As an aside, does the AI you use actually obtain the copyright permission and/or licensing for the images it sources? If not, using it to generate images may be infringing upon the copyright of the original creators and license holders of the artwork and/or photographs that the AI uses to generate images.

You posted these publicly, on a public forum that allows public comments, not in a G-rated Disney cartoon (nice Thumper quote there, though). Other people have opinions and thoughts, and sometimes, shocking though it may be, they will not align with what you WANT them to be. Additionally, I challenge you to point out precisely where I was "horrible", "nasty", or "vicious". I did not call you names. I did not insult you. I did not even make negative allusions to the quality of the images (aside from Farnsworth's fingers, which ARE wonky and not realistic at all). I pointed out factual observations and my personal opinion about the use of AI, which you do not like or agree with. That does not make what I said "horrible", "nasty", or "vicious". EDIT: You asked why I opened the article. I did so because I love Futurama. The title of this article led me to believe this article contained actual, real artwork created by you. It does not. It contains AI-generated images. I was deceived and misled by your title of the article. But, to wit, I opened the article because I enjoy Futurama and hoped to see some actual creativity on display.

A tad sensitive, are we?