IKEA Asks People To Bully This Plant For 30 Days To See What Happens, And Results Are Eyeopening
Community member
Bully a plant, a live experiment with two IKEA plants and with thousands of children, to help to raise awareness around Anti-Bullying Day on 4th May in the Middle East.
The live experiment involved IKEA taking two of its very own plants and installing them at the school, where one plant was fed compliments and words of encouragement, while the other was verbally bullied with hateful words. The students were encouraged to record their own voices to share their love with the first plant and give words of criticism to the second, either first hand or via social media interaction. After 30 days, the results spoke for themselves – while the complimented plant continued to thrive, the bullied plant was visibly struggling, and looking dull with droopy brown leaves.
Both plants were treated strictly the same: with the same amount water. Exposed with of sunlight, water and fertiliser. The only difference being, we said words of criticism to one plant, and words of encouragement to the other, for a span of 30 days. By the end of the experiment, the impressive results spoke for themselves.
More info: youtu.be
What would happen if you bullied a plant for 30 days straight?
IKEA decided to test it out to help raise awareness around Anti-Bullying Day on 4th May in the Middle East
They placed two of their plants in a school
Where one plant was fed compliments and words of encouragement
While the other was verbally bullied with hateful words
ADVERTISEMENTBoth plants were treated strictly the same
They both received the same amount of water, sunlight and fertilizer
The end result speaks for itself
Watch this video to see the experiment in detail:
Here’s what people had to say about the project
Anyone can write on Bored Panda. Start writing!
Follow Bored Panda on Google News!
Follow us on Flipboard.com/@boredpanda!
1Mviews
Share on FacebookJessica Jones
Author, Community member
This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.
Pretty sure this is b******t and they probably just didn't water the "bullied" one properly to keep up the illusion. Plants don't hear and understand human languages - if you say something to a plant, it doesn't know if you're insulting it.
I heard a theory that they grow better when someone speaks to them, because they get bigger amount of Carbon dioxide that's being breathed out :P
Load More Replies...but they were covered by a box.... But it would be true if it wasnt covered
Maybe people were nice for once and didn't want to buLlysfaen the plant so much? lol?
The mythbusters did this experiment and used music and also was angry towards a few plants and nice/encouraging to the others. They had the same results. Obviously plants don't speak human, but they sense energy apparently.
Here's the actual mythbusters story: http://www.discovery.com/tv-shows/mythbusters/mythbusters-database/talking-to-plants/ They used recordings of good words and bad words and a control set of plants that had no sounds at all. After 60 days of the recordings on repeat, both good and bad words plants grew the same amount, but they grew more than the silent plants. So it seems plants respond to noise in their environment, but that's all.
Agreed. And you have to be a human to know that plants don't have ears, eyeballs, or brains. Or any kind of nervous system whatsoever. More to the point, we already know exactly where this foolish notion comes from. A guy named Gustav made it all up in 1848. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant_perception_(paranormal) Screen-Sho...fc-png.jpg
Can you prove that? They have intelligence, it's just different than human intelligence.
Intelligence is not required for an emotional response. A nervous system, however, is unequivocally required, and plants do not have one.
Well: Chamovitz, D. (2012). What a plant knows: a field guide to the senses. Scientific American/Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Plants are less numb and dumb than we might imagine. If of course cannot be bullied by words. Saying "Dumb plant" will have the same effect as saying "clever plant". Whether a subtle influence might be given is hard to assess but in a larger controller study. In this Ikea case, it might be as little as employess not even deliberately treatening the bullied plant not as good as the other one, because they themselves believed in the message behind this campaign.
@ ulrike: I don‘t think that this experiment would harm ikea even if someone shows how fake this was - because this is about the message. And the message is, don‘t bully other people. And this is a good intention, even if the experiment is fake. Ikea is not a company that works for science, even when they sell you experiments of physics by putting not enough screws and stuff.
Understand your point. Of course they don’t understand words (pffff, who knows) but I believe in the transport of positive/negative energy between any kind of living thing... so that does not seem too stupid too me. (Btw I believe IKEA is a too big company to stupidly set up a fake experiment like this. There would be always someone to see that it is fake - and put it somewhere on the public - which would do them more bad than good....)
Please see my comment above. It is now scientifically proven that we have an effect on the physical world with our words and thoughts.
It's also scientifically proven that *science doesn't prove things* — it determines the most probable outcome based on available empirical evidence. And that outcome must be falsifiable (i.e., subject to conditions which would establish its invalidity) in order to be considered scientifically valid. This is why even the greatest discoveries of science (e.g. gravity, relativity, evolution) are still only given the title of "Theories." Nothing is ever "proven" — the door is always left open for someone to come and debunk any idea, no matter how well regarded. That's what makes science work. You want a proof of something, go do math. Screen-Sho...33-png.jpg
Perhaps people release different pheromones when they are angry than when they are happy that could affect the plant. Perhaps they can be affected by different frequencies of sound. Perhaps there's some other mechanism that we don't understand yet. Just because we don't know how it works right off the bat doesn't automatically mean it's fake.
The corollary to this is there's no reason to believe in an extraordinary claim if there is no solid evidence that the claim is accurate. And in this specific case, we already know that the idea that plants have an emotional reaction originates in uncontrolled, pseudoscientific experiments that have since been thoroughly debunked. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant_perception_(paranormal)#cite_note-Galston_1981-1
Actually, there's a field of science that studies the effects of sound/wave energy, etc. It's proven that the frequencies of sound actually have "physical" impact on the environment. Especially, our everyday words! This is fascinating, because it ties two things together: 1) The law of attraction (theory or not), and 2) the biblical account of the words of Jesus spoken to the fig tree... You are free to your opinion, however, I do believe that sound frequencies (on whatever plane of this existence realm), especially through our own use of everyday language, coming from our positive or negative thought processes, DOES produce physical results in this world. Lastly, you have to understand, that nothing in this reality has been created without the fact that some human thought about it. So, please do some introspection into the use of your words, and make them kind and encouraging. Because, well... "the universe and it's creator knows". Peace!
Actually, there's a field of science that studies the effects of sound/wave energy, etc. It's proven that the frequencies of sound actually have "physical" impact on the environment. Especially, our everyday words! This is fascinating, because it ties two things together: 1) The law of attraction (theory or not), and 2) the biblical account of the words of Jesus spoken to the fig tree... You are free to your opinion, however, I do believe that sound frequencies (on whatever plane of this existence realm), especially through our own use of everyday language, coming from our positive or negative thought processes, DOES produce physical results in this world. Lastly, you have to understand, that nothing in this reality has been created without the fact that some human thought about it. So, please do some introspection into the use of your words, and make them kind and encouraging. Because, well... "the universe knows". Peace!
Can you source anything to back up your theory that it makes no difference? I've heard of this experiment since I was a child and although I have never personally done it I was always taught the results were similar to what you see in this article and I'm part of the generation before bullying was seen as a terrible issue. The one who was taught to stand up for yourself and the school wouldn't suspend you if you were just defending yourself.
I could try to find it, but it just makes no sense with what we know about the physical world. Plants don't understand human languages, words don't have magic emotion powers within them (one has to understand the words, or surrounding body language to understand the emotion behind them) therefore, plants won't grow poorly because you say mean things to them. You don't need a scientific study, there simply is no mechanism through which this world be possible.
Read the wiki on the subject. You'll find it quite illuminating. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant_perception_(paranormal)#cite_note-Galston_1981-1
Beautifully sure this is not BS. There has been data about this for over 40 years .
They've done similar experiments with one being played classical music while another was played heavy metal. They react to their surroundings
That may not be true. While a plant can't speak English, it is thought that they are able to "understand" stress hormones, since plant stress hormones are very similar to those of many animals (something often used by plants themselves as a defense mechanism). Aggressive behavior often produces stress hormones. Of course, it's only a single study. Further studies could investigate whether stress hormones are the common factor, or whether the whole study was borked.
It may even be evolutionarily-advantageous for a plant to perceive stress hormones from animals. A plant that can do so can react to coming droughts from areas beyond it's standard "senses" by reacting to migrating animals (simply by the concentration of stress-hormones: more concentration means the drought is closer.) Of course, the plant doesn't know this, all it knows is that other things are stressed and that it is a good time to begin conserving energy and shedding unneeded parts.
Its called the law of vibration. Vibration: a person's emotional state, the atmosphere of a place, or the associations of an object, as communicated to and felt by others. Everything is composed of energy, including thoughts and emotions. Nicolas Tesla is said to have stated, “If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration ." The plants may not hear the words spoken to them, nor have the capacity to interpret the world beyond whatever senses they possesses. They are however, exposed to the energy projected upon them. Make of that what you will. http://attractionlawof.com/applying-the-law-of-vibration/ https://lawsoftheuniverse.weebly.com/law-of-vibration.html
I just logged in to call you and a*****e..."master" Markus. ...A*****e.
F**k u a*****e, sorry for bullying you but you don’t seem to understand the meaning of this, so go take a hike you hatter
No, plants dont understand words, but the understand vibration and energy. Energy I'd undeniable. You've heard of the phrases, "you could cut the tension with a knife". That's because Energy transfers. Every living beingpick
Sure, energy is expended when you talk, and that creates things like sound and heat, but like... emotions don't have energy. They aren't radiation. The idea of tense situations exist because of things like "recognizing body language (or not being able to)" not "the words are imbued with an aura".
This is very likely an anomaly rather than an accurate experiment. First, there is no control (like another plant that is not being spoken to at all). Second, there are not enough of each variable for an accurate data collection. In order for this to be an accurate experiment, it needs to be able to be recreated by other people many times over. If it can be recreated again and again with the same results, then we could reasonably say this actually works. However, what you see here is anecdotal and may or may not actually work.
Load More Replies...It's not luck. It was a 1/3 chance outcome. Either Plant A is better, Plant B is better, or they are the same. It has probably been replicated many times but you don't hear about the experiments where the plant that was subject to "bullying" faired better. It's called the "file drawer effect".
The only way I could see it working is if they didn't give the bullied plant something that the other plant was getting and lied about it. The point was to make kids understand not to bully someone else, I don't think that the reason the plant wilted was because of mean words.
I got your peer-reviewed science right here. It's been thoroughly debunked over the course of many replicated experiments. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant_perception_(paranormal)#cite_note-Galston_1981-1
I have other comments in this comment section, but basically: Plants can't understand human language. Words are not magical and do not carry emotions in them. Plants can't understand human emotions. Therefore, doing this cannot produce any results related to what you say to the plants (there's evidence that CO2 or sound waves from speaking can have effects, but the words and intentions behind the words, no).
PLEASE go and watch MythBusters' episode about an accurate experiment they did on this subject.
PLEASE go read the actual science. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant_perception_(paranormal)#cite_note-Galston_1981-1 Screen-Sho...57-png.jpg
Pretty sure this is b******t and they probably just didn't water the "bullied" one properly to keep up the illusion. Plants don't hear and understand human languages - if you say something to a plant, it doesn't know if you're insulting it.
I heard a theory that they grow better when someone speaks to them, because they get bigger amount of Carbon dioxide that's being breathed out :P
Load More Replies...but they were covered by a box.... But it would be true if it wasnt covered
Maybe people were nice for once and didn't want to buLlysfaen the plant so much? lol?
The mythbusters did this experiment and used music and also was angry towards a few plants and nice/encouraging to the others. They had the same results. Obviously plants don't speak human, but they sense energy apparently.
Here's the actual mythbusters story: http://www.discovery.com/tv-shows/mythbusters/mythbusters-database/talking-to-plants/ They used recordings of good words and bad words and a control set of plants that had no sounds at all. After 60 days of the recordings on repeat, both good and bad words plants grew the same amount, but they grew more than the silent plants. So it seems plants respond to noise in their environment, but that's all.
Agreed. And you have to be a human to know that plants don't have ears, eyeballs, or brains. Or any kind of nervous system whatsoever. More to the point, we already know exactly where this foolish notion comes from. A guy named Gustav made it all up in 1848. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant_perception_(paranormal) Screen-Sho...fc-png.jpg
Can you prove that? They have intelligence, it's just different than human intelligence.
Intelligence is not required for an emotional response. A nervous system, however, is unequivocally required, and plants do not have one.
Well: Chamovitz, D. (2012). What a plant knows: a field guide to the senses. Scientific American/Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Plants are less numb and dumb than we might imagine. If of course cannot be bullied by words. Saying "Dumb plant" will have the same effect as saying "clever plant". Whether a subtle influence might be given is hard to assess but in a larger controller study. In this Ikea case, it might be as little as employess not even deliberately treatening the bullied plant not as good as the other one, because they themselves believed in the message behind this campaign.
@ ulrike: I don‘t think that this experiment would harm ikea even if someone shows how fake this was - because this is about the message. And the message is, don‘t bully other people. And this is a good intention, even if the experiment is fake. Ikea is not a company that works for science, even when they sell you experiments of physics by putting not enough screws and stuff.
Understand your point. Of course they don’t understand words (pffff, who knows) but I believe in the transport of positive/negative energy between any kind of living thing... so that does not seem too stupid too me. (Btw I believe IKEA is a too big company to stupidly set up a fake experiment like this. There would be always someone to see that it is fake - and put it somewhere on the public - which would do them more bad than good....)
Please see my comment above. It is now scientifically proven that we have an effect on the physical world with our words and thoughts.
It's also scientifically proven that *science doesn't prove things* — it determines the most probable outcome based on available empirical evidence. And that outcome must be falsifiable (i.e., subject to conditions which would establish its invalidity) in order to be considered scientifically valid. This is why even the greatest discoveries of science (e.g. gravity, relativity, evolution) are still only given the title of "Theories." Nothing is ever "proven" — the door is always left open for someone to come and debunk any idea, no matter how well regarded. That's what makes science work. You want a proof of something, go do math. Screen-Sho...33-png.jpg
Perhaps people release different pheromones when they are angry than when they are happy that could affect the plant. Perhaps they can be affected by different frequencies of sound. Perhaps there's some other mechanism that we don't understand yet. Just because we don't know how it works right off the bat doesn't automatically mean it's fake.
The corollary to this is there's no reason to believe in an extraordinary claim if there is no solid evidence that the claim is accurate. And in this specific case, we already know that the idea that plants have an emotional reaction originates in uncontrolled, pseudoscientific experiments that have since been thoroughly debunked. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant_perception_(paranormal)#cite_note-Galston_1981-1
Actually, there's a field of science that studies the effects of sound/wave energy, etc. It's proven that the frequencies of sound actually have "physical" impact on the environment. Especially, our everyday words! This is fascinating, because it ties two things together: 1) The law of attraction (theory or not), and 2) the biblical account of the words of Jesus spoken to the fig tree... You are free to your opinion, however, I do believe that sound frequencies (on whatever plane of this existence realm), especially through our own use of everyday language, coming from our positive or negative thought processes, DOES produce physical results in this world. Lastly, you have to understand, that nothing in this reality has been created without the fact that some human thought about it. So, please do some introspection into the use of your words, and make them kind and encouraging. Because, well... "the universe and it's creator knows". Peace!
Actually, there's a field of science that studies the effects of sound/wave energy, etc. It's proven that the frequencies of sound actually have "physical" impact on the environment. Especially, our everyday words! This is fascinating, because it ties two things together: 1) The law of attraction (theory or not), and 2) the biblical account of the words of Jesus spoken to the fig tree... You are free to your opinion, however, I do believe that sound frequencies (on whatever plane of this existence realm), especially through our own use of everyday language, coming from our positive or negative thought processes, DOES produce physical results in this world. Lastly, you have to understand, that nothing in this reality has been created without the fact that some human thought about it. So, please do some introspection into the use of your words, and make them kind and encouraging. Because, well... "the universe knows". Peace!
Can you source anything to back up your theory that it makes no difference? I've heard of this experiment since I was a child and although I have never personally done it I was always taught the results were similar to what you see in this article and I'm part of the generation before bullying was seen as a terrible issue. The one who was taught to stand up for yourself and the school wouldn't suspend you if you were just defending yourself.
I could try to find it, but it just makes no sense with what we know about the physical world. Plants don't understand human languages, words don't have magic emotion powers within them (one has to understand the words, or surrounding body language to understand the emotion behind them) therefore, plants won't grow poorly because you say mean things to them. You don't need a scientific study, there simply is no mechanism through which this world be possible.
Read the wiki on the subject. You'll find it quite illuminating. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant_perception_(paranormal)#cite_note-Galston_1981-1
Beautifully sure this is not BS. There has been data about this for over 40 years .
They've done similar experiments with one being played classical music while another was played heavy metal. They react to their surroundings
That may not be true. While a plant can't speak English, it is thought that they are able to "understand" stress hormones, since plant stress hormones are very similar to those of many animals (something often used by plants themselves as a defense mechanism). Aggressive behavior often produces stress hormones. Of course, it's only a single study. Further studies could investigate whether stress hormones are the common factor, or whether the whole study was borked.
It may even be evolutionarily-advantageous for a plant to perceive stress hormones from animals. A plant that can do so can react to coming droughts from areas beyond it's standard "senses" by reacting to migrating animals (simply by the concentration of stress-hormones: more concentration means the drought is closer.) Of course, the plant doesn't know this, all it knows is that other things are stressed and that it is a good time to begin conserving energy and shedding unneeded parts.
Its called the law of vibration. Vibration: a person's emotional state, the atmosphere of a place, or the associations of an object, as communicated to and felt by others. Everything is composed of energy, including thoughts and emotions. Nicolas Tesla is said to have stated, “If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration ." The plants may not hear the words spoken to them, nor have the capacity to interpret the world beyond whatever senses they possesses. They are however, exposed to the energy projected upon them. Make of that what you will. http://attractionlawof.com/applying-the-law-of-vibration/ https://lawsoftheuniverse.weebly.com/law-of-vibration.html
I just logged in to call you and a*****e..."master" Markus. ...A*****e.
F**k u a*****e, sorry for bullying you but you don’t seem to understand the meaning of this, so go take a hike you hatter
No, plants dont understand words, but the understand vibration and energy. Energy I'd undeniable. You've heard of the phrases, "you could cut the tension with a knife". That's because Energy transfers. Every living beingpick
Sure, energy is expended when you talk, and that creates things like sound and heat, but like... emotions don't have energy. They aren't radiation. The idea of tense situations exist because of things like "recognizing body language (or not being able to)" not "the words are imbued with an aura".
This is very likely an anomaly rather than an accurate experiment. First, there is no control (like another plant that is not being spoken to at all). Second, there are not enough of each variable for an accurate data collection. In order for this to be an accurate experiment, it needs to be able to be recreated by other people many times over. If it can be recreated again and again with the same results, then we could reasonably say this actually works. However, what you see here is anecdotal and may or may not actually work.
Load More Replies...It's not luck. It was a 1/3 chance outcome. Either Plant A is better, Plant B is better, or they are the same. It has probably been replicated many times but you don't hear about the experiments where the plant that was subject to "bullying" faired better. It's called the "file drawer effect".
The only way I could see it working is if they didn't give the bullied plant something that the other plant was getting and lied about it. The point was to make kids understand not to bully someone else, I don't think that the reason the plant wilted was because of mean words.
I got your peer-reviewed science right here. It's been thoroughly debunked over the course of many replicated experiments. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant_perception_(paranormal)#cite_note-Galston_1981-1
I have other comments in this comment section, but basically: Plants can't understand human language. Words are not magical and do not carry emotions in them. Plants can't understand human emotions. Therefore, doing this cannot produce any results related to what you say to the plants (there's evidence that CO2 or sound waves from speaking can have effects, but the words and intentions behind the words, no).
PLEASE go and watch MythBusters' episode about an accurate experiment they did on this subject.
PLEASE go read the actual science. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant_perception_(paranormal)#cite_note-Galston_1981-1 Screen-Sho...57-png.jpg
512
251