30 Fantastic Roles That Got Absolutely Ruined By The Wrong Actor
Interview With ExpertCasting movies and running auditions is an incredibly responsible job. You essentially have to find talented individuals whom you can see bringing the characters and the script to life in the best way possible. Not only that but casting the lead means picking someone who can be the face of the entire franchise. That can mean going through countless rounds of auditions and interviews while you evaluate hundreds, if not thousands, of potential actors.
And even then, after so much trouble, the audience doesn’t always think the actors embody the characters well enough. There’s a disconnect somewhere. The r/AskReddit community was candid about what iconic film roles they personally thought were miscast. Scroll down to see their opinions, and let us know in the comments whether or not you agree with them.
We got in touch with the author of the viral thread, u/LuckyLaceyKS, for a chat about miscast roles. Meanwhile, Bored Panda also reached out to entertainment, pop culture, and lifestyle expert Mike Sington for his thoughts about the challenges that casting directors run into. Read on for both of our interviews!
This post may include affiliate links.
We got in touch with the author of the viral thread, u/LuckyLaceyKS, for a chat about miscast roles. Meanwhile, Bored Panda also reached out to entertainment, pop culture, and lifestyle expert Mike Sington for his thoughts about the challenges that casting directors run into. Read on for both of our interviews!
Redditor u/LuckyLaceyKS, who sparked the entire online discussion, told Bored Panda that they're a huge fan of the popular 'Uncharted' video game series. The franchise even spawned a movie in 2022. However, u/LuckyLaceyKS thought that Mark Wahlberg was miscast as Sully in it. That was the initial inspiration for the thread.
"It's hard when you have a connection to a franchise before the movie comes out. People can be very passionate about their favorite franchises and their fancast preferences, which is why I think the post got as much attention as it did. I didn't expect so many comments!" they said.
Jack black should have been the genie in the live action Aladdin and I will die on this hill.
Kristen Stewart in Snow White and the Huntsman.
For the entirety of the movie, I kept wondering in which universe would Kristen Stewart be fairer than Charlize Theron??
Jessie eisnburg as lex luthor.
Too young, too much hair, too much manic crazy psychotic terrorist professor to be Lex. Let is supposed to be calculating and calm to the extreme. At least on the outside.
Someone else that the OP thought was definitely miscast was legendary actor Tom Hanks in 'Elvis.' According to the redditor, it's a "hard pill to swallow" because Hanks is such a powerful and capable actor. "This role and accent were just not a great fit for him," they said.
On the flip side, the author (just like us!) was a big fan of Meryl Streep's iconic portrayal of Miranda Priestly in 'The Devil Wears Prada.' Streep is, without a doubt, a force to be reckoned with on the screen, but u/LuckyLaceyKS said that "she owned this role and exceeded the expectations of the character's portrayal in the book." They added: "Absolutely iconic."
Another favorite of the author’s is Christoph Waltz’s acting in ‘Inglourious Basterds.’ "He was a scene stealer in an incredible film with a wildly talented cast. That's a hard feat to accomplish."
For u/LuckyLaceyKS, actors who take their time to do their research are a big favorite. "From studying mannerisms of subjects for biopics to doing hard work like working in kitchens for chef roles, I think it's more believable when you immerse yourself in the subject before filming. I love that Jeremy Allen White and Ayo Edebiri spent so much time in kitchens before filming ‘The Bear.‘”
This one is more Tim Burton's fault, but Johnny Depp made an *awful* Wonka.
There was only one, there is only one, there shall be only one Wonka. ETCETERA ETCETERA! Gene.
I always felt Gwenyth Paltrow as Pepper Potts didn't fit. I don't know what Pepper was like in the comics, but she seemed to have very little chemistry with RDJ in my opinion. Maybe I just hate her for all the voodoo she tries to sell tho.
Considering she denies ever being part of the films, I wholeheartedly agree. Now she’s telling rich folks to live off bone broth and makes candles that supposedly smell like her vagina.
Emma Watson as Belle in Beauty and the Beast.
She's got the looks down, but her singing is meh to the point they had to autotune it and it sounds weird. Her acting is also stiff and fretful and she doesn't have any chemistry with any of the other actors, let alone Beast. There were better choices for the role.
Meanwhile, Bored Panda spoke to entertainment expert Mike Sington, aka Hollywood's Ultimate Insider, about casting challenges and how actors can connect with the audience more. He told us that casting the perfect actor can make or break a production. First, you need an actor with the right skills and experience for the role. "They should be able to embody the character's emotions, motivations, and even physicality," he told us.
However, one issue is that actors who look exactly like the characters might not have the strongest acting skills. Moreover, actors with the most talent may look nothing like the characters they need to depict. So, casting directors are on the lookout for a balance between the two: they look for the sweet spot between appearance and talent.
"Sifting through mountains of auditions can be overwhelming, but having a limited pool of actors can also restrict the creative vision," Sington said. "So, how do casting directors make the tough call?"
According to the entertainment expert, multiple rounds of auditions with different scenes and scenarios can really help assess actors’ range and how able they are to adapt to different situations. It's also vital to see how the actor interacts with the rest of the cast. "The right actors will bounce off each other naturally," Sington said that they'll create on-screen relationships that the audience will think are believable.
Obvious, but necessary mention of Kevin Costner is Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves. I'd say most of the starring roles were miscast, but none as offensively bad as "Kevin Costner plays....Kevin Costner".
How has no one said jake gyllenhall in prince of P E R S I A.
The movie was a loss anyway when it turned into a "Never do this thing!" But the thing ends up saving everyone movie.
George Clooney in Batman & Robin (1997). Only slightly worse than Val Kilmer in Batman Forever (1995). I don't know what it was about the 90's that every big name was signing up to do a one-off as batman, but that was a bad decision.
At the end of the day, casting directors develop an intuition for who to hire to bring characters to life after years of experience. But, Sington warned, even if you take all of these steps, there’s still no guarantee that you’ll make the right choice.
"Sometimes, the magic only happens once the filming starts. But by carefully considering these challenges, casting directors can significantly increase their chances of finding that perfect match."
There's a lot of responsibility resting on the actors' shoulders to connect with the audience, too! Luckily, there are various ways that they can make their performances resonate on a deeper level. For one, authenticity is absolutely essential when it comes to making characters relatable.
"The audience can spot a phony performance a mile away," Sington said, urging actors to embrace vulnerability and draw on real human emotions.
Nathan Drake. That role was and always will be Nathan Fillion's role to play. It's such a shame Hollywood never called. He *wanted* the role. He even financed his own YouTube short film showing what an Uncharted film starring him would be like. Instead we got Tom Holland. I love the guy, but he's not Nathan Drake. And Mark Wahlburg as Sully?! *FUUUUUUCCCCKKKK NOOOOOOO.*
Nathan Fillion’s short movie was actually more like the game and the character. It was excellent. Even the way the camera panned into the gun battle towards the end much the same as the game was an excellent addition
Not that iconic but that girl who played Ginny Weasley in the Harry Potter movies. One of my fave female characters diminished to a dumbed down wallflower. Zero chemistry with Radcliffe.
I think it was more the role and direction than Bonnie Wright's acting and talent but agree the casting could've been better.
Jennifer Lawrence as Mystique. Maybe because I liked Rebecca Romijn’s portrayal, but JL didn’t seem right in that role.
Meanwhile, the actors should genuinely listen to their co-stars, observe their body language, and react to their performances as naturally as possible. Pre-rehearsing reactions can do more harm than good in some cases. Instead, the very best actors allow themselves to be vulnerable in order to connect with their colleagues on screen. This helps draw the audience in, as the viewers empathize with the characters more.
The entertainment expert told Bored Panda that it's key for actors to step into their characters' shoes. "Actors can build a strong backstory, delve into the character's psychology, and use techniques like method acting to truly inhabit the role," he said. Moreover, actors can train their voices and practice their physical and facial expressions to craft a more believable performance.
Not exactly an iconic role but Cameron Diaz in Gangs of New York. Every else nailed it (especially Day Lewis) but she stuck out like a sore thumb.
Adam Driver as Kylo Ren. No way he’s a child of Harrison Ford and Carrie Fisher!
Keanu Reeves in *Bram Stoker's Dracula* I love Keanu, but he was terrible in that role.
I think his casting adds to this absolute fever dream of film. Like, Keanu as Harker? LETS GET WEIRD WITH IT. Why not? lmao
There’s enough pressure to cast roles correctly as it is. But when you think about the possibility that the movie might turn into a multi-sequel-and-decade-spanning franchise, it can paralyze you. Luckily, movie industry professionals have a lot of experience and know how to handle this type of pressure well.
While it’s useful to think about the future, you need to focus on the present. If you only ever worry about potential problems that might pop up in the future, you might miss the issues and opportunities that are happening right under your nose. Unless you’ve signed a contract to make a bunch of sequels already, simply focus on the project and story you have in front of you right now.
Harry Potter’s mom. She’s in like 4 brief blurry flashbacks, can’t you find a red head with blue eyes? (I know it’s green in the book but to match Radcliffe with all the “your mothers eyes” comments).
This is one where the way the person's looks are more important because it's an integral part of the story and because the role itself isn't very much. The actor doesn't really have much to do. At least, in my opinion.
Robert Pattinson as Edward Cullen. People hate on the movies for a lot of valid reasons, but I *constantly* hear “Kristin was so awkward” and nothing about how awful Rob did. Bella is supposed to be awkward. Edward is supposed to be smooth as f**k. The entire movie felt uncomfortable because Robert played Edward really awkward and miserable. I don’t think replacing him would have fixed the movie, but it certainly would have helped with the overall tone.
The simple fact is that good actors are great for the movie business. The more skilled an actor is, the more they can make their character believable. They draw the audience in. They get them to suspend their disbelief. They get them fully immersed in the story. Though a great actor probably cannot salvage a bad script and cheesy dialogue, they can still give a memorable performance and help elevate the overall quality of the project.
Meanwhile, an actor who’s a team player and has a likable personality can add a lot to the team beyond their performance on the set. They can share their experience and give some friendly advice to newcomers in the movie industry. Meanwhile, they can use their authority to motivate their fellow cast members as well!
Ben Affleck as an older, bitter, more violent Batman in Batman V Superman.
Should have been Karl Urban.
Titanic in my opinion just because kate looked like a grown adult next to leo who looked like a teen.
Not incredibly iconic from an American perspective (perhaps moreso in Europe), but Cara Delvigne was so over the top awful in Valerian and City of a Thousand Planets that it just destroyed the movie. The dude who played Valerian was a bit better, but not much. I wanted them both to just. stop. talking.
Both were miscast and had ZERO chemistry. And who casts Dane Dehaan as an action hero?!?! lmaooo
In terms of (nearly) perfect casting decisions, we have to go with Viggo Mortensen as Aragorn in 'The Lord of the Rings' trilogy, as well as Meryl Streep as Miranda Priestly in 'The Devil Wears Prada.'
But what roles do you think were extremely well cast, dear Pandas? On the flip side, what roles do you personally believe completely missed the mark for you and why?
Tell us all about it in the comments.
Kyle Reese in Terminator: Genesys.
Michael Biehn took inspiration from Polish resistance fighters in preparing for the role, and he was a shell-shocked, somewhat emaciated veteran.
Nevermind that. Let's hire some beefed-up lughead who would be on the cover of Men's Health, and would honestly be better cast as a Terminator.
I don’t care if it isn’t out yet, i’ve seen all the trailers and chris pratt as mario is just wrong. some actors just aren’t meant to be good voice actors and chris pratt is one of them. he doesn’t sound like mario, he just sounds like chris pratt.
When I found out he's now also the voice of Garfield I quipped that "one day they will make an animated biopic about me. The lead role of Katie will be voiced by Chris Pratt".
Idris Elba is one of my favorite actors, and was faaaar from the main problem with The Dark Tower, but swapping him and McConaughey would have made a lot of sense to me. I feel like they’d have been a lot better in one another’s roles. McConaughey is an easier sell as a cowboy and I have seen enough to know that Elba will knock any bad guy character out of the park.
That entire film had so many issues, honestly the casting was the least of its problems. It completely missed the mark for the book series.
Robert Langdon in The DaVinci code was awfully miscast. He should have been played by Sam Neill.
Yeah but...it's Tom Hanks. He could be cast as Cleopatra and I wouldn't complain at all.
Jamie, what's his face as Christian grey. Wrong guy.
Ian somerholder would have been better.
Dakota Johnson wasn’t a much better choice either. They were both awful, and no chemistry between them is an understatement - their intense dislike for each other was palpable.
My go to for this question is Samuel L Jackson as Mace Windu. I love the guy, but ‘wise calm monk’ is perhaps the worst role he could ever be cast for. It runs exactly counter to his skills as an actor.
Obviously Meryl Streep would have been prefect in all these roles.
I do agree with some of the above but I don’t see them as bad actors, just that the roles weren’t fitting for them. If I’m to add to this list I’ll definitely add the whole damn Percy Jackson franchise. The two movies that were produced were such a flop that the series fans refused to even acknowledge they exist. Then last year they announced a TV series and I went crazy on hearing this. I’m an adult now but I was such a diehard fan of the Percy Jackson books growing up that it was all I spoke about for years to the point that I lost some friends. Then I saw the trailer for the series. Finally they got the actors ages right, but, I’m sorry their appearances don’t match the book descriptions at all. Watched the series with much apathy only to be proven that it’s so much worse than the previous movie attempts. How hard was it for producers to find actors that fit the character descriptions?! Guess I’ll never see my favorite book series being adapted correctly for a movie/series.
Obviously Meryl Streep would have been prefect in all these roles.
I do agree with some of the above but I don’t see them as bad actors, just that the roles weren’t fitting for them. If I’m to add to this list I’ll definitely add the whole damn Percy Jackson franchise. The two movies that were produced were such a flop that the series fans refused to even acknowledge they exist. Then last year they announced a TV series and I went crazy on hearing this. I’m an adult now but I was such a diehard fan of the Percy Jackson books growing up that it was all I spoke about for years to the point that I lost some friends. Then I saw the trailer for the series. Finally they got the actors ages right, but, I’m sorry their appearances don’t match the book descriptions at all. Watched the series with much apathy only to be proven that it’s so much worse than the previous movie attempts. How hard was it for producers to find actors that fit the character descriptions?! Guess I’ll never see my favorite book series being adapted correctly for a movie/series.