Join the Fun!

Final score:

119points

POST

Mimi Kumar 4 years ago

Where did all the windows go

102points

Final score:

114points

POST

Mimi Kumar 4 years ago

Ah nooo, the first one was so pretty

140points

Final score:

103points

POST

idkwhatsmyname 4 years ago

UGLY COLOR PALATTE

129points

Final score:

98points

POST

Tabernus 4 years ago

This is unforgivable

168points

Final score:

95points

POST

Samantha Lomb 4 years ago

Also Russia, but this cladding just clips on so it could be removed and the oдвук building is still under there

33points

Final score:

95points

POST

Tabernus 4 years ago

Birmingham central library .... There's a reason the style is called 'brutalist'

117points

Joonscrab 4 years ago

I'm crying at how beautiful the Gothic one looks 😭😭 brutalism isn't one of my favourites for sure

20points

M.C. 4 years ago

If every piece of brutalist architecture in the world was replaced by gothic architecture I'd cry tears of joy. Brutalist architecture can die for all I care.

9points

Tabitha L 4 years ago

Yes. There is a reason that it is called brutalist. Because raw concrete is beton brut in French. Hence, brutalist.

8points

ArhomR 4 years ago

For good reason. S/b “Ugliest” architecture.

2points

Ildiko Okido 4 years ago

The only correct name for this style is “ugly”!

1point

Bobby Stahr 4 years ago

we have far too many like that in Winnipeg Manitoba Canada!!!!

1point

Michelle Rudd 4 years ago

It's gone now. The new library is spectacular, as is a lot of Birmingham city centre. It's a fantastic city

0points

IlovemydogShilo 4 years ago

It's just like the Barbican Centre in London. With it being the home of the London Symphony Orchestra, The BBC Symphony Orchestra a Library and many other things to do with the Arts, let's just say that what goes on inside is way more beautiful than how it looks on the outside.

-2points

Emyo Jennifer Nakayama 4 years ago

I hate the trend towards everything as "modern". The old styles were often exquisite examples of art and craftsmanship.

11points

Bacony Cakes 4 years ago

And now we have mouldy concrete bricks.

0points

Khadeja 4 years ago

How??? This architect has done a heinous crime against humanity.

5points

Nhaundar 4 years ago (edited)

It was soo damn beautiful... Why?!

5points

Octavia Hansen 4 years ago

City council out to lunch when this was approved by the cleaning staff?

5points

tangy chip 4 years ago

I no longer have any faith in humanity

4points

MagicalUnicorn 4 years ago

why???

3points

Tabernus 4 years ago

Partly because a lot of Birmingham was bombed in WW2 and they came up with a new plan for the city and knocked a load of the rest down

3points

Bacony Cakes 4 years ago

oh my god it's awful blitz it again no

2points

sarah llop 4 years ago

Who would do this? This tragedy is making me physically ill.

2points

kjorn 4 years ago

i hate concrete. i prefer bricks and stones

1point

Lord Mysticlaw 4 years ago

Who thought this would be a good idea?

1point

Ashley Conover 4 years ago

Horrible

1point

natie marie 4 years ago

And the architect must be so proud. Sigh

1point

Rainclouds Radio 4 years ago

I know architects who are obsessed with Brutalism. It's like a dark humour thing or something but they use words like "irony" to describe their love for it... *eye roll*

1point

Joan OConnor 4 years ago

This looks like those East Communist Bloc styles that were popular in the late 60s.

1point

Felicity Lemon 4 years ago

The tree 🌲

1point

Vickie Johnston 4 years ago

Oh wow... lived in Brum for 30 years, didn’t realise such a beautiful building stood there before! 😭

1point

Bender Bending Rodríguez 4 years ago

That looks like The Boston City Hall.

1point

H Edwards 4 years ago

This is Birmingham, in the UK. This was done in the 1970s, absolutely criminal.

4points

Mimi Kumar 4 years ago

At least the tower is cool

1point

Elaine Dodge 1 year ago

Horrific! People who do this should be thrown in jail.

0points

Jeffrey Tustin 3 years ago

Thankfully we do not have to endure this anymore. The Library has been demolished and the whole area re-developed

0points

klatula 3 years ago

sanitize the soul right out of the area

0points

Hugh Walter 3 years ago

To be fair - I think the Luftwaffe might have had a hand in later planning decisions on this one?

0points

Valerie Page 4 years ago

But to be realistic, These ornate old buildings were worn out and impossible to heat properly. Our councils can't afford to keep them up without increasing local taxes to a level which isn't acceptable to the paying population who prefer better schools, infrastructure and services. As my old Granny used to say "He who pays the piper calls the tune" And we elect our councils

0points

Debi-Nikita Rentzke 4 years ago

Why?

0points

Annette Rainbow 4 years ago

Hate this too.

0points

Onion rings like to make your breath smelly 4 years ago (edited)

why did they take that away??? it was so pretty!

0points

mermaidgirl960 4 years ago

I see they tried to keep the centerpiece but I'm mad that they completely changed all of the buildings around it. Victorian buildings are so beautiful yet hard to renovate :(

0points

Barbara Vandewalle 4 years ago

The history is being destroyed. Those building had a history

0points

OTTER 4 years ago

Is this what they mean about keeping a ‘token’ from the scene of a crime?

0points

Loraine MacGinness 4 years ago

Absolutely awful. Leave all this abominable building to the Americans. Old Character to the UK. They are destroying London too trying to be clever ??

0points

Tina Harbour 4 years ago

Ugh.

0points

Paloma Vita 4 years ago

That is not a renovation but complete destruction... brutal indeed!

0points

Carmen Honacker 4 years ago

Are you kidding me??? This is so ugly!

0points

Martha Higgins 4 years ago

Another shameful mess.

0points

Lisa Chambers 4 years ago

This is terrible.

0points

Steve Cruz 4 years ago

The "Then" photo appears to have been taken in the 1800s. Who knows what happened to the original buildings in the course of two world wars and global financial collapse. The "new" building was erected in the 1950s.

0points

Ole Peder Amrud Hagen 4 years ago

That's not a renovation. This brutalist building is pretty nice, but has unfortunately been town down itself.

0points

Kitty Fenerty 4 years ago

I could weep, this is appalling.

0points

Maureen Peters 4 years ago

A consolation?

0points

Johanne Trudeau 4 years ago

Not a fan of the brutalist style. Too stark...

0points

Ed Freshwater 4 years ago

It hasn't looked like the "Now" picture for years!

0points

Paizleypie 4 years ago

Ugh.

0points

AzKhaleesi 4 years ago

I hate people

0points

Bama Belle 4 years ago

It was beautiful before, hideous after.

0points

I'm lay sheep in China 4 years ago

1st one look like something from Fantasy world 2nd one is plain as Bread

0points

Jasmine Donald 4 years ago

I get modern, but this is too strange....

0points

Dalene Weiss 4 years ago

it looks as if the entire historic section was rebuilt. So wrong.

0points

Damsel in the Dark 4 years ago

Frigg you innovator

0points

Jenny Pugh 4 years ago

Fortunately, the bloody thing has been pulled down

0points

Ian Fitzgerald 4 years ago

this has actually been knocked down and replaced now :)

0points

Jacki Hamer 4 years ago

The pretty buildings are still there - the second pic is taken from the opposite side and the ugly library is long gone!

0points

Michelle Thornton 4 years ago

From architectural masterpiece to Legoland 👎🏻

0points

martin Phiri 4 years ago

maybe they needed more room?...idk

0points

Neva Nevičica 4 years ago

Why didn't they just build a similar/same one in the same place, if it was ruined in bombings. Dresden was rebuilt in the same style, so it is possible. The goth building would make a great library, like from Harry Potter :)

0points

ML 4 years ago

Now? It looks like from the 80's

0points

Sent From The Slytherin House 4 years ago

uck

0points

Grumble O'Pug 4 years ago

Brutalist is just so awful.

0points

Helenium 4 years ago

All that’s been demolished. You should it now if you think that’s bad.

0points

Sasha Kuleshov 4 years ago

Brutalism fail! :P

0points

Azziza 4 years ago

Looks like a prison.

0points

Tina Hugh 4 years ago

I like it

0points

Carole Deem 4 years ago

people staying way in droves

0points

Stefaan De Clerck 4 years ago

Brutal indeed.

0points

Marcia Cash 4 years ago

Ayn Rand would be proud.

0points

Mal 4 years ago

I love it

0points

Jane Doe 4 years ago

Am I the only person who oh no, before scrolling down?

0points

Wyndmere 4 years ago

No - they Didn’t. You’re gonna loose tourist if you keep this up!!

0points

Patty Stier 4 years ago

From beautiful to not!

0points

Gary Burley 4 years ago

both of these no longer exist

0points

pansexualandproud 4 years ago

WHHHYYYY!!!!!

0points

Bobby Stahr 4 years ago

a step backwards IMHO!

0points

Final score:

77points

POST

GeoSushi 4 years ago

WHY!!!

78points

Final score:

74points

POST

leafy_tree 4 years ago

wow, so spiky

58points

#10

Final score:

69points

POST

Popcorn Colonel 4 years ago

OMG! The first pic was really cute! Why would ANYONE do such a thing?

103points

#11

Final score:

62points

POST

ShawtyCantComeToThePhone 4 years ago

hey janice let's replace this beautiful building with a yellow block

92points

#12

Final score:

61points

POST

leafy_tree 4 years ago

nooo....they ruined the historical atmosphere

93points

#13

Final score:

50points

POST

ShawtyCantComeToThePhone 4 years ago

What the heck am i looking at

27points

#14

Final score:

46points

POST

Bobby Stahr 4 years ago

Sigh

51points

#15

Final score:

43points

POST

Becklass 4 years ago

It’s like the lovely old building had been eaten by an ugly one.

53points

#16

Final score:

39points

POST

Monika Rhodes 4 years ago

Idk, I kind of like the NOW better.

58points

Dutch Swimmer Goes Viral For Super Revealing Trunks During 2024 Olympics: “Is This Legal?”

See Also on Bored Panda

Thrill-Seeking Diver Jumps Down Extreme Waterslide, Ignoring The Strict Ban For Women

#17

Final score:

38points

POST

Mimi Kumar 4 years ago

The roof of the right building is completely lopsided

16points

#18

Final score:

34points

POST

H Edwards 4 years ago

I like this, doesn't detract from the other houses.

104points

#19

Final score:

30points

POST

H Edwards 4 years ago

I don't mind this one, in fact I think it's an improvement. The original building isn't anything special.

218points

#20

Final score:

30points

POST

ArhomR 4 years ago

Prison block.

47points

#21

Final score:

27points

POST

Raine Soo 4 years ago

X marks the spot. This is Monteal.

26points

#22

Final score:

26points

POST

H Edwards 4 years ago

Nobody would tear down an original Tudor building these days, thankfully.

42points

Neringa is a proud writer at Bored Panda who used to study English and French linguistics. Although she has many different interests, she's particularly drawn to covering stories about pop culture as well as history. While not at the office, this Panda enjoys creepy movies, poetry, photography and learning how to play the piano.

Read less »

What do you think ?

POST

Tabernus 4 years ago

This is a pretty lazy list - many of the original buildings were either bombed or cleared after WW2. In many instances the replacement buildings were put up quickly and cheaply, or were genuinely believed to be cutting edge in the '60's

76points

Kendra Miller 4 years ago

Thank you for clarifying that. Usually in architecture you can see bones and remnants left from the original, but many of these were clearly different.

22points

Monika Soffronow 4 years ago

I so much agree with you because nope, I do not like mindless posts. This one is made for easy outrage and condemnation - without having a single fact presented about the buildings. Where is the building? Is is structurally sound? Is it possible to renovate it? What has it been converted into, i.e. what is it used for? Private or public ownership? North western Europe is littered with disused churches and I cannot see why a much more secular modern society should have to keep every church as it once was. That money is much better spent on health and education, if you ask me.

9points

RaroaRaroa 4 years ago

Yes, someone doesn't know the meaning of 'renovation'. Most of these are replacements.

1point

cybermerlin2000 4 years ago

In the case of the Tamworth ones, it was just pure commercial expansion. A lot of the shops and pubs are still the original Tudor buildings with and are listed buildings now and can't be altered any further

0points

Ivan Wahl 4 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Kel Gal 4 years ago

I imagine that so many of the before buildings were in such bad condition that it was less expensive and safer to tear them down.

39points

Jutta Plötz 10 months ago

Most of them were destroyed during the war

0points

Harley Hoglin 4 years ago

Every photo that shows a building destroyed in WW2 and what replaced it needs to be removed. Comparing what became a bombed out pile of rubble to a new building is bullshit.

37points

Ivan Wahl 4 years ago

If we were misled on even one of the photos it negates the entire premise of the post. Replaced is not renovated and if a major portion of the original building was destroyed and replaced with something else entirely that does not qualify as a renovation either.

15points

Jerry Juneau 3 years ago

Not all of those were not WWII bombed buildings. Besides, in the Atomic age 1950’s-1960’s, many of the 1800-1900’s buildings were razed for modern buildings. We are now seeing things like that happen again where our mid century buildings are outdated, un functional and in many ways, unsafe. It is the natural cycle. Not all buildings are relevant or practical enough to be saved.

0points

GDOY 4 years ago

Not really, I recognize a few from Montreal

0points

Russell Ellwardt 4 years ago

Many of these are not renovations but replacements. This "list" is no list. Totally useless.

11points

Paulina 4 years ago

The title of this post is so misleading 😠 Those are NOT renovations! Most of the pictures show what was in that spot decades ago and then what's there now. Given most of those are from Europe it's safe to say that "before" buildings no longer exist because of the bombings in WW2 or were torn down not much later due to damages.

8points

mph seti 4 years ago

A lot of the time, this is done because there's really no other choice. An old building is falling apart and otherwise unsafe/unusable as is. We don't t know the full stories, here. That said, turning something charming and comfortable into something Brutalist or Minimalist isn't usually a good idea. Especially when it's a result of gentrification driving out people in favor of new, wealthier, people.

4points

Petra Schaap 4 years ago

i kinda like Brutalism... its so ugly and weird that its fascinating... its a part of history now, but I dont understand they thought it was a good idea back then.

1point

Olivia Agave 4 years ago

Most of these were either damaged or destroyed in WW2, or the original structure was unstable after being abandoned for years. Now, if you want something gross that doesn't come under these conditions - Maidstone Museum, listed old mansion house that they cut a hole in and slapped a burning gold and glass structure on the side of. maidstone-...f1baca.jpg

4points

StardustRainO8 4 years ago

I don't know any historcial facts or storys behind these bulidings, but people shuld take a look back and appericate the buliding thats aleready there.

3points

CamlikesCookies 4 years ago

Reverse renovations of bad sims 4 builds.

2points

WilvanderHeijden 4 years ago

A lot of the old buildings got bombed so that's a valid reason to replace them with was considered modern architecture. Sadly even today beautiful buildings get destroyed because a council wants to "step into the future" by building ghastly concrete towers. That's why a lot of cities are so terrible depressing. Grey pavement, grey buildings, black tarmac.

2points

Jungkook Hbdhgs 4 years ago

Sad. After look like The sims 4 buildings

1point

Jungkook Hbdhgs 4 years ago

Need Memories and museum.

1point

Jungkook Hbdhgs 4 years ago (edited)

Sad. Before old building look beautiful and interesting. Lazy after new build. I hate new build like modern buildings. I like vintage and cozy old things.

1point

Shelp 4 years ago

There's a real discrepancy between what architects are taught to find ''beautiful'', and what the people actually like

1point

fainasKeturatis 4 years ago

"renovation" is not building from the foundation on the remains of last building but renewing or "making something look new again". Half of those are not "renovations".

1point

no_name 4 years ago

Let me just point out that not every building survives hundreds of years intact and very often they need to be demolished, and sometimes it happens that during wars buidings (and not just buildings) are destroyed. In those cases, noone creates an exact replica of something once built, but tries to come up with new modern ideas, not necessarily better of prettier, but that's the way it is.

1point

mande.be 4 years ago

List is badly assembled. Because, many of the "older" buildings on the photos were BOMBED OR TEARED DOWN IN WAR! Do not forget that many countries in Europe had to rebuild themselves in a fastest possible time, so many of them are not really well perceived at the time.

1point

lara 4 years ago

In Russia this type of architecture is called "Stalinist." The horrific monster buildings he had built in Moscow are called "The Seven Ugly Sisters".

1point

Petra Schaap 4 years ago

are they considered ugly? I love them! O_O

1point

person (i think) 4 years ago

Dumb list. Most of these are re-builds, not "renovations". Two totally different things.

1point

Tabitha L 4 years ago

A list like this is incomplete without NYC Penn Station before and after. Watch this and have your heart broken - https://youtu.be/_vby82-Z60s

1point

El muerto 4 years ago

many of these are down to destruction during war...but too many horrible examples of bad taste

1point

H Edwards 4 years ago

The Birmingham city centre one was done in the 1970s. From the 1950s to the 1980s there was a lot of this in the UK.

2points

Petra Schaap 4 years ago

@Charlotte: Im so fascinated with what they did in the centre of Stockholm/Sveavägen in the name of city renewing. The Swedes were (among) the first I think. But the glass fountain in Sergelstorget is beautifull.

1point

alexpcorn 4 years ago

El muerto -

0points

Eliyahu Rooff 4 years ago

It's also worth remembering that many old buildings have deteriorated to the point where restoration is prohibitively expensive, even if the original was beautiful. They often don't meet modern safety standards, and would require that builders tear them down to bare bones to retrofit them so they are energy efficient and safe.

0points

Steve Cruz 4 years ago

Photos a century old don't show what state the property was in when it was renovated or replaced. The Regency-era (early 1800s) buildings where the Birmingham City Library (built in the 1950s) had been bombed.

0points

Kitty Fenerty 4 years ago

I wish I hadn’t looked at these pictures. Utterly depressing.

0points

pebs 4 years ago

The title is incorrect: most of these buildings were destroyed by the war and replaced by new buildings, they weren't "renovated".

0points

Dave 4 years ago

These buildings were not renovated, most were torn down and a new building was built!

0points

Elica 4 years ago

Going through the post I was like "what??!" in minion accent for every single one of them...

0points

Jocelyn 4 years ago

i would hardly call most of these "renovations"

0points

Łukasz Markuszewski 4 years ago

As Tabernus said - the WW2 is responsible for most of this devastations. We must also remember, that a lot of old buildings, especially housing, was not very nice to live in - lack of toilets, dark patios, narrow backstreets, lack of elevators - many of them looked nice but during '50 and '60 they were considered unlivable and obscure. This is why they were demolished and replaced with modernist blocks, even though some of the demolishings were controversial back then. In Poland we have a lot of very modern demolishings (the reason is corrupted governments allowing developers to destroy original urban structure), one of the most known is "renovation" of 14th century Dzialdowo Castle. They put styrofoam on it and then colours. Luckily it was stopped and reversed by the old monuments protection institution. See below: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/DR3tIdFbbUWaxCEasghRxhjHn1kgQXRn654uPjS1ogq2k79wbT9TyPuCJ9Vw6pXt5TIxY4_pjTyvr-SSsw

0points

El Dee 4 years ago

Horrific! Slabs of concrete and/or glass that look awful from the outside and are awful to work in too. Made worse by the fact that the previous buildings WERE aesthetically pleasing..

0points

marianne eliza 4 years ago

Now now. I'm sure if the author actually knew what renovation means, they would have chosen differently. But it is so hard to learn new vocabulary.

0points

Data1001 4 years ago

In addition to the point several other comments made, I think a lot of these were gradual changes, as well. It wasn't like overnight they went from a beautiful gothic building to some ugly modern cookie-cutter design. Not to mention that at the time when many of them were built, that style was very common, and probably wasn't thought of as anything outrageously special, so when updates needed to be made, little thought was given to keeping the style of the previous build, which was probably thought to be outdated at the time of the renovation.

0points

David Donaldson 4 years ago

For a contributor that studied English linguistics their understanding of the word "Renovated" leave a lot to be desired.

0points

Perfumista Perfumista 4 years ago

Pre 1964 and current Penn Station in NY should be on here.

0points

Monika Soffronow 4 years ago

This comment has been deleted.

0points

marlene 4 years ago

this was painful to look at

0points

spoklo 4 years ago

marlene like

0points

Rob Chapman 4 years ago

Sometimes this happens in reverse. The Chronicle Building in San Francisco (built in the 1890's), was damaged in the 1906 earthquake & rebuilt by 1915 (very close to it's 1890's appearance). It was modernized in 1962 with an aluminum & glass exterior, and then restored back to it's 1915 appearance in 2014.

0points

Tahani 4 years ago

Sigh

0points

Sandij D 4 years ago

This happens all over especially as real estate/rental costs increase. It is mostly not due to war damage or the inability to renovate. Often the facades of the 'new' buildings are put on top of, next to and over the old building in order to increase the space and, therefore, the $$$ made off each site. Several that I am very familiar with were supposed to be heritage sites - before someone with money and connections came in and snatched the property up.

0points

Julie Johnson 4 years ago

Some people wouldn’t recognise beautiful architecture if it fell on them or the skill and craftsmanship it took to create it.

0points

Lærke Littlebird 4 years ago

It's not renovating if you replace old with new. Renovating means keeping at least some part of the old.

0points

FurryManiac 4 years ago

These make me sad...

0points

ISpiltLipstickInYourValentinoBag 4 years ago

I loved the old buildings! Idk why anyone would want to get rid of them but it would probably be because to make more stuff :(

0points

Leigh Hogan 4 years ago

Most of the time they are in disrepair to the point of dangerous.

2points

Dorothy Cloud 3 years ago

I just quit looking. The new designs were just so unattractive, ugly and truthfully just plain disrespectful!

-1point

Naomi Armitage 4 years ago

Unanimously, ALL the Thens are far superior to the Nows. So sad to lose all that historic beauty.

-3points

Popcorn Colonel 4 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Petra Schaap 4 years ago

or maybe a bomb distroyed the building in the war...

0points

Octavia Hansen 4 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

gaconlongvang2011 4 years ago

Octavia Hansen good

0points

POST

Tabernus 4 years ago

76points

Kendra Miller 4 years ago

Thank you for clarifying that. Usually in architecture you can see bones and remnants left from the original, but many of these were clearly different.

22points

Monika Soffronow 4 years ago

9points

RaroaRaroa 4 years ago

Yes, someone doesn't know the meaning of 'renovation'. Most of these are replacements.

1point

cybermerlin2000 4 years ago

0points

Ivan Wahl 4 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Kel Gal 4 years ago

I imagine that so many of the before buildings were in such bad condition that it was less expensive and safer to tear them down.

39points

Jutta Plötz 10 months ago

Most of them were destroyed during the war

0points

Harley Hoglin 4 years ago

Every photo that shows a building destroyed in WW2 and what replaced it needs to be removed. Comparing what became a bombed out pile of rubble to a new building is bullshit.

37points

Ivan Wahl 4 years ago

15points

Jerry Juneau 3 years ago

0points

GDOY 4 years ago

Not really, I recognize a few from Montreal

0points

Russell Ellwardt 4 years ago

Many of these are not renovations but replacements. This "list" is no list. Totally useless.

11points

Paulina 4 years ago

8points

mph seti 4 years ago

4points

Petra Schaap 4 years ago

i kinda like Brutalism... its so ugly and weird that its fascinating... its a part of history now, but I dont understand they thought it was a good idea back then.

1point

Olivia Agave 4 years ago

4points

StardustRainO8 4 years ago

I don't know any historcial facts or storys behind these bulidings, but people shuld take a look back and appericate the buliding thats aleready there.

3points

CamlikesCookies 4 years ago

Reverse renovations of bad sims 4 builds.

2points

WilvanderHeijden 4 years ago

2points

Jungkook Hbdhgs 4 years ago

Sad. After look like The sims 4 buildings

1point

Jungkook Hbdhgs 4 years ago

Need Memories and museum.

1point

Jungkook Hbdhgs 4 years ago (edited)

Sad. Before old building look beautiful and interesting. Lazy after new build. I hate new build like modern buildings. I like vintage and cozy old things.

1point

Shelp 4 years ago

There's a real discrepancy between what architects are taught to find ''beautiful'', and what the people actually like

1point

fainasKeturatis 4 years ago

"renovation" is not building from the foundation on the remains of last building but renewing or "making something look new again". Half of those are not "renovations".

1point

no_name 4 years ago

1point

mande.be 4 years ago

1point

lara 4 years ago

In Russia this type of architecture is called "Stalinist." The horrific monster buildings he had built in Moscow are called "The Seven Ugly Sisters".

1point

Petra Schaap 4 years ago

are they considered ugly? I love them! O_O

1point

person (i think) 4 years ago

Dumb list. Most of these are re-builds, not "renovations". Two totally different things.

1point

Tabitha L 4 years ago

A list like this is incomplete without NYC Penn Station before and after. Watch this and have your heart broken - https://youtu.be/_vby82-Z60s

1point

El muerto 4 years ago

many of these are down to destruction during war...but too many horrible examples of bad taste

1point

H Edwards 4 years ago

The Birmingham city centre one was done in the 1970s. From the 1950s to the 1980s there was a lot of this in the UK.

2points