Like Bridgerton, this 1800s historical film didn’t quite get the corsets accurate.

According to the time period of Pride & Prejudice, corsets were either structured with cups or stopped just below the bust — and neither was seen in the movie.

Kiera Knightley’s character also decided to attend a ball without her gloves, an accessory that was considered essential when attending these kinds of events. But perhaps this decision was intentional, to show Lizzie’s rebellious spirit.

As the main female character Helen of Troy walked up a set of stairs in the movie, it may be symbolic for some people to find her carrying a gorgeous pink umbrella as a way of shielding the blinding sun, considering she was regarded as the most beautiful woman in the world. 

The only problem? The late Bronze Age, which is when the film takes place, certainly did not have umbrellas that looked like that. 

Umbrellas were invented over 4,000 years ago and, starting in China before making their way to Greece and Rome from Egypt, but modern umbrellas didn’t make their way into society until around the late 1800s.

Ruffs — a frilly or wide item of clothing that went around the necks of men and women — were quite common in the mid 16th and 17th century in Europe and were attached to tops, dresses, etc. in order to keep their garments clean.

In The Tudors, however, they’re seen more as modern necklaces where the ruffs appear to be separated from other articles of clothing.

The ladies of Bridgerton have made many viewers jealous with their gorgeous gowns, stylized hair, and tight-fitting corsets. But, as the saying goes, beauty is pain — something even the women in the Regency era of England recognized.

Back then, women wore shirts to protect their skin from corsets, both as a way to extend the life of the garment and avoid unnecessary discomfort. In the Netflix series, however, the actresses all wore their corsets directly against their skin.

Perhaps due to aesthetics?

While certainly attention-grabbing, Kathy Selden’s gorgeous sleeveless pink dress did not match the 1920s decade the film was supposed to be set in.

Instead, it more accurately represented the 1950s, which makes sense since the movie was filmed in 1951. At the time, tight bodices and full skirts were all the craze.

It’s no surprise that safety is obviously a priority while filming on-set, but in the case of Seabiscuit, that became a historically inaccurate mistake that some history buffs may have figured out.

Tobey Maguire, who played Red Pollard, wore a red helmet as he rode atop his horse. But the chin strap that the actor donned had actually not yet existed during the 1930s and The Great Depression, which is the time period the film is set in.

The 2019 adaptation of Louisa May Alcott’s novel is set in 1860s England, but the hairstyles of Florence Pugh’s and Emma Watson’s characters don’t exactly go with the time period.

Back then, bangs were cut much shorter with curly strands instead of the modern look Amy and Meg March sported throughout the film. It was also much more common for women to have their hair pulled back and out of their face, unlike the loose styles seen in the movie.

Jamie Foxx sure looked cool rocking his shades, and it definitely fits the vibe of 1858 Texas — except, of course, for the fact that modern-day sunglasses didn’t appear until 1929.