Join the Fun!

You May Also Like:

Final score:

119points

POST

Mimi Kumar 4 years ago

Where did all the windows go

102points

Final score:

114points

POST

Mimi Kumar 4 years ago

Ah nooo, the first one was so pretty

140points

Final score:

103points

POST

idkwhatsmyname 4 years ago

UGLY COLOR PALATTE

129points

Final score:

98points

POST

Tabernus 4 years ago

This is unforgivable

168points

Final score:

95points

POST

Samantha Lomb 4 years ago

Also Russia, but this cladding just clips on so it could be removed and the oдвук building is still under there

33points

Final score:

95points

POST

Tabernus 4 years ago

Birmingham central library .... There's a reason the style is called 'brutalist'

117points

Final score:

77points

POST

GeoSushi 4 years ago

WHY!!!

78points

Final score:

74points

POST

leafy_tree 4 years ago

wow, so spiky

58points

#10

Final score:

69points

POST

Popcorn Colonel 4 years ago

OMG! The first pic was really cute! Why would ANYONE do such a thing?

103points

#11

Final score:

62points

POST

ShawtyCantComeToThePhone 4 years ago

hey janice let's replace this beautiful building with a yellow block

92points

doneisdone 4 years ago

People actually go to school to learn how to design blocks. Sad

8points

Lyra Fortune 4 years ago

What a great idea greg!

4points

Aragorn II Elessar 4 years ago

No. Neon yellow. Immediately.

3points

Aunt Messy 4 years ago

Let's just leave the hole the bomb made and let the bodies rot inside.

3points

Kathryn Baylis 4 years ago

A fugly mustard colored box.

1point

Norah Pattison 4 years ago

....block of cheese.

1point

pansexualandproud 4 years ago

oof

1point

Neva Nevičica 4 years ago

Let's make it from legos, Steve!

0points

Marco Conti 4 years ago

Once again, what little character the old building had, was obliterated by the same people that design the Amazon Prime boxes.

4points

Wyndmere 4 years ago

No artistry here

4points

Raine Soo 4 years ago

One word: UGH.

4points

Bobby Stahr 4 years ago

UGLY

4points

Mimi Kumar 4 years ago

Why Yellow!

4points

Joyous Cat Birb 4 years ago

that shade isn't the best choice for a building

4points

Alyssa Fry 4 years ago

*shudder*

3points

Stephanie Did It 4 years ago

From charming to alarming!

3points

Elaine Dodge 1 year ago

What moron would do this? What moronic town council would allow it?

0points

SuePrew 3 years ago

All those beautiful windows :(

0points

klatula 3 years ago

why do all these changes remind me of prison? they have no soul and are not in anyway pleasing to the eye, nor do they seem to make the environment a better place to share spaces. all the art has been totally trashed from this corner.

0points

Jag Yu 3 years ago

i could be mistaken but they couldnt make this building look any more generic even if their souls risk eternal damnation.

0points

Viv Hart 4 years ago

I wonder what the earlier building was, not quite a church.

0points

Mae Mosse 4 years ago

The original was demolished in the 1970’s and the Modernist building built in it’s place. It’s in Oslo, Norway according to the Twitter post

0points

Annette Rainbow 4 years ago

Again just a block, and not a nice one to boot. I am not going to continue as I think they might be more, and I am do over this "let change this beautiful building into a square block". So over it.

0points

Kim Lorton 4 years ago

Oh no! What happened to architectural form?!

0points

Philly Bob Squires 4 years ago

Why replace a beautiful piece of architecture with a plain block? A plain yellow block yet...

0points

OTTER 4 years ago

Forgive them, for they know not what they do

0points

Mickie Shea 4 years ago

they spent so mucho money destroying a wonderful building

0points

Tina Harbour 4 years ago

Yuck....only made worse by the choice of color

0points

Ole Peder Amrud Hagen 4 years ago

Not a renovation either... the original building was torn down in 1972, and it's one of those unneccessary demolitions Oslo has seen far too many of.

0points

Kitty Fenerty 4 years ago

Why? Who approved of this tasteless change?!

0points

Anna D 4 years ago

Why all these storage units?

0points

Ida Johansen 4 years ago

Its actually been painted black now: https://maps.app.goo.gl/6iYDhrVyA57rrXHN9

0points

Paizleypie 4 years ago

Baby $hit yellow

0points

Sent From The Slytherin House 4 years ago

"Hey, you know all of that paint that no one wanted? Well because of that, we got lots of it and I know how to use it!"

0points

Kim 4 years ago

I like this. :)

0points

Sasha Kuleshov 4 years ago

The brickwork! :O

0points

Regina De Vries-Doyen 4 years ago

Horrific

0points

kjorn 4 years ago

looks like it mad of legos :-)

0points

Annie 4 years ago

From a beautiful building with character to an ugly cardboard box : (

0points

Carole Deem 4 years ago

yeah and lose the great windows

0points

Joan OConnor 4 years ago

It looks like a lego block

0points

ArhomR 4 years ago

What’s with all the soulless buildings and that yellow!!

0points

ANNIKAH MARTINEZ 4 years ago

IT LOST ITS SHAPE

0points

COcO BAMa 4 years ago

This is not that bad

0points

HissyFitzz 4 years ago

What if we had a building.. but it was a lego. Great idea Shane, let's do it.

0points

Daune Jaimes Diaz Premium 4 years ago

If a building was a Karen...

0points

Dana Grunwald 4 years ago

Just.... Why???

0points

#12

Final score:

61points

POST

leafy_tree 4 years ago

nooo....they ruined the historical atmosphere

93points

#13

Final score:

50points

POST

ShawtyCantComeToThePhone 4 years ago

What the heck am i looking at

27points

#14

Final score:

46points

POST

Bobby Stahr 4 years ago

Sigh

51points

#15

Final score:

43points

POST

Becklass 4 years ago

It’s like the lovely old building had been eaten by an ugly one.

53points

#16

Final score:

39points

POST

Monika Rhodes 4 years ago

Idk, I kind of like the NOW better.

58points

Dutch Swimmer Goes Viral For Super Revealing Trunks During 2024 Olympics: “Is This Legal?”

See Also on Bored Panda

Thrill-Seeking Diver Jumps Down Extreme Waterslide, Ignoring The Strict Ban For Women

#17

Final score:

38points

POST

Mimi Kumar 4 years ago

The roof of the right building is completely lopsided

16points

#18

Final score:

34points

POST

H Edwards 4 years ago

I like this, doesn't detract from the other houses.

104points

#19

Final score:

30points

POST

H Edwards 4 years ago

I don't mind this one, in fact I think it's an improvement. The original building isn't anything special.

218points

#20

Final score:

30points

POST

ArhomR 4 years ago

Prison block.

47points

#21

Final score:

27points

POST

Raine Soo 4 years ago

X marks the spot. This is Monteal.

26points

#22

Final score:

26points

POST

H Edwards 4 years ago

Nobody would tear down an original Tudor building these days, thankfully.

42points

Neringa is a proud writer at Bored Panda who used to study English and French linguistics. Although she has many different interests, she's particularly drawn to covering stories about pop culture as well as history. While not at the office, this Panda enjoys creepy movies, poetry, photography and learning how to play the piano.

Read less »

What do you think ?

POST

Tabernus 4 years ago

This is a pretty lazy list - many of the original buildings were either bombed or cleared after WW2. In many instances the replacement buildings were put up quickly and cheaply, or were genuinely believed to be cutting edge in the '60's

76points

Kendra Miller 4 years ago

Thank you for clarifying that. Usually in architecture you can see bones and remnants left from the original, but many of these were clearly different.

22points

Monika Soffronow 4 years ago

I so much agree with you because nope, I do not like mindless posts. This one is made for easy outrage and condemnation - without having a single fact presented about the buildings. Where is the building? Is is structurally sound? Is it possible to renovate it? What has it been converted into, i.e. what is it used for? Private or public ownership? North western Europe is littered with disused churches and I cannot see why a much more secular modern society should have to keep every church as it once was. That money is much better spent on health and education, if you ask me.

9points

RaroaRaroa 4 years ago

Yes, someone doesn't know the meaning of 'renovation'. Most of these are replacements.

1point

cybermerlin2000 4 years ago

In the case of the Tamworth ones, it was just pure commercial expansion. A lot of the shops and pubs are still the original Tudor buildings with and are listed buildings now and can't be altered any further

0points

Ivan Wahl 4 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Kel Gal 4 years ago

I imagine that so many of the before buildings were in such bad condition that it was less expensive and safer to tear them down.

39points

Jutta Plötz 10 months ago

Most of them were destroyed during the war

0points

Harley Hoglin 4 years ago

Every photo that shows a building destroyed in WW2 and what replaced it needs to be removed. Comparing what became a bombed out pile of rubble to a new building is bullshit.

37points

Ivan Wahl 4 years ago

If we were misled on even one of the photos it negates the entire premise of the post. Replaced is not renovated and if a major portion of the original building was destroyed and replaced with something else entirely that does not qualify as a renovation either.

15points

Jerry Juneau 3 years ago

Not all of those were not WWII bombed buildings. Besides, in the Atomic age 1950’s-1960’s, many of the 1800-1900’s buildings were razed for modern buildings. We are now seeing things like that happen again where our mid century buildings are outdated, un functional and in many ways, unsafe. It is the natural cycle. Not all buildings are relevant or practical enough to be saved.

0points

GDOY 4 years ago

Not really, I recognize a few from Montreal

0points

Russell Ellwardt 4 years ago

Many of these are not renovations but replacements. This "list" is no list. Totally useless.

11points

Paulina 4 years ago

The title of this post is so misleading 😠 Those are NOT renovations! Most of the pictures show what was in that spot decades ago and then what's there now. Given most of those are from Europe it's safe to say that "before" buildings no longer exist because of the bombings in WW2 or were torn down not much later due to damages.

8points

mph seti 4 years ago

A lot of the time, this is done because there's really no other choice. An old building is falling apart and otherwise unsafe/unusable as is. We don't t know the full stories, here. That said, turning something charming and comfortable into something Brutalist or Minimalist isn't usually a good idea. Especially when it's a result of gentrification driving out people in favor of new, wealthier, people.

4points

Petra Schaap 4 years ago

i kinda like Brutalism... its so ugly and weird that its fascinating... its a part of history now, but I dont understand they thought it was a good idea back then.

1point

Olivia Agave 4 years ago

Most of these were either damaged or destroyed in WW2, or the original structure was unstable after being abandoned for years. Now, if you want something gross that doesn't come under these conditions - Maidstone Museum, listed old mansion house that they cut a hole in and slapped a burning gold and glass structure on the side of. maidstone-...f1baca.jpg

4points

StardustRainO8 4 years ago

I don't know any historcial facts or storys behind these bulidings, but people shuld take a look back and appericate the buliding thats aleready there.

3points

CamlikesCookies 4 years ago

Reverse renovations of bad sims 4 builds.

2points

WilvanderHeijden 4 years ago

A lot of the old buildings got bombed so that's a valid reason to replace them with was considered modern architecture. Sadly even today beautiful buildings get destroyed because a council wants to "step into the future" by building ghastly concrete towers. That's why a lot of cities are so terrible depressing. Grey pavement, grey buildings, black tarmac.

2points

Jungkook Hbdhgs 4 years ago

Sad. After look like The sims 4 buildings

1point

Jungkook Hbdhgs 4 years ago

Need Memories and museum.

1point

Jungkook Hbdhgs 4 years ago (edited)

Sad. Before old building look beautiful and interesting. Lazy after new build. I hate new build like modern buildings. I like vintage and cozy old things.

1point

Shelp 4 years ago

There's a real discrepancy between what architects are taught to find ''beautiful'', and what the people actually like

1point

fainasKeturatis 4 years ago

"renovation" is not building from the foundation on the remains of last building but renewing or "making something look new again". Half of those are not "renovations".

1point

no_name 4 years ago

Let me just point out that not every building survives hundreds of years intact and very often they need to be demolished, and sometimes it happens that during wars buidings (and not just buildings) are destroyed. In those cases, noone creates an exact replica of something once built, but tries to come up with new modern ideas, not necessarily better of prettier, but that's the way it is.

1point

mande.be 4 years ago

List is badly assembled. Because, many of the "older" buildings on the photos were BOMBED OR TEARED DOWN IN WAR! Do not forget that many countries in Europe had to rebuild themselves in a fastest possible time, so many of them are not really well perceived at the time.

1point

lara 4 years ago

In Russia this type of architecture is called "Stalinist." The horrific monster buildings he had built in Moscow are called "The Seven Ugly Sisters".

1point

Petra Schaap 4 years ago

are they considered ugly? I love them! O_O

1point

person (i think) 4 years ago

Dumb list. Most of these are re-builds, not "renovations". Two totally different things.

1point

Tabitha L 4 years ago

A list like this is incomplete without NYC Penn Station before and after. Watch this and have your heart broken - https://youtu.be/_vby82-Z60s

1point

El muerto 4 years ago

many of these are down to destruction during war...but too many horrible examples of bad taste

1point

H Edwards 4 years ago

The Birmingham city centre one was done in the 1970s. From the 1950s to the 1980s there was a lot of this in the UK.

2points

Petra Schaap 4 years ago

@Charlotte: Im so fascinated with what they did in the centre of Stockholm/Sveavägen in the name of city renewing. The Swedes were (among) the first I think. But the glass fountain in Sergelstorget is beautifull.

1point

alexpcorn 4 years ago

El muerto -

0points

Eliyahu Rooff 4 years ago

It's also worth remembering that many old buildings have deteriorated to the point where restoration is prohibitively expensive, even if the original was beautiful. They often don't meet modern safety standards, and would require that builders tear them down to bare bones to retrofit them so they are energy efficient and safe.

0points

Steve Cruz 4 years ago

Photos a century old don't show what state the property was in when it was renovated or replaced. The Regency-era (early 1800s) buildings where the Birmingham City Library (built in the 1950s) had been bombed.

0points

Kitty Fenerty 4 years ago

I wish I hadn’t looked at these pictures. Utterly depressing.

0points

pebs 4 years ago

The title is incorrect: most of these buildings were destroyed by the war and replaced by new buildings, they weren't "renovated".

0points

Dave 4 years ago

These buildings were not renovated, most were torn down and a new building was built!

0points

Elica 4 years ago

Going through the post I was like "what??!" in minion accent for every single one of them...

0points

Jocelyn 4 years ago

i would hardly call most of these "renovations"

0points

Łukasz Markuszewski 4 years ago

As Tabernus said - the WW2 is responsible for most of this devastations. We must also remember, that a lot of old buildings, especially housing, was not very nice to live in - lack of toilets, dark patios, narrow backstreets, lack of elevators - many of them looked nice but during '50 and '60 they were considered unlivable and obscure. This is why they were demolished and replaced with modernist blocks, even though some of the demolishings were controversial back then. In Poland we have a lot of very modern demolishings (the reason is corrupted governments allowing developers to destroy original urban structure), one of the most known is "renovation" of 14th century Dzialdowo Castle. They put styrofoam on it and then colours. Luckily it was stopped and reversed by the old monuments protection institution. See below: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/DR3tIdFbbUWaxCEasghRxhjHn1kgQXRn654uPjS1ogq2k79wbT9TyPuCJ9Vw6pXt5TIxY4_pjTyvr-SSsw

0points

El Dee 4 years ago

Horrific! Slabs of concrete and/or glass that look awful from the outside and are awful to work in too. Made worse by the fact that the previous buildings WERE aesthetically pleasing..

0points

marianne eliza 4 years ago

Now now. I'm sure if the author actually knew what renovation means, they would have chosen differently. But it is so hard to learn new vocabulary.

0points

Data1001 4 years ago

In addition to the point several other comments made, I think a lot of these were gradual changes, as well. It wasn't like overnight they went from a beautiful gothic building to some ugly modern cookie-cutter design. Not to mention that at the time when many of them were built, that style was very common, and probably wasn't thought of as anything outrageously special, so when updates needed to be made, little thought was given to keeping the style of the previous build, which was probably thought to be outdated at the time of the renovation.

0points

David Donaldson 4 years ago

For a contributor that studied English linguistics their understanding of the word "Renovated" leave a lot to be desired.

0points

Perfumista Perfumista 4 years ago

Pre 1964 and current Penn Station in NY should be on here.

0points

Monika Soffronow 4 years ago

This comment has been deleted.

0points

marlene 4 years ago

this was painful to look at

0points

spoklo 4 years ago

marlene like

0points

Rob Chapman 4 years ago

Sometimes this happens in reverse. The Chronicle Building in San Francisco (built in the 1890's), was damaged in the 1906 earthquake & rebuilt by 1915 (very close to it's 1890's appearance). It was modernized in 1962 with an aluminum & glass exterior, and then restored back to it's 1915 appearance in 2014.

0points

Tahani 4 years ago

Sigh

0points

Sandij D 4 years ago

This happens all over especially as real estate/rental costs increase. It is mostly not due to war damage or the inability to renovate. Often the facades of the 'new' buildings are put on top of, next to and over the old building in order to increase the space and, therefore, the $$$ made off each site. Several that I am very familiar with were supposed to be heritage sites - before someone with money and connections came in and snatched the property up.

0points

Julie Johnson 4 years ago

Some people wouldn’t recognise beautiful architecture if it fell on them or the skill and craftsmanship it took to create it.

0points

Lærke Littlebird 4 years ago

It's not renovating if you replace old with new. Renovating means keeping at least some part of the old.

0points

FurryManiac 4 years ago

These make me sad...

0points

ISpiltLipstickInYourValentinoBag 4 years ago

I loved the old buildings! Idk why anyone would want to get rid of them but it would probably be because to make more stuff :(

0points

Leigh Hogan 4 years ago

Most of the time they are in disrepair to the point of dangerous.

2points

Dorothy Cloud 3 years ago

I just quit looking. The new designs were just so unattractive, ugly and truthfully just plain disrespectful!

-1point

Naomi Armitage 4 years ago

Unanimously, ALL the Thens are far superior to the Nows. So sad to lose all that historic beauty.

-3points

Popcorn Colonel 4 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Petra Schaap 4 years ago

or maybe a bomb distroyed the building in the war...

0points

Octavia Hansen 4 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

gaconlongvang2011 4 years ago

Octavia Hansen good

0points

POST

Tabernus 4 years ago

76points

Kendra Miller 4 years ago

Thank you for clarifying that. Usually in architecture you can see bones and remnants left from the original, but many of these were clearly different.

22points

Monika Soffronow 4 years ago

9points

RaroaRaroa 4 years ago

Yes, someone doesn't know the meaning of 'renovation'. Most of these are replacements.

1point

cybermerlin2000 4 years ago

0points

Ivan Wahl 4 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Kel Gal 4 years ago

I imagine that so many of the before buildings were in such bad condition that it was less expensive and safer to tear them down.

39points

Jutta Plötz 10 months ago

Most of them were destroyed during the war

0points

Harley Hoglin 4 years ago

Every photo that shows a building destroyed in WW2 and what replaced it needs to be removed. Comparing what became a bombed out pile of rubble to a new building is bullshit.

37points

Ivan Wahl 4 years ago

15points

Jerry Juneau 3 years ago

0points

GDOY 4 years ago

Not really, I recognize a few from Montreal

0points

Russell Ellwardt 4 years ago

Many of these are not renovations but replacements. This "list" is no list. Totally useless.

11points

Paulina 4 years ago

8points

mph seti 4 years ago

4points

Petra Schaap 4 years ago

i kinda like Brutalism... its so ugly and weird that its fascinating... its a part of history now, but I dont understand they thought it was a good idea back then.

1point

Olivia Agave 4 years ago

4points

StardustRainO8 4 years ago

I don't know any historcial facts or storys behind these bulidings, but people shuld take a look back and appericate the buliding thats aleready there.

3points

CamlikesCookies 4 years ago

Reverse renovations of bad sims 4 builds.

2points

WilvanderHeijden 4 years ago

2points

Jungkook Hbdhgs 4 years ago

Sad. After look like The sims 4 buildings

1point

Jungkook Hbdhgs 4 years ago

Need Memories and museum.

1point

Jungkook Hbdhgs 4 years ago (edited)

Sad. Before old building look beautiful and interesting. Lazy after new build. I hate new build like modern buildings. I like vintage and cozy old things.

1point

Shelp 4 years ago

There's a real discrepancy between what architects are taught to find ''beautiful'', and what the people actually like

1point

fainasKeturatis 4 years ago

"renovation" is not building from the foundation on the remains of last building but renewing or "making something look new again". Half of those are not "renovations".

1point

no_name 4 years ago

1point

mande.be 4 years ago

1point

lara 4 years ago

In Russia this type of architecture is called "Stalinist." The horrific monster buildings he had built in Moscow are called "The Seven Ugly Sisters".

1point

Petra Schaap 4 years ago

are they considered ugly? I love them! O_O

1point

person (i think) 4 years ago

Dumb list. Most of these are re-builds, not "renovations". Two totally different things.

1point

Tabitha L 4 years ago

A list like this is incomplete without NYC Penn Station before and after. Watch this and have your heart broken - https://youtu.be/_vby82-Z60s

1point

El muerto 4 years ago

many of these are down to destruction during war...but too many horrible examples of bad taste

1point

H Edwards 4 years ago

The Birmingham city centre one was done in the 1970s. From the 1950s to the 1980s there was a lot of this in the UK.

2points