Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
then open in external browser
and click "Open in External Browser" 
Ever since I was a child, I have been fascinated by historical facts and archaeology. I think humans perceive the past as a series of events; something like a movie that we can’t really feel or touch. I believe the things that bring us closer to the past are those that truly humanize us - the bodies from Pompeii, the perfectly preserved Inca mummies, the personal objects of long-gone historical figures, and more.
I’ve always thought how incredible it would be to see historical events and the famous people the way they actually happened and the way they actually looked. I started Royalty Now in February of 2019, simply as a way for me to see my favorite historical figure, Anne Boleyn, as a woman of modern times. I wanted to know if she could come to life from the few pale, flat portraits we have of her. I started the account to satisfy my own curiosity about what those interesting people of the past would look like if they were standing right in front of me. I’m incredibly thankful for the support and interest the account has received, and can’t wait to see what happens next with other historical people.
More info: Instagram
This post may include affiliate links.
#1
Nefertiti
"This bust of Nefertiti (believed to have been sculpted during her lifetime) is famous for its grace and beauty. Nefertiti lived from approximately 1370 - 1330 BC. She was an Egyptian queen and the wife of Akhenaten, an Egyptian Pharaoh. Akhenaten is famous for his attempt to transition Egypt into a monotheistic society (worshipping only the sun god, Aten), instead of a polytheistic one."
Final score:
262points
RELATED:
#2
Julius Ceasar
Final score:
212points
Edwin Quantrall 5 years ago
"Friends! Romans! Countrymen! Lend me L million gold pieces that I may invent something better than these tabula!"
Load More Replies...
Stannous Flouride 5 years ago
His hair should be much thinner, Julius was secretly mocked by his contemporaries for his forward comb-over. (sure glad we live in a modern world where our world leaders aren't so shallow and vain)
Don Lee 5 years ago
You don't think Julius would join Hair Club for Emperors?
Load More Replies...
Walter Snyder 5 years ago
Reminds me of Sasha Roiz who played, among others, Sean Renard on NBC's Grimm. sasha-roiz...e702fe.jpg 
Bad Asterisk 5 years ago (edited)
Wow, looks like Tobias Menzies! Haha; I googled Tobias Menzies' picture and this was actually made on his image!
Zane Thompson 4 years ago
And the irony that he is played Brutus in “Rome” and sunk the final knife to finish Caesar off
Load More Replies...
Victorya Shidlovskaya 5 years ago
somehow they all look worse than statues - less character, strength.. Maybe shadows are not strong enough, so drawn faces loose their muscle tension
Tony De Franco 4 years ago
Hair is different . Caesar's hair is curly ,, and Caesar would probably be more tan complected . Even in those days Italians were darker than that I believe
Bobbi Gardner 4 years ago
I don't mean he looks like me. I just commented in the wrong place. This is meant for madam Pompafour below!!! Lol!
Steve Berry 4 years ago
That statute is not one of the generally accepted likenesses of Julius Caesar. His forehead would have been larger, his hair thinner on top and his hair would have been blond. Even so, Caesar was a tough customer and the drawing reflects that. But, the likened does not reflect his charm (he won election after, never losing a single one, and he was an accomplished seducer of women) or his intelligence (he wrote an accomplished memoir of his conquest of Gaul, now France, that students still read and spoke both LTin and Greek fluently.
Sandra Wolf 4 years ago
Am I the only one seeing Christopher Eccleston as the 10th Doctor Who...? 🤨
Louise Stange-Wahl 5 years ago
Looks like Ash from Alien (Lance Henriksen"s) brother! Ash-5e4ced...ec27c2.jpg 
Alfredo Pena 5 years ago
It amazes me me that you would put his skin so white? It's now known the colors were some of the first things to fade do to time. Most definatly looked more middle eastern. JS
Adrien Nash 5 years ago
He would look about 75% different if he had ice blue eyes, had blond hair, and his left ear was where it is on the sculpture. Otherwise, an amazing adaptation. Can one make a request to see the described version # 2?
Philip Lecompte 5 years ago
He looks somewhat mentally imbalanced which I would assume he was, all things considered ...
Jerry Stander 5 years ago
IN THE LIVES OF THE TWELVE CAESARS BY THE ROMAN BIOGRAPHER SUETONIUS, THE THEN GENERAL GAIUS JULIUS IS DESCRIBED AS BEING BALD WHEN HE SLIPS ON THE BEACH UPON LANDING ON AFRICA (A BAD OMEN), BUT RISES QUICKLY WITH A FIFTFUL OF SAND PROCLAIMING "AFRICA, NOW I HAVE YOU!"
Super Hero Fan Girl 5 years ago
Looks like someone touched his face while the paint was still wet.
Helen Chappell 5 years ago
Julius is very disappointed in you and it's going on your permanent record.
#3
Queen Elizabeth I
Final score:
186points
#4
Alexander The Great
"I did some research on his looks and it is recorded that he had curly golden hair and heterochromia (one eye blue and one eye brown or a combo of both), so he was definitely a striking figure."
Final score:
180points
#5
Agrippina The Younger
"Agrippina the Younger is someone I only recently learned more about but she had a crazy life. She was the sister of Emperor Caligula and the mother of Emperor Nero. I highly recommend giving her a search if you’re interested in that era of Roman history!"
Final score:
149points
#6
Jane Austen
Final score:
149points
#8
Mary, Queen Of Scots
Final score:
142points
Lauren Moss 5 years ago
Love that you can see the resemblence between Mary and her cousin Elizabeth I!
#9
Madame De Pompadour
"Jeanne Antoinette Poisson, better known as Madame de Pompadour. She first caught the eye of Louis XV at a masked ball in 1745 (it was said that she was dressed as a domino, and he was dressed as a plant) and was his chief mistress thereafter until 1751. Even after she was no longer Louis' mistress, she was a trusted friend, confidante, and advisor, essentially becoming one of the most powerful women at the French court until her death in 1764."
Final score:
142points
#10
Empress Elisabeth Of Austria
"During her life, Elisabeth (known as Sisi), was known for being beautiful, smart, rebellious and passionate. Definitely worth some digging into if you are interested in late 1800s Europe."
Final score:
128points
#11
Louis XIV, The Sun King
Final score:
122points
#12
Katherine Of Aragon
"This portrait of Katherine of Aragon, wife of King Henry VIII and Queen of England from 1509-1533, has always been my favorite. There are several portraits of her that all range in looks, so it’s hard to tell her true likeness. I think this one captures her piety, meekness, and obedience as documented by historians."
Final score:
121points
#13
Louis XV
"Louis XV is lesser known than his predecessor the Sun King and his heir, Louis XVI, but he was the second-longest reigning monarch in French history. I have always known him by his famous mistresses, Madame De Pompadour and Madame du Barry."
Final score:
112points
#14
Catherine Parr
"She was the only wife to outlive the king, who was tyrannical in his last years."
Final score:
111points
Viviane 5 years ago
Anne of Cleves outlived him as well. She got the best deal: Henry VIII annulled the marriage within a year, gave her some nice properties, a title, and honorary membership to the family as "the King's Beloved Sister" (invitations to court without the hassle of being married to someone toxic).
#15
Marie Antionette
Final score:
103points
#16
The Grand Duchess Anastasia Romanov
Final score:
99points
#17
Queen Isabella Of Castile
"Queen Isabella of Castile, partner to Ferdinand II of Aragon and the queen who sent Columbus on his way to the “new world” in 1492. "
Final score:
97points
#18
Emperor Augustus
"Emperor Augustus (born Octavius, the great-nephew of Julius Caesar) was the first emperor of Rome, ending 500 years of republic. He’s an incredibly controversial figure, especially due to the smart and ruthless way he came to power, but he ruled over a time of relative peace in the Roman empire."
Final score:
96points
#19
Abraham Lincoln
"Abe Lincoln was the 16th president of the United States from March 1861 until his assassination in April 1865. Lincoln led the nation through the American Civil War, its bloodiest war and its greatest moral, constitutional, and political crisis. He preserved the Union, abolished slavery, strengthened the federal government, and modernized the U.S. economy."
Final score:
92points
#20
Christina Of Denmark
"Christina of Denmark, seen here in an original Hans Holbein portrait, lived from 1521 - 1590. Christina was considered as a possible bride for King Henry VIII of England. Christina was not fond of the English King's reputation, given that he had divorced his first wife and beheaded his second wife. The originator of one of the greatest quotes about King Henry in history, Christina famously said: "If I had two heads, one should be at the King of England's disposal." What an amazing denial to a marriage proposal."
Final score:
90points
#21
Katherine Howard
"Katherine Howard (c. 1523 – 13 February 1542) was Queen of England for only 16 months as the fifth wife of Henry VIII. Katherine was actually the cousin of Henry's second wife, Anne Boleyn. When they married, he was 49 and she only 16 or 17. Katherine was accused of adultery and executed by the King, ending her short reign as the Queen of England."
Final score:
82points
#22
Eleanor Of Toledo
"Eleanor of Toledo was an astonishing woman. Originally from Toledo, Spain, she was a bride to a famous member of the Medici Family, Cosimo I de Medici. Her husband regularly consulted with her on matters of politics, and she even served as consort during his time away from Florence."
Final score:
81points
#23
Madame Du Barry
"This is Madame du Barry - the official mistress of Louis XV after his first love, Madame de Pompadour’s death."
Final score:
80points
#24
Caligula
"Caligula, infamous brat and Roman Emperor."
Final score:
78points
Christoph Lindemann 5 years ago
You could have just postet a picture of Jack Gleeson (Joffrey Baratheon in Game of Thrones). They look pretty much alike.
#25
Napoleon
"Did you know that Napoleon was most likely 5'7"? That's taller than King Louis XIV. Some say his perceived smaller stature was due to him looking small in comparison to his huge accomplishments. Others say there was an error when translating his true height from French to English. Who do you think he looks like here?"
Final score:
78points
#26
Benjamin Franklin
Final score:
71points
#28
King Henry VII
"Here we are with Henry VII, the first tudor monarch, a frequent request from you all. Henry was the last king of England to attain the throne in battle after defeating Richard III at the Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485."
Final score:
63points
Sunny Hernandez 5 years ago
Thank God for Princess Di and Kate Middleton. Inbreeding leads to so much ugliness. 😁
#29
Mona Lisa
Final score:
57points
Patrick O'Brien 5 years ago
Close, but if I met the likeness, I'm not sure the first thing I would think of is Mona Lisa. The shape of the face is not quite right and her expression lacks the subtlety of the original.
Add New Image
What do you think ?
Giovanni 5 years ago
I don't what to sound like an a*s but somebody is using this site to practice their photoshop skills and they are not doing a great job.
Scratch 5 years ago
You don't sound like an a*s. These are simply terrible.
Load More Replies...
troufaki13 5 years ago (edited)
It kinda looks like that face-swapping app and it's very badly executed ☹️
Niffler_13 5 years ago
Unfortunately most of these would not be accurate. Most sculptures and paintings drastically altered how the individuals looked, in most cases to make them look better, because they had abnormalities due to incest, scars, etc or they weren't very attractive. Unless you took the bones of the individual and recreated their facial structure, that is the only way to really know, and even that isn't totally accurate.
Jillian Lloyd 5 years ago
Exactly. And there’s been no allowance made for the many “improvements” the artists imposed on their portraits which were simply “fashionable” at the time - like all the tiny rose-bud mouths, overly long noses and too-large eyes. Many of the facial proportions are stuffed up. Just popping a modern wig on an old portrait of dodgy veracity is plainly ridiculous. I was hoping to see some accurate forensic reconstructions based on the skulls or even death masks of the subjects.
Load More Replies...
Mama Panda 5 years ago
Overall I am not pleased with these. The artist took liberties that she shouldn't have done. Giving them a slimmer face, slimmer neckline and elongating their faces makes them look cartoonish in quite a few of the recreations. To bring them more "up-to-date", changing their clothing and hairstyles should have been the only changes made to each of them.
ShireenAin'tWoke 5 years ago
I didn't want to be negative which is why my original comment was "..." but most people have said what I was going to say anyway.
Bláthnaid O’Loughlin 5 years ago
These looked like real people in the paintings, but the edited versions are seriously uncanny valley.
Sarah Conley 5 years ago
I agree. The angle of the painting/sculpture faces don't always match the photo they're put into, either.
Load More Replies...
Devorah Firestone 5 years ago
A lot of the face shapes changed a lot, and there was too much straightening of the hair, a lot of which would have still been pretty tight after even modern straightening.
Karen Klinck 5 years ago
Although tight ringlets was the fashion of the time. Many had straight hair naturally.
Load More Replies...
Animal Souls 5 years ago
I'm getting that women should not have curly hair vibe from this collection...
A Water Bottle 5 years ago
Don’t take this offensive but these don’t look very realistic, photoshop skills need to be a little more practiced. Pretty much what Giovanni said.
Mia 5 years ago
Most of these all just look like you slapped the painting/sculpture's face onto a random person. I don't want to be rude but I think this could've been done way better. I would've liked to look at one of these and think: 'Hey, that looks real, like I could actually see them looking like that.' sadly that's not the case.
Guy Fawkes 5 years ago
Pretty neat! Hope to see what Jesus, Emperor Qin or Genghis Khan might look like today.
Jim Ellington 5 years ago
I was crestfallen when I dropped my toothpaste.
Load More Replies...
Catherine Elizabeth 5 years ago
Am I the only one who tried to figure out who the faces were photoshopped on to? 😂😂😂
Carol Emory 5 years ago
It would have been better not to use live body shots with drawn faces. It just looks so weird and artificial. I stopped looking after the first dozen.
Anabel Loera 4 years ago
I believe this was a great job, regardless of the images being accurate or not, photoshop practice or not... It was just simply interesting to see how these characters from history would look like if they had been our contemporaries, I would actually love to see more like this...
Pamela Griffin 5 years ago
Nefertiti could not have been Black sub-Sahara African. There was not a Black African population in Egypt. She might have come from the areas known today as Iran, Turkey, etc., but not sub-Sahara Africa. https://www.yahoo.com/news/whos-mummy-genetic-secrets-ancient-egypt-unwrapped-192854972.html
Karen Klinck 5 years ago
Unless there was Kush in the gene pool. There were black Pharoahs...
Load More Replies...
s nedunuri 5 years ago
Nice, too bad they're all European or European origin. Why not some reconstructions of Buddha, Shah Jehan (contemporary of queeen Elizabeth, built the Taj Mahal) or Omar Khayyam?
Karen Klinck 5 years ago
Do we have verified portraits of them? I think that was the deciding factor...
Load More Replies...
Carole Mclean-Smith 5 years ago
Brilliant -but mostly the faces have been narrowed and elongated, loved them though.
John Chovan 5 years ago
It's fun. Who cares if it's accurate? I would think that today, many men would be sporting mustaches, stubble, goatees, or beards, though.
Barbara Colautti 2 years ago
That portrait is no more Katherine Parr than I am. The portrait is another of Elizabeth 1st.
Sofia Micciche 2 years ago
Alright, yes, the photoshopping isin't "on point" and everything. But this person still tried, please try and cool this hate. I would like to see all of us do better. 😭
Lynn Delano 4 years ago
I think it’s clever. I didn’t expect historical accuracy; you’d need a skull for that and an expensive scientific process. But as the author wrote of Catherine of Aragon, there are many depictions of these historical figures. It’s clever and interesting to take a portrait and put it in a modern context. It really changes the appearance, even though you can match up the face to the old portrait, feature to feature.
Marek Židův 4 years ago
nice to see that someone´s interested in history and archaeology, but let me tell you, that history is definitely not perceived as a series of events by historians, neither as a character´s story arcs.. Well done though
Nell Blackwoodson 5 years ago
I love these and this overall concept. My only real gripe is that all of the women have long, flowing hair, whereas many if not most modern women in our culturehave short hair of some kind. (As some-one who personally has long flowing hair, it gets commented on a lot be-cause many people just don't see that so often these days ) I'd love to see more modern haircuts on some of these historical women.
Thomas Kaxe 5 years ago
So.. Putting painted faces on real peoples bodies using photoshop, counts as headline news these days? Well, do I have some news for you then! I got loads of news!
Thomas Kaxe 5 years ago
So putting a drawings face on a real persons body, using photoshop, is frontpage news these days? Well, do I have some news for you then!
Pamela Valemont 5 years ago
I actually enjoyed flicking through them. Sometimes I thought they could have got it better, but mostly it is a fascinating insight. Thank you.
NIGERUNDAYOOOO 5 years ago
im sorry but my weeb a*s gotta do this. CAESAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR!!!!
Elisa Gillies 5 years ago
Fine arts, that's something good to spend time with historical facts. Thankyou for the read.
Hollie Ramsey 5 years ago
Nefertiti and Caesar were great.. and then it kind of went downhill from there.
Annette Segal 5 years ago
Some of these are very poor...while most are passable. Nothing exceptional to view.
Viv Hart 5 years ago
These can't be taken at face value - in Greek & Roman days, sculptures were all very similar, later on, the same happened with painting, there was a style for each era, especially in the 1400's & 1500's. Only much later a more naturalistic style developed. Most of Holbein's models looked similar, also Rembrandt, Vermeer, etc.
Andrew Johnson 5 years ago
Incorrect. Both Julius Caesar and Caligula were well known for their blond hair. Dark hair was extremely rare in the Italian Pennisula before the Moorish occupation.
K Lane 5 years ago
These pics are either of people that few of us have heard of, or just shoved today's clothes on an old painting. Pointless
anotherboredpanda 5 years ago
If you didn't know at least 70% of them, you've got some serious catching up to do
Load More Replies...
Sunny Hernandez 5 years ago
Lighten up, geez! It was fun. Photoshop is here to stay, hate it or not. 🙄
Giovanni 5 years ago
We like photoshop but they don't know how to use it.
Load More Replies...
Colleen Coughlin 5 years ago
Paintings NEVER truly looked like the actual individual...so unfortunately... someone's time was greatly wasted on Photoshop
blazeaglory 3 years ago
Jeesh it's annoying reading comment sections any more. Everyone acts like they have every answer to every question NEVER asked. Guess what? NO ONE CARES WHAT YOU THINK . Not to mention the majority of comments in most comment sections are usually negative in regards to perceived errors and what "should have" been done. If people would just pull their heads out of their own a$$e$ and actually learn something or count to 10 and try to understand what you're reading before making assumptions in the form of directive opinions passed of as psuedo factual. YES YOU!
Bobbi Gardner 4 years ago
Look why don't all of you who don't like these try to do them yourself and publish them here. I would love to see the results!!
John Hanson 5 years ago
Most of the royals pictured all looked a little downsy on the eyes. I guess that can be expected when ya have uncle/brothers and such. Spent to much time in the shallow end of the gene pool. If it werent for the occasional butler or servant knocking up one of them the gene pool would have dried up into some real hills have eyes kind of sh@t.
Miranda Faulkner 5 years ago
I mean would have been nice to see some people of color.... 😩 diversity made up our past and all we get is whitewashed garbage?
Karen Klinck 5 years ago
There was no diversity in Medieval Europe. This batch is all from then (except for Grace Kelly.)
Load More Replies...
Becky Moore 5 years ago
Nearly all the men (and some of the women) have got large noses. Maybe we'd have more too if it weren't for plastic surgery?
Giovanni 5 years ago
I don't what to sound like an a*s but somebody is using this site to practice their photoshop skills and they are not doing a great job.
Scratch 5 years ago
You don't sound like an a*s. These are simply terrible.
Load More Replies... troufaki13 5 years ago (edited)
It kinda looks like that face-swapping app and it's very badly executed ☹️
Niffler_13 5 years ago
Unfortunately most of these would not be accurate. Most sculptures and paintings drastically altered how the individuals looked, in most cases to make them look better, because they had abnormalities due to incest, scars, etc or they weren't very attractive. Unless you took the bones of the individual and recreated their facial structure, that is the only way to really know, and even that isn't totally accurate.
Jillian Lloyd 5 years ago
Exactly. And there’s been no allowance made for the many “improvements” the artists imposed on their portraits which were simply “fashionable” at the time - like all the tiny rose-bud mouths, overly long noses and too-large eyes. Many of the facial proportions are stuffed up. Just popping a modern wig on an old portrait of dodgy veracity is plainly ridiculous. I was hoping to see some accurate forensic reconstructions based on the skulls or even death masks of the subjects.
Load More Replies... Mama Panda 5 years ago
Overall I am not pleased with these. The artist took liberties that she shouldn't have done. Giving them a slimmer face, slimmer neckline and elongating their faces makes them look cartoonish in quite a few of the recreations. To bring them more "up-to-date", changing their clothing and hairstyles should have been the only changes made to each of them.
ShireenAin'tWoke 5 years ago
I didn't want to be negative which is why my original comment was "..." but most people have said what I was going to say anyway.
Bláthnaid O’Loughlin 5 years ago
These looked like real people in the paintings, but the edited versions are seriously uncanny valley.
Sarah Conley 5 years ago
I agree. The angle of the painting/sculpture faces don't always match the photo they're put into, either.
Load More Replies... Devorah Firestone 5 years ago
A lot of the face shapes changed a lot, and there was too much straightening of the hair, a lot of which would have still been pretty tight after even modern straightening.
Karen Klinck 5 years ago
Although tight ringlets was the fashion of the time. Many had straight hair naturally.
Load More Replies... Animal Souls 5 years ago
I'm getting that women should not have curly hair vibe from this collection...
A Water Bottle 5 years ago
Don’t take this offensive but these don’t look very realistic, photoshop skills need to be a little more practiced. Pretty much what Giovanni said.
Mia 5 years ago
Most of these all just look like you slapped the painting/sculpture's face onto a random person. I don't want to be rude but I think this could've been done way better. I would've liked to look at one of these and think: 'Hey, that looks real, like I could actually see them looking like that.' sadly that's not the case.
Guy Fawkes 5 years ago
Pretty neat! Hope to see what Jesus, Emperor Qin or Genghis Khan might look like today.
Jim Ellington 5 years ago
I was crestfallen when I dropped my toothpaste.
Load More Replies... Catherine Elizabeth 5 years ago
Am I the only one who tried to figure out who the faces were photoshopped on to? 😂😂😂
Carol Emory 5 years ago
It would have been better not to use live body shots with drawn faces. It just looks so weird and artificial. I stopped looking after the first dozen.
Anabel Loera 4 years ago
I believe this was a great job, regardless of the images being accurate or not, photoshop practice or not... It was just simply interesting to see how these characters from history would look like if they had been our contemporaries, I would actually love to see more like this...
Pamela Griffin 5 years ago
Nefertiti could not have been Black sub-Sahara African. There was not a Black African population in Egypt. She might have come from the areas known today as Iran, Turkey, etc., but not sub-Sahara Africa. https://www.yahoo.com/news/whos-mummy-genetic-secrets-ancient-egypt-unwrapped-192854972.html
Karen Klinck 5 years ago
Unless there was Kush in the gene pool. There were black Pharoahs...
Load More Replies... s nedunuri 5 years ago
Nice, too bad they're all European or European origin. Why not some reconstructions of Buddha, Shah Jehan (contemporary of queeen Elizabeth, built the Taj Mahal) or Omar Khayyam?
Karen Klinck 5 years ago
Do we have verified portraits of them? I think that was the deciding factor...
Load More Replies... Carole Mclean-Smith 5 years ago
Brilliant -but mostly the faces have been narrowed and elongated, loved them though.
John Chovan 5 years ago
It's fun. Who cares if it's accurate? I would think that today, many men would be sporting mustaches, stubble, goatees, or beards, though.
Barbara Colautti 2 years ago
That portrait is no more Katherine Parr than I am. The portrait is another of Elizabeth 1st.
Sofia Micciche 2 years ago
Alright, yes, the photoshopping isin't "on point" and everything. But this person still tried, please try and cool this hate. I would like to see all of us do better. 😭
Lynn Delano 4 years ago
I think it’s clever. I didn’t expect historical accuracy; you’d need a skull for that and an expensive scientific process. But as the author wrote of Catherine of Aragon, there are many depictions of these historical figures. It’s clever and interesting to take a portrait and put it in a modern context. It really changes the appearance, even though you can match up the face to the old portrait, feature to feature.
Marek Židův 4 years ago
nice to see that someone´s interested in history and archaeology, but let me tell you, that history is definitely not perceived as a series of events by historians, neither as a character´s story arcs.. Well done though
Nell Blackwoodson 5 years ago
I love these and this overall concept. My only real gripe is that all of the women have long, flowing hair, whereas many if not most modern women in our culturehave short hair of some kind. (As some-one who personally has long flowing hair, it gets commented on a lot be-cause many people just don't see that so often these days ) I'd love to see more modern haircuts on some of these historical women.
Thomas Kaxe 5 years ago
So.. Putting painted faces on real peoples bodies using photoshop, counts as headline news these days? Well, do I have some news for you then! I got loads of news!
Thomas Kaxe 5 years ago
So putting a drawings face on a real persons body, using photoshop, is frontpage news these days? Well, do I have some news for you then!
Pamela Valemont 5 years ago
I actually enjoyed flicking through them. Sometimes I thought they could have got it better, but mostly it is a fascinating insight. Thank you.
NIGERUNDAYOOOO 5 years ago
im sorry but my weeb a*s gotta do this. CAESAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR!!!!
Elisa Gillies 5 years ago
Fine arts, that's something good to spend time with historical facts. Thankyou for the read.
Hollie Ramsey 5 years ago
Nefertiti and Caesar were great.. and then it kind of went downhill from there.
Annette Segal 5 years ago
Some of these are very poor...while most are passable. Nothing exceptional to view.
Viv Hart 5 years ago
These can't be taken at face value - in Greek & Roman days, sculptures were all very similar, later on, the same happened with painting, there was a style for each era, especially in the 1400's & 1500's. Only much later a more naturalistic style developed. Most of Holbein's models looked similar, also Rembrandt, Vermeer, etc.
Andrew Johnson 5 years ago
Incorrect. Both Julius Caesar and Caligula were well known for their blond hair. Dark hair was extremely rare in the Italian Pennisula before the Moorish occupation.
K Lane 5 years ago
These pics are either of people that few of us have heard of, or just shoved today's clothes on an old painting. Pointless
anotherboredpanda 5 years ago
If you didn't know at least 70% of them, you've got some serious catching up to do
Load More Replies... Sunny Hernandez 5 years ago
Lighten up, geez! It was fun. Photoshop is here to stay, hate it or not. 🙄
Giovanni 5 years ago
We like photoshop but they don't know how to use it.
Load More Replies... Colleen Coughlin 5 years ago
Paintings NEVER truly looked like the actual individual...so unfortunately... someone's time was greatly wasted on Photoshop
blazeaglory 3 years ago
Jeesh it's annoying reading comment sections any more. Everyone acts like they have every answer to every question NEVER asked. Guess what? NO ONE CARES WHAT YOU THINK . Not to mention the majority of comments in most comment sections are usually negative in regards to perceived errors and what "should have" been done. If people would just pull their heads out of their own a$$e$ and actually learn something or count to 10 and try to understand what you're reading before making assumptions in the form of directive opinions passed of as psuedo factual. YES YOU!
Bobbi Gardner 4 years ago
Look why don't all of you who don't like these try to do them yourself and publish them here. I would love to see the results!!
John Hanson 5 years ago
Most of the royals pictured all looked a little downsy on the eyes. I guess that can be expected when ya have uncle/brothers and such. Spent to much time in the shallow end of the gene pool. If it werent for the occasional butler or servant knocking up one of them the gene pool would have dried up into some real hills have eyes kind of sh@t.
Miranda Faulkner 5 years ago
I mean would have been nice to see some people of color.... 😩 diversity made up our past and all we get is whitewashed garbage?
Karen Klinck 5 years ago
There was no diversity in Medieval Europe. This batch is all from then (except for Grace Kelly.)
Load More Replies... Becky Moore 5 years ago
Nearly all the men (and some of the women) have got large noses. Maybe we'd have more too if it weren't for plastic surgery?
You May Like 203 History Trivia Questions To Remind You Of High School 30 Intriguing True Stories From The Past Few Know About What They Saw, What They Knew: 50 Breathtaking Historical Images From Eyes Long Closed
Eligijus Sinkunas
Viktorija Ošikaitė
Dominyka
Related on Bored Panda
