
50 Facepalm Moments To Make You Question The World More Than You Already Do (New Pics)
Interview With ExpertMore than half of the world now uses social media. That’s around 5 billion people posting whatever they want, whenever they want. While a lot of the content out there is entertaining, informative and interesting, there’s also some that might make you question why certain individuals don’t have their devices confiscated while they sit in the naughty corner. From misinformation, to sheer stupidity, to a lack of critical thinking, there’s no shortage of unsharp tools in the proverbial digital shed.
Thankfully, there’s an online community that makes it their mission to shame those who refuse to think before they type, speak or act. The Facepalm subreddit has more than 8.2 million members, calling out people who have proven themselves to be fools without fear or favor. Bigotry is not tolerated, states the page, though facepalming at it is welcome. We've put together a list of the most cringey, awkward and downright dumb things shared on the page that shine a light on humanity’s beacon of stupidity. Bored Panda also reached out to William DiAntonio, founder and CEO of Reputation911 for some advice on how to conduct oneself online and what to do if or when things fall apart.
This post may include affiliate links.
And it's no joke. I once talked to my grandmother (who had still seen things like diphtheria in her youth) about vaccinations and she had absolutely no effs to give about anti-vaxxers. She said no one in their right mind would refuse protection against those diseases.
In a world where we are bombarded with information left, right, and center, critical thinking is just that: critical. If we were to believe everything we read online, watch on tv, or hear in person, the consequences could be fatal.
Monash University defines critical thinking as “a kind of thinking in which you question, analyse, interpret, evaluate, and make a judgment about what you read, hear, say, or write.” Good critical thinking is about making reliable judgements based on reliable information, notes the university.
When you lack the ability to think critically, and believe everything you read or hear, you run the risk of doing or posting some very stupid or questionable things online. And in turn, ripping your reputation to shreds. What you put out there influences the way people perceive you.
And while you can’t control everything others say, you can manage the content you publish, your responses to feedback, and address defamation to influence the public conversation, warns online reputation management firm Reputation911.
The kids was not CEO. Only 'k*****g' embryos and CEO will get you this punishment.... 🤔🤷♂️
USA is screwed. You guys are the only country in the word that doesn't have universal health care, billioners don't pay taxes and it is legal to buy a politician. You're down down the drain and that is sad.
Bored Panda reached out to the founder and CEO of Reputation911, William DiAntonio, to find out more about the importance of keeping your nose clean in the digital age.
"Online reputation management (ORM) is the process of shaping how individuals or companies are perceived online. It involves monitoring digital presence, addressing negative content, and proactively building a strong, credible brand across search engines and social media platforms," DiAntonio tells us during our interview. "ORM combines SEO, crisis communication, content strategy, and privacy protection to ensure that online narratives reflect a person's or company's true reputation."
We could have had Sanders and Corbyn, but no, they were too extreme and radical.
peoples right to own guns over children's right to not worry about being k****d at school
Reputation911 cautions that social media can be a double-edged sword. Things can go either way, depending on what's posted. As we've seen time and again, content can go viral in a flash on social media, and this isn't always a good thing. Managing your content on social media is critical, warns the agency, and using socials strategically can help with your online image.
"One of the biggest mistakes people make on social media is posting impulsively, without considering how their words or images may be perceived in different contexts. Avoid sharing controversial opinions in a way that invites backlash, disclosing too much personal information, or engaging in heated arguments that can escalate," DiAntonio told Bored Panda.
The expert adds that it's important to remember that even deleted posts can be screenshotted and resurface later. He says it’s always best to pause before posting and ask "Would I be comfortable seeing this on the front page of a news site?"
Thanks for censoring the word múrder. what would be do if that word was clearly readable?
Reputation911's CEO warns that in today’s digital-first world, a person’s or company’s reputation is often determined by what appears in a quick Google search. "Employers, investors, customers, and even personal connections use online information to form first impressions," says DiAntonio.
"A strong reputation builds trust, credibility, and opportunities, while a negative or misrepresented online presence can result in lost business, damaged relationships, and long-term professional setbacks."
I am on the fence about this, transgender M2F are physically still males and that would be an unfair advantage over females, F2M transgenders would be no competition for males , just introduce a 3rd and 4th competition level for transgenders and you are all set.
The point of the post is, it happens so little that all that energy is probably better spent on bigger issues.
Load More Replies...THIS is what you’re worried about? You may lose your social security benefits, lose any useful information or medicine for Cancer, ingest god knows what in your food and water, live under putin’s whims, ruin our relationship with the Entirety of Europe & beyond, but you’re fixated on .00003 percent of the population who are simply trying to exist. FFS. We are doomed. There’s no reasoning with willful ignorance.
Not disagreeing that there are bigger issues. But saying that this only affects 100 trans athletes is exactly why this is a problem. It's not a problem for those 100 people, is a problem for the cis female athletes who unfairly have to compete with people who may identify as female but have the body of a man. If trans M2F athletes compete with women, then there is no point in any women leagues at all.
Trophy Husband. You really don't understand the transition process at all do you? M2F trans women do NOT have "men's bodies". They take female hormones (just like many women take birth control pills) that make their bodies express as female. Their musculature is adjusted. Depending on when they transitioned, they MIGHT have denser bones, but the hormones make them female just like cis women's hormones make THEM female. This is such an invented issue. You people just need to get a bigger problem, because this is NOT it.
Or you could NOT F*****G CARE! The president of the NCAA got up in front of congress and confirmed that there are about 10 trans athletes that are competing at the national level. That's it. You're concerned about 10 kids out of thousands. If you want "fairness" there are height and weight classes. That's how you can balance things out. But people don't want that, they want to find ways to exclude trans people because they don't know trans people and they don't want to learn about them. All you people wringing your hands and claiming you care about fairness are exhausting because no, you don't. You just want to target some kids who have it hard enough already. Seriously! You want it fair? Okay! Height/weight classes and the playing field is fair! But no one actually wants it fair, they want THEIR kids to have the advantage, and they DON'T want to see or hear from trans kids
There are less than 100 trans atheletes in NCAA. It is a tempest in a teacup.
That's a non-argument. Either something is allowed or it isn't. You wouldn't say that it's OK for athletes to take performance-enhancing d***s so long as it's only a few doing it, would you?
@UKGrandad. It's more to do with the sheer amount of time, energy, and pure hatred that is poured into a 'problem' that affects a tiny minority of people when such huge issues exist all around. It would be like saying "Well 100 athletes are using d***s so let's use that as an excuse to dehumanise all d**g addicts and at the same time deflect funding, care and research from the issues".
@UKGranddad. As a cis-girl who "had to" accept a transgender girl into my changing room and bathrooms at school: I didn't give s single flying f**k about it! Neither did my classmates. I was 12, I didn't care what their chromosomes looked like, it was just another classmate, and a nice one. Stop creating conflict where it is not needed
UkGandad, by the trans people to the changing room assigned at birth logic, I would have to go the women's one, beard and all.
EXACTLY! Imagine my trans male friend, who although not very tall is bearded, muscular, looks like a lumberjack, AND is sexually into women, using the ladies' bathroom with your teenage daughter. OR how safe my trans female niece who is very feminine and gorgeous would feel using the men's room.
How’s the single-s*x bathroom situation working out in your home? Let’s be honest: women and girls face far greater risks from men they already know—partners, exes, authority figures like priests, police officers, pastors, doctors, or dentists—than from the imagined threat of transgender individuals. The idea that transgender people pose a significant danger is not only unfounded but distracts from the real issues at hand. If you’re genuinely concerned about safety, the most impactful step you can take is to challenge your own biases and ensure you’re not passing those prejudices on to the next generation. Education and empathy, not fearmongering, are the keys to creating a safer, more inclusive world.
I vote lets get universal health care, equality health care for women, take down the oligarchy and get our infrastructure for food and travel in order THEN we can worry about if the kickball game was fair or not.
Yeah you're not getting how this just exists as a distraction to make you forget about the real issues. It's you, hi, you're the problem, it's you.
My experience with those who transition is that they don't do it for sports participation. They do it to become who they feel themselves to be. Human notions of gender and sexuality have been stuffed into psychiatric 'straight' jackets for centuries, largely due to the influence of churches and their armies.
Dude some guys are small and can't build muscles. Some girls are tall and muscular. Physical inequality is a thing regardless of gender or transition. I mean seriously no one is gonna argue Shaquille O'Neal doesn't have a massive physical advantage but I don't see anyone banning him from basketball.
There are 500,000 athletes in the NCAA, across all sports. Want to take a guess at how many transgender athletes there are in the NCAA, across all sports? Less than 10! This is such a non-issue distraction from the actually devastating things Cheeto Hitler and the unelected surgically modified billionaire brat are doing right now.
"... unelected surgically modified billionaire brat..." You're mocking somebody for being surgically modified...in a thread about transgender? You really did not think that one through! EDIT: Why am I being downvoted for this? I'm not the one mocking surgically modified people.
If trans women have been undergoing hormone therapy for a long time, their muscle mass advantages are just about nil. There are other advantages of course, but you actually don't see trans women consistently winning over cis women. More importantly, this sports debate is always the excuse to deny and fear-monger about trans people. Tbh i don't care all that much about sports medals when compared with human rights and all that...
Instead of just making stuff up that sounds right to you, try looking for the actual facts. Trans women retain a large advantage over women regardless of how long they've been on hormone therapy. A recent U.N. report has stated that nearly 900 medals in women's sports have been won by M2F athletes. This debate is not about fear-mongering; sport is just one part of a much larger issue about women retaining their rights as women. You might not care about medals but women who train hard for years to reach the top of their game certainly do.
Mtf athletes lose all the time, ftm athletes win. If they're taking hrt or post op their bodies are no longer physically stronger. Hell, cis women beat men sometimes. Separate the leagues by skill instead of gender and problem solved. Also trans athletes are so rare that it's not even a big deal.
There's a solution for this. Puberty blockers would limit the amount of testosterone produced in a M2F transition. Simply test athletes for testosterone. The instead of male or female, athletes are judged based on their hormones
Doesn't sound like you're on the fence, it seems you have a concrete opinion on the subject.
When M2F begin their treatment, their muscle mass pretty much stays the same, but as they continue their treatment, their muscle mass decreases making competition more equitable. However, the small percentage of M2F sports participation should be a very minor concern of our government. They should be focusing on housing, food prices, and health coverage that's rampant throughout the nation.
at least when i grew up there (the 80s-90s), in the state of florida, if there is/was not an equivalent girl's sports team at a high school, any girl who tried out and met the qualifications to make the team was legally allowed to play. not to say it all went perfectly and there wasn't a lot of social discrimination. but i made the wrestling team at my school and one of my female friends was the most petite, blonde junior varsity quarterback. we both surpassed guys to qualify for our respective teams. we were not the only girls competing on teams comprised primarily of boys. so yeah, while there are some physiological differences, there are sports/individuals/situations where women and men can absolutely out compete each other in sports.
One of my trans friends is 6'4" and rocking 200bs of muscle. She could kick my boyfriends a*s easily, and I would be zero competition in anything physical. She'll judge your makeup, but not the ability to win in a footrace. I'd win at badminton, though. We both get the cheap beer, and can't stand the current environment .
Wrong on all counts and I do not support your bigotry, no matter how you try to hide it. Mind your business and stay out of other peoples' pants if you weren't invited.
But it depends on if they started taking hormones before puberty or after.
absolutely does! my friend is on testosterone, which literally made him f**kin BUILT. he has MASSIVE muscles and his voice is all changed and (congrats to him!!) he got top surgery!! he has like zero hips anymore and people always assume he's a guy! he's gotten onto the wrestling team at my school after clearing up some of his official records.
Hers the kicker m2f estrogen and testosterone blockers atrophy the athletic abilities.f2m testosterone and estrogen blockers enhance the players abilities by more testosterone.estrogen blocker.
So how many f2m athletes are beating men in competitions? How many m2f athletes are beating women in competitions? There is a very good reason that we hear demands for m2f inclusion in women's sports but not for f2m inclusion in men's sports, and that reason is that the latter know that they cannot compete against men on a level playing field, whereas the former are aware of the massive advantage they retain against women, so please don't pretend that it works both ways.
Except m2f lose muscle strength and atrophy because estrogen and testosterone blockers and vice versa for f2m.
I don't understand why people in this comment section are arguing so much about this issue. This isn't about who is included or not, or who is saying what, or who is insinuating what. The post is literally talking about how there's bigger problems than this. And look, a transgender person recreationally playing sport with someone of their gender is quite honestly none of our business. At the professional level, we have height and weight classes. Genuine studies have proven that trans females don't have significant advantages over cis females, and certainly do not consistently win. I understand that some less ethical cis men might take advantage of this and try to underhandedly cut the competition, but rules and regulations can be put into place to avoid this, and present an inclusive atmosphere for all. There really isn't much to argue about here. Everyone deserves to play sport, and everyone deserves an equal chance to win. Can we please just agree on that?
I think for at least sports, they should set a boundary, like once you get passed this point you can compete in the desired division. But, this is only for physical sports. In sports that are strategy, like esports or chess, there is no excuse for them even being gender divided
Or let each sport's governing body make their own decisions and policies to ensure fairness specific to their circumstances?
I mean lots of policies are being put in place and a lot of the advantages people speak of do go down when on hormone therapy so i feel like its not insane like people try to make it out to be to make trans people look bad for no bloidy reason
2 additional competition levels is not going to get you anywhere. Within the male population the difference in levels of testosterone is already making it an unfair fight. Same for female. Some females naturally have higher levels of testosterone and those are the ones that usually win. So it is already unfair. Winning is not completely due to dedication, training and talent...
Yeah, my sentiments exactly. At that point I feel one needs to defend women's sports.
Do you know any "transgenders" (transgender people)? Have you studied any of the science? Do you know what happens to muscle mass and strength after years of hormones?
I agree... I'm not saying this is the biggest issue we have, but M2F trans who completed as an F in the past were cheating and using discomfort to get their way. The records should be stripped and titles revoked. Teams that allowed it were cheating too. And going forward either they all compete against the men or there are new leagues like you suggested. So many things follow this pattern. Racism is a huge problem, but reverse discrimination isn't the answer. Service animals need to be allowed in stores, but ESAs should stay home. And I'm all about letting people earn more of they work harder, but set limits, no one should be worth a billion dollars!
Gets slightly more even if both teams do it. Also, mixed teams exist anyway
The research does not support what you are saying. Transgender females are NOT physically equivalent to cis males. Do they still have physical advantage over cis females in sports? The research is mixed but it is leaning toward "not significantly."
Yes, I'm in favor of trans rights but not a biological male beating up a biological female in a boxing ring, which happened recently.
If you’re talking about the Olympics, it didn’t. That was a cis-female boxer who had previously lost to the same competitor who now claimed to be too afraid of her to fight her.
Jesus Christ. No. In fact, everything you just posted is wrong. Recent studies have shown that the hormone treatments taken during M2F transitions often leave the user in a disadvantaged state for women's sports. Likewise a simple google search can show you plenty of F3M trans folks who can easily hold their own against other men. H**l, women's sports was pretty much invented because men are afraid of losing to women. The whole "women are weaker than men" thing is a d**n myth.
Women's sport was invented because men were afraid of losing to women? What the H**l are you talking about? Please, find one - just one - event from the last Olympics in which the woman who won gold would have beaten the gold medalist in the equivalent men's event. Just one. Track, field, swimming, weightlifting, cycling, rowing: any discipline that has an equivalent men's and women's competition.
exactly. you can cut things off & put things in but you cannot CHANGE BIOLOGY. SheMales do not belong in female sports. PERIOD.
What I find chafing is there is NO mention in all this falderal about F2M. Trans doesn't mean "used to be a guy". It means "used to be opposite. And, as LB mentions, the percentage of trans Americans is well under 10%, across all age groups. The percentage that actually want to play sports is miniscule.
On the trans thing I honestly do not give a s**t people should be allowed to be who they wanna be gender wise !, try worrying about your f kin Oompa Loompa being the cause of ww3 during his time cos he will be leave genders alone anyone as voted for him is a racist homophobic despicable as he is oh and a misogynistic c with it !
i do not give a c**p who competes in what sport. my disabled son is losing his Medicaid benefits. i did not vote for Velveeta Voldermort and because of short sighted republican a$$butt$, hes goin to be denied care he needs. i do not give one flip who is in what bathroom or who is on what sports team
I'm also on the fence about this. I have always believed that people have the right to live their lives as they choose, as long as what they do doesn't affect the lives of people around them in a negative way. The transgirls/women in sports issue is a tough one. On the one hand, I agree that all people should have the right to compete in sports, but on the other hand, I can certainly understand how some women would feel that a man who became a woman might have some unfair advantages. And while there has been at least one study that says this isn't true, I think more research is needed in this area. Is it possible that transgirls/women have some advantages over cisgendered girls/women? I think it depends on the sport.
I'm not a trans person, and I don't know a lot about this, but I do know that once someone starts taking hormones, their body physically changes. Stuff like muscle mass, smell, and probably other things that I'm forgetting. So if a trans athlete has taken hormones, they do not have a 'biological advantage' over cis competitors. And even if they did, why in the world should something like CHESS be divided by s*x?
Load More Replies...Actually they do still retain a physical advantage. This is all down to how testosterone exposure during puberty. Lowering testosterone levels will decrease their existing muscle mass but they will still be proportionally stronger than women. As for chess, I believe that women are actually allowed to compete in male games however a separate women's class was created due to issues with harassment and to encourage more women to play at a professional level. It wasn't due to gender differences impacting play.
Obviously intellectual games are not in the category as physical sports. Hormones chemically change your body not physically. They don't produce a 6'2" stature, or let someone be more muscularly flexible. The game of golf is called golf for men and women, but they start at different tees and use b***s with a different compression rating. Because men and women so physically different. Baseball/softball. Men's gymnastics does not look like women's gymnastics. I have heard of no one having qualms about a trans kid joining model UN. Knock it off.
I'm kind of on the fence too, but the problem with this argument is that it's not fair to start with. People are born with random mutations all the time that make them better at certain sports. Longer arms make you better at rock climbing. More testosterone makes you better at weightlifting - and men have varying amounts depending on genetics, so we don't even need to bring gender into it and it's already unfair. Michael Phelps is clearly miles better than everyone else at swimming, but they're not talking about banning him to give others a chance. Maybe what we SHOULD be looking at is some sort of "weight class" categories in all sports that put you in a bracket based on your talent and/or physical characteristics and then you compete within that bracket. I don't know if that's the solution, but I do think we should use this discussion to reconsider sports and competition in general and think outside the box while we do. It's doesn't have to be black or white.
Im generally pro trans rights but I think it’s ok to separate sports by biological gender. We separate them by age already, and I’ve never heard anyone argue against that. My example I use is if a 12 foot tall alien came down and wanted to play basketball it would probably ruin the sport. Yes shaq had a size advantage but it’s not like the lakers won every game by 100 points. The goal should be fair competition and unfortunately biological s*x can create a large enough advantage in some situations that I just don’t personally want to see it the same way I don’t want to see shaq post up a 12 year old.
After hormone therapy the biological advantage is no longer an issue.
Load More Replies...And my kids have even less right to choose how to live their lives in the 'land of the free' Here in Baloney Town. Instead of people minding their own.
The comments are a prime example of people worrying over the wrong f*****g thing.
Having priorities is what makes the rest of the world soooo envious of the US.
I know several trans women. One of them was telling me her testosterone levels now are actually LOWER than what a biological female is. She lost muscle mass and struggles to open a jar, due to loss of strength
You don't need to make those choices out here in the civilised world.
This is a man's perspective. Allowing transgender women to compete is not fair. Biologically their physique is male and therefore not fair to the females. To be inclusive, I suggest adding the group transgenders.
Load More Replies...So we let people die of hunger or lack of healthcare, but at least we've "solved the "trans "problem"""?
EQUAL RIGHTS FOR ALL (except when inconvenient), n'est ce pas? S*********n is never the answer.
then we would just be labeled as transgenders. imagine all the hate we'd get if some sports guy announced "oh, the trans womens' swimming team!" it would put a target on us.
'Labeled' as transgender? Transgender people *are* transgender. Actual bigots aside the problem isn't that they're trans, it's that they're demanding inclusion in women's sports (and all aspects of women's single-s*x facilities, etc.). I have seen the idea of separate trans categories floated many times and every time it has been massively objected to on various grounds but which all come down to one thing; they want to be in the women's category. Just as with the bathroom issue, they claim that they just want to able to play their sports and there is nothing stopping them from doing just that. There is already an international Gay Games competition and there's nothing stopping trans people from organising their own leagues and competitions - just as women had to. But they reject this option because they don't 'just want to play sports', they specifically want to play in the women's games.
Its no different than a heavyweight boxer going up against a featherweight.
People shouldn't have to decide between insulin and removing men from women's sport, both are important and women rights shouldn't ever be sacrificed or used as a bargening chip, I hate this whataboutery, Is he saying women and girls should give up their sporting places, dreams and scholarships so people can have insulin? Female athletes have lost nearly 900 medals to transgender rivals competing against them in women’s sporting categories, an eye-opening United Nations report has revealed. The study — titled “Violence against women and girls in sports” — stated that more than 600 female athletes have been bested at various events by competitors who were born male. “According to information received, by 30 March 2024, over 600 female athletes in more than 400 competitions have lost more than 890 medals in 29 different sports,” the report said.
"Is he saying women and girls should give up their sporting places, dreams and scholarships so people can have insulin?" - NO, he obviously isn't saying this. It's not nice to twist people's words.
Load More Replies...He was being sarcastic and calling out the ridiculousness of the fact politicians seem to be very vocal when trampling on the rights of others but will sit on their hands when it comes to fighting for meaningful legislation that will stop bloodsucking pharmaceutical companies preying on the sick and disabled.
Never has an issue had more 'whataboutery' devoted to it than those surrounding trans people. This was well said and sympathetically said.
Despite your best attempts, sometimes the things will still hit the fan. If this happens and you find your reputation rapidly heading for the drain, the experts advise that you do damage control as fast as possible. Here's what Reputation911 suggests you do when things go south...
First, do some research to figure out the extent of the damage so you know what you're dealing with. "If a post leads to unexpected backlash, the first step is to assess whether removing it is the best course of action. Deleting a post doesn’t erase screenshots, but it can help de-escalate the situation," says DiAntonio.
"If the reaction is minor, it may be best to let it pass. However, if the post has gone viral, addressing it head-on, through an apology or clarification, may be necessary. The key is to avoid defensive responses that fuel further criticism. Seeking professional reputation management guidance can also help in cases where significant damage control is needed."
And considering that they are trying to get the f*****g polio vaccine permit revoked, I think smart people will be wearing masks!!
The agency advises that if you are at fault for the situation, you need to make amends. This means issuing a statement apologizing for any wrongdoings that have affected customers, stakeholders, and others.
But the experts say simply issuing an apology is not enough. You need to create a long-term recovery plan. If you just say that you will do better, people won’t trust you. Instead, you have to show them that you are doing better, warns Reputation911.
The company says the next step is to proactively communicate any changes you have made to address the issues with your audience. And then to make it a priority to follow through on any commitments you have made. Consistency helps to rebuild trust with your audience, adds the team. But be patient because the recovery process doesn’t happen overnight, and can often take a long time.
The two on the right also could be Sarah Wagenknecht and Alice Weidel in Germany.
We asked DiAntonio what someone should do if they notice negative posts or content about themselves online. "The best approach depends on the nature of the content," replied the expert. "If it's defamatory or violates platform guidelines, it may be possible to have it removed. If removal isn't an option, investing in suppression strategies, such as publishing positive content to push negative results down in search rankings, can help."
DiAntonio says sometimes it pays to seek professional help. "Legal options may also be available in cases of harassment or false claims," he told us. "Most importantly, staying calm and responding strategically, rather than reacting emotionally, is crucial to minimizing long-term reputational damage."
And, of course, remember: prevention is always better than cure!
They mean divorced (because of his cheating) father of two (ages 16 and 19 years old). Of course the sensational press wants to make it out his devastated wife and two small kids are waiting at home for him never to return. YUCK
While it is fiction read Robert Heinlein's FRIDAY. It gives a view of what corporate control of the world looks like up to and including limited nuclear war as internal nuclear war between rival groups within one corporation.
you mean the Vaccine that has helped eradicate polio what is wrong with him
Sarcastic joke here (not reality): for the security of everybody in the women's lockerroom, a male bouncer will check everybody's genitalia thouroughly by touch-examining them. Don't you feel safe and comfortable now.
That's what it looks like. I'm American. I did not vote for Trump. I am sickened by what's becoming of this country.
Maybe a 46k medevac bill to a trama center being denied? Or perhaps a 6k copay for dental surgery?
For the first time in 2 decades, no woman will lead a House committee.
And by "The World" it is largely USA, while the rest of us scramble to save what we can because the US elected a d******r funded by a psychopath. I wonder if there will be someone complaining about the US being dissed. This will be my last comment in a while, I'll be back if BoredPanda goes back to being a European website.
Look on the bright side - problems here in Europe now seem considerably smaller and more manageable, by comparison ;)
Load More Replies...Cancelled a surgery at the beginning of this week because I no longer qualify for financial assistance (disability--get yhis--now pays too much) and Medicare leaves me with about $1200 in residual costs (PT three times a week for three months). Murica!
I'm in a similar predicament 😞 I didn't vote for the Orange man either time because I knew it was going to be bad for everyone who is not independently wealthy
Trump, a man who bought his way out of military service, is sending innocent refugee people into a war zone. Says all about the USA you need to know.
Look up the studies that show most of these billionaire CEO's are psychopaths.
Good stuff. I’d seen all of these elsewhere, but BP reaches a different audience, so I appreciate it.
Don't recall seeing any nakedly partisan political content 3 months ago.
S glad I live in uk lol it’s not brilliant per se but dam it’s better than the USA any day of the week ! Your own fault for voting in that nasty pos ooomp Loompa homophobic misogynist ashole !
All of that was devastatingly accurate and for the most part was originally posted by Americans. You are clearly part of the problem if you think the world shouldn't criticize the US. As an American I couldn't be more disappointed that we're now Murica, home of the easily-offended mouthbreathers who think they're exceptionally manly men. Your sad little post unironically accepts that our once revered nation is now the low hanging fruit of .
"LiBeRaL eChO cHaMbEr" buddy your president has said "they're eating the cats and dogs" over 100 times.
And by "The World" it is largely USA, while the rest of us scramble to save what we can because the US elected a d******r funded by a psychopath. I wonder if there will be someone complaining about the US being dissed. This will be my last comment in a while, I'll be back if BoredPanda goes back to being a European website.
Look on the bright side - problems here in Europe now seem considerably smaller and more manageable, by comparison ;)
Load More Replies...Cancelled a surgery at the beginning of this week because I no longer qualify for financial assistance (disability--get yhis--now pays too much) and Medicare leaves me with about $1200 in residual costs (PT three times a week for three months). Murica!
I'm in a similar predicament 😞 I didn't vote for the Orange man either time because I knew it was going to be bad for everyone who is not independently wealthy
Trump, a man who bought his way out of military service, is sending innocent refugee people into a war zone. Says all about the USA you need to know.
Look up the studies that show most of these billionaire CEO's are psychopaths.
Good stuff. I’d seen all of these elsewhere, but BP reaches a different audience, so I appreciate it.
Don't recall seeing any nakedly partisan political content 3 months ago.
S glad I live in uk lol it’s not brilliant per se but dam it’s better than the USA any day of the week ! Your own fault for voting in that nasty pos ooomp Loompa homophobic misogynist ashole !
All of that was devastatingly accurate and for the most part was originally posted by Americans. You are clearly part of the problem if you think the world shouldn't criticize the US. As an American I couldn't be more disappointed that we're now Murica, home of the easily-offended mouthbreathers who think they're exceptionally manly men. Your sad little post unironically accepts that our once revered nation is now the low hanging fruit of .
"LiBeRaL eChO cHaMbEr" buddy your president has said "they're eating the cats and dogs" over 100 times.