, and view them as powerful symbols of our freedom and identity. And even if we don't, a car, on its own, is an inanimate object, and one that can be hugely useful,” she told Bored Panda.
“If I didn't know what I know about the way that car dependency harms myself and literally everyone I know, I could understand why randos on the internet who are egging suburban car owners' houses or deflating SUV tires to make a point might seem pretty extreme,” she continued. “I also get why calling a kid's toy car set ‘propaganda’ might seem kinda ludicrous, the same way that candy cigarettes, on their own, seem like a harmless snack, if you compartmentalize the fact that cigarettes kill a ton of people.”
Might have something to do with most North Koreans not being able to afford a car.
I question what you'd rebuild. Is this an area that is regularly destroyed? Maybe it's better to buy it back in it's entirely and turn it back into wetlands and make it a national park.
It all depends on context.I've seen quite a few of this type of vehicle when I visited Amsterdam last week and I see why they can be practical over there. If you don't live in a larger city, that's different of course.
“But the thing is, a car isn't just an inanimate object,” Kea says. “It's a machine around which our entire society has been literally rebuilt, at the cost of trillions of dollars and over a million dead people on roadways every single year, and it is not an exaggeration to say our literal planet is dying in large part because we did that. It could be a neutral technology that helps people get a little further than they could on a bike or carry a little more than they could on the bus, and I hope someday it is! But right now, it's not; it's a thing that most of us are forced to use whether we like it or not, something that dominates and shapes virtually everything about our world.”
Kea also noted that Twitter accounts like this aren’t just poking fun at vandals with cartons of eggs or “sensitive snowflakes” who throw fits over a photo of a kid's toy car set. “They're people with disabilities who are struggling desperately because they can't drive in places where driving is the only option,” Kea told Bored Panda. “People whose loved ones have been killed violently and suddenly by car crashes that didn't need to happen; people who are questioning the costs and death count of car dependency and finding that when they speak out about it, they aren't just ignored, but ridiculed and subjected to ableist slurs like ‘insane.’”
Kea points out that pages like this don't discuss “even the most basic facts about transportation-related climate change and car crash totals, which are only the tip of the iceberg. The people the authors of this Twitter are making fun of aren't ‘insane’; they're people who don't accept that things have to be this way.”
If you’d like to learn more from Kea and the rest of the team at Streetsblog USA, be sure to visit their website right here!
Hmm, I'm not entirely against this one. It's not as insane as the other posts. If they genuinely live somewhere where driving isn't necessary then why does she need the license or the car? But I also subscribe to the belief that parents shouldn't buy their kid their first car. It's on the kid to buy their own. Honestly they should be sitting down and having a sensible discussion about what she wants to learn to drive for and where she'd be driving. If she's got decent reasons then help her get her license. If not, then don't.
We know you might find these posts annoying, but please remember that cutting down on car use doesn’t have to be this extreme. The planet will thank you if you reduce your emissions; you don’t have to do it for these people. Keep upvoting the pics you find most amusing, and then if you’re interested in checking out another Bored Panda article discussing why many people want to stop driving cars, look no further than right here!
Superfluous use of the word propaganda by these people indicates a lack of intellect and a diminutive vocabulary.
All this group of posts does is prove how splendid a job the auto lobby has done.
Sadly. I was astonished to read how many commentors are dependent on their cars going so far as to get offended when somebody points out the problems cars cause to their communitiess and the simple solutions there are to make their neighbourhood people friendly if only theyw ere willing. So many people think only of their own comfort and for too many people that means a car to go everywhere, even if they just need a loaf of bread and a gallon of milk. Wouldn't it be nicer if you could walk to the corner shop. The one next to the café, with the nice terrace under the trees, where you wave to the nice couple you talked to two weeks ago when you had a nice cool drink on the terrace while watching the world go by... Sorry, people who need to take their cars everywhere don't live near a cornershop with a nice café next door....
Load More Replies...I am somehow confused about this post. I never spoke to anyone being this negative about cars. And like with a lot of things, hate doesn’t change other peoples opinions. That being said, wouldn’t it be nice that some American cities would be redesigned in a way that you can actually walk to your shops? It would be healthier and let people reduce their carbon footprint.
Hatred towards others most likely will make them even more resilient towards change and holding on to their beliefs?
Load More Replies...Look, are some of these posts dumb? Yes. But some of them are also perfectly reasonable? Why must we just accept that in many places people cannot do their grocery shopping without a car? And not because of the amount of groceries, but because it's too far away and completely inaccessible by foot or by bike? Why can we not accept that bike lanes and walking paths should be an infrastructure priority *as well*?
We can accept it, but that doesn't seem to be their goal. Instead of making bike lanes a priority too a lot of these people seem like they want bike lanes as the only priority.
Load More Replies...All this group of posts does is prove how splendid a job the auto lobby has done.
Sadly. I was astonished to read how many commentors are dependent on their cars going so far as to get offended when somebody points out the problems cars cause to their communitiess and the simple solutions there are to make their neighbourhood people friendly if only theyw ere willing. So many people think only of their own comfort and for too many people that means a car to go everywhere, even if they just need a loaf of bread and a gallon of milk. Wouldn't it be nicer if you could walk to the corner shop. The one next to the café, with the nice terrace under the trees, where you wave to the nice couple you talked to two weeks ago when you had a nice cool drink on the terrace while watching the world go by... Sorry, people who need to take their cars everywhere don't live near a cornershop with a nice café next door....
Load More Replies...I am somehow confused about this post. I never spoke to anyone being this negative about cars. And like with a lot of things, hate doesn’t change other peoples opinions. That being said, wouldn’t it be nice that some American cities would be redesigned in a way that you can actually walk to your shops? It would be healthier and let people reduce their carbon footprint.
Hatred towards others most likely will make them even more resilient towards change and holding on to their beliefs?
Load More Replies...Look, are some of these posts dumb? Yes. But some of them are also perfectly reasonable? Why must we just accept that in many places people cannot do their grocery shopping without a car? And not because of the amount of groceries, but because it's too far away and completely inaccessible by foot or by bike? Why can we not accept that bike lanes and walking paths should be an infrastructure priority *as well*?
We can accept it, but that doesn't seem to be their goal. Instead of making bike lanes a priority too a lot of these people seem like they want bike lanes as the only priority.
Load More Replies...