ADVERTISEMENT

Beauty is subjective, beauty is in the eye of the beholder—most of us were taught to never judge a book by its cover. Or, more simply put, to not be superficial. However, scientists argue that aesthetic appreciation of beauty is hard-wired into our brains—we can't escape it. Subconsciously or consciously, we all like to look at beautiful creatures, be it an animal, or a building.

Therefore, some people that are more leaning towards traditional architecture are worried that the notion of beauty in buildings is fading away. As cities all over the world are experiencing globalization, the newly designed buildings can sometimes look awfully alike, even if they were built thousands of miles apart. We're all familiar with the glass boxes in the prestigious areas of cities, that, according to some, are lacking that certain kind of charm, or je ne sais quoi, that makes them unique in their own way. But before we get all judgy, we want to let you decide what you think of these building renovations. Bored Panda has made you a list of before and after pictures of some buildings around the world that were renovated in a way that didn't sit right with some people. Do they look good to you? Scroll down below to see them all and tell us your opinion!

You May Also Like:
#6

Szawel Sauliazauras Report

Add photo comments
POST
Samantha Lomb
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Also Russia, but this cladding just clips on so it could be removed and the oдвук building is still under there

View more commentsArrow down menu
#7

Western_Trad Report

Add photo comments
POST
Tabernus
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Birmingham central library .... There's a reason the style is called 'brutalist'

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
#9

City of Toronto Archives Report

Add photo comments
POST
Joonscrab
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Actually I like both of these. I think the angle of the second photo makes it look like that... But up close, it'll look magnificent, especially considering it's a public building.

Load More Replies...
Raine Soo
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I have been to the Royal Ontario Museum. Walking through the front entrance at street level, you don't realize that the building is encased in so much steel and glass. This aerial view makes it look painful. Otherwise, they have well curated exhibits there.

Auburn Mc
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I always thought it looked like the building was throwing up onto the street. Close to Dundas Square, but feels out of place compared to the rest of the block. Definitely, instantly recognizable and agree on the well curated exhibits.

Load More Replies...
Aunt Messy
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's the Royal Ontario Museum, and the old building was tiny by comparison, ugly, and bunker like. This is flat out gorgeous.

Load More Replies...
Khadeja
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Honestly, both are beautiful. I think it's just the angle that makes it look worse, it really looks stunning and like a work of art. Don't see what's wrong with this, it's a marvelous design. :)

Daune Jaimes Diaz
Community Member
Premium
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I like this. It reminds me of the Lou Rovo building in Vegas

Russell Ellwardt
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Daniel Libeskind, right? A master architect. That silly office desk with drawers they had before is certainly worth less than the building they have now. This example does not belong here.

jetsonjoe
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

i remember living in Toronto at this time and everyone was ohhh and ahhh...i was thinking you have got to be kidding and what were they thinking...Still amazed at how awful it looks.

Anne Reid
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Hey, let’s get rid of all the green space and replace it with steel and glass!

Elaine Dodge
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Why did the architect not have the manners to keep his roof from cutting over the old building? No respect.

Erik Skyborn
Community Member
3 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

If they're going to do this, they should have just gotten rid of the whole thing. Keeping part of the old with the new just looks stupid.

Dan Lopez
Community Member
3 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The "now" looks like when your PC graphics are messing up.

klatula
Community Member
3 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

salvador dahli would have been proud..... i don't think the people who live there would like him.

Jag Yu
Community Member
3 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

would be akin to a person who snapped and lost all control of his sanity.

Hugh Walter
Community Member
3 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

That's an architecture students' first year fantasy, how did it get built?

OmMarol
Community Member
3 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

well, the old one doesn't look very pretty, seems like it was something different even before than that

mermaidgirl960
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I do like the modern build, it's interesting, but why do they always leave that one chunk of the old building? It just looks so weird! I get sometimes, there are legal reasons for it, or they're "trying to preserve" the old building but it's just no....

Little Dino
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is actually The Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto. It's really cool and half of the building is the original and the other half is more "modern".

Steve Cruz
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The Denver Art Museum annex is similar, designed by Gio Ponti. He has designed similar structures all over the world and EVERY ONE OF THEM IS A NIGHTMARE: poor interior navigation, leaky, difficult to heat and cool, and reflections onto neighboring buildings can be blinding.

Kathryn Baylis
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

So, they went from large terraces that would allow people to sit under the sun and even plant rather large container gardens to this monstrosity that just looks like a pile of broken glass—-hell, why didn’t they stain some of the glass red to look like the blood of the poor soul who had to clean up after the glass broke.

saynogo
Community Member
3 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's a museum, not a garden. This allows more space for exhibits, instead of planting asparagus. It also attracts more visitors.

Load More Replies...
Brett Layton
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

on the plus side, youll never get a ball stuck on the roof of that place.

El Dee
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

No, this one IS an improvement. It got rid of the brutalist monstrosity at least..

Kate
Community Member
4 years ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

For everyone saying that the second photo is better; it's actually a terrible design because inside there's all these weird jutting walls so the exhibits (it's a nature + history museum) had to be laid out to in very strange configurations to accomodate. Additionally in the original design, inside the bottom 'office drawer' was actually a full size reproduction of one of the terracotta tombs which had to be removed entirely when the crystal was added on to the building.

s. vitkovitsky
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The old entranceway was \ is grand, gold mosaic tiled arched ceiling, balconies from the second floor overlooking the spacious area with its lovely marble floor. But they moved it to the 'crystal' where you can hardly find the right door, some drab small thing right off the street. From the street, this new addition looks like the back portion of a fat hen, and now you have to use the bird,'s back aperture as the entrance.

k1ddkanuck
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Hey that's the ROM! It's actually a pretty cool design. And inside, it's gorgeous.

kira griffin
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

this one isn't too bad, but the first one was still much better.

Kateryna
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I like the original one better, but the "now" one looks pretty cool.

Not PC
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Looks like an artist’s rendering. I hope they gave a hard pass to this one!

Kate
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Terrible; the original building was all beautiful marble and limestone and the new building is all metal walkways and white walls that got haphazardly shoved into the size of the old building (not to mention all the points on the outside match on the inside so there's a lot of weird, narrow triangular corners.)

Load More Replies...
Octavia Hansen
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Even the grass and trees didn't want to stick around. And benches out in the sun, no shade -- it's a concrete wasteland. Hold up a magnifying glass and set me on fire!

Octavia Hansen
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Isn't this the design that Frank Gehry wadded up and threw away, but some underling fished it out of the trash. The corner was missing so that's why part of the original building was spared. Maybe from ground level you can't see how as a whole it does not come together. Taxi! Get me outta here!

ANNIKAH MARTINEZ
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

me seeing then: ok ok cool me seeing now:QUÉ DIABLOS POR QUÉ HARÍAS QUÉ ESTABA BIEN ANTES

COcO BAMa
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

wow it seems the building lanner saw a porcipine this morning .

pansexualandproud
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I bet the people renovating just went like " hey let's make the roof look like broken glass"

*sigh*, The Yellow Teletubby
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

hot take but I actually kind of like the 2nd one :o minus all the concrete, though. They could've kept the green.

Milena Radeva
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The middle section you see on the top photo, is not part of the old classical building. It was also added at some point, but it was badly designed, taking too much space without utilizing it. None of the old building is damaged, just partially incased in the new one. It added a lot more exhibiting space that was needed. This is a bad areal photo. It’s much nicer and interesting from the ground.

Marco Conti
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

OK, so the original wasn't exactly pretty. The replacement, on the other hand, should come with a warning for people prone to seizures. Who signed off on the roof going across the façade of the church? Why?

Candace Fitzpatrick
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

TBH it looks pretty cool from street level, they kept the beautiful parts of the old building and incorporated the glass and metal to give quite a contrasting image.

Jennifer Wood
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

that's the royal ontario museum. they expanded and it was designed by daniel libeskind. they kept the original entrance and the inside of the place is DAZZLING. not a fail at all.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#15

skyscrapercity Report

Add photo comments
POST
Becklass
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It’s like the lovely old building had been eaten by an ugly one.

View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#19

L'évolution du patrimoine bâti Report

Add photo comments
POST
H Edwards
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I don't mind this one, in fact I think it's an improvement. The original building isn't anything special.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu