Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

BoredPanda Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

“HBO Defends JK Rowling’s Right To Her Views”: Fans Outraged Over Harry Potter Series Involvement

“HBO Defends JK Rowling’s Right To Her Views”: Fans Outraged Over Harry Potter Series Involvement

“HBO Defends JK Rowling’s Right To Her Views”: Fans Outraged Over Harry Potter Series InvolvementFans Slam HBO’s Support Of JK Rowling: “The Show Is Gonna Tank, And It’s Gonna Be Awesome”HBO Faces Backlash For Defending JK Rowling’s Views, Fans Call For Harry Potter Series’ Downfall“Bad Choices”: Fans Slam HBO For Defending JK Rowling On Transgender Day Of RemembranceHBO Defends J.K. Rowling’s Opinions On Transgender Day Of Remembrance, Sparks OutrageHBO's Support For J.K. Rowling's “Bad Choices”: HBO Under Fire For Backing JK Rowling’s Right To Express Her Views On Trans DayHBO Sparks Fury For Backing J.K. Rowling On Transgender Day Of Remembrance: Fans Slam HBO After They Back J.K. Rowling's HBO Under Fire For Backing JK Rowling’s Right To Express Her Views On Trans Day
ADVERTISEMENT

HBO is at the center of controversy for supporting JK Rowling, the acclaimed author of the Harry Potter universe, stating that she has the right to express her “personal views” after confirming her involvement in the upcoming Harry Potter TV series.

The 59-year-old has been widely criticized by a large portion of the book’s fanbase for holding on to trans-exclusionary views and being, in their eyes, transphobic.

Highlights
  • HBO supports J.K. Rowling's right to express views despite backlash.
  • Rowling involved in new Harry Potter series as writer and director selector.
  • Actors Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson publicly oppose Rowling's views.
  • HBO faces mixed reactions over support for Rowling during show announcement.

The author has defended herself vigorously, denying the label and stating that her opinions are intended to protect and support human rights.

“HBO is very proud of continuing its history of bad choices,” said one user. Others echoed similar sentiments and predicted the downfall of the upcoming production due to her involvement.

HBO is receiving backlash from Harry Potter fans for defending JK Rowling’s right to “express her views” on Transgender Day of Remembrance

Image credits: AA / ABACA / Vida Press

Far from backing off, the network reaffirmed its support for the author, stating that it has “been working with J.K. Rowling and in the Harry Potter business for over 20 years,” calling her contributions “invaluable.”

The ambitious series, announced during the company’s Q4 earnings call on February 23, 2024, is expected to debut in 2026 and will run for seven seasons, corresponding to each book.

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: Ester Marie Doysabas / Unsplash

“JK Rowling has a right to express her personal views,” the statement continued, which coincided with Transgender Day of Remembrance (November 20). “We will remain focused on developing the new series, which will only benefit from her involvement.”

Image credits: Variety

Referring to the extent of her participation, HBO chief Casey Bloys revealed at a press event that Rowling had a great deal of power when it came to selecting the show’s writer and director, but assured the audience that her personal views had no effect on said selection process.

The protagonists of the Harry Potter movies, Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson, have been at the forefront of criticism directed at the author

Image credits: sbstryker

Criticism towards Rowling has not been limited only to the fans of The Wizarding World but also to its protagonists. Emma Watson and Daniel Radcliffe have been outspoken in the past about their conflicting views towards the author, with the latter stating that her remarks make him “really sad.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Rowling, on the other hand, wrote a tweet on April 10, 2024, mentioning the Harry Potter alums as part of several “celebs who cozied up to a movement intent on eroding women’s hard-won rights and who used their platforms to cheer on the transitioning of minors.”

Her statement is in accordance with the values of a movement called Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminism (TERF), which refers to individuals or groups within feminism who exclude transgender women from their definition of womanhood and feminist spaces.

Image credits: jk_rowling

The exchanges are the latest in a conversation that started in 2020 when Rowling expressed her views surrounding gender in a 3,600-word statement on her website, sharing her story as an abuse victim and stating that “if gender isn’t real, the lived reality of women globally is erased.”

Raddclife subsequently issued a statement reaffirming his belief that “transgender women are women” and reassuring his fanbase that Rowling’s views “are not the views of everyone associated with the Potter franchise.”

The series’ announcement was received with promises of a boycott by Rowling’s detractors, with the author subsequently mocking their intentions

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: Warner Bros. Pictures

This isn’t the first time fans have expressed concern about Rowling’s involvement in the upcoming show. A group announced its intentions to boycott the production after its announcement on April 12, 2023.

Rowling took to social media to mock their attempt, writing: “Activists in my mentions are trying to organize yet another boycott of my work, this time of the ‘Harry Potter’ TV show. As forewarned is forearmed, I’ve taken the precaution of laying in a large stock of champagne.”

Image credits: Warner Bros. Pictures

ADVERTISEMENT

Aside from HBO, the author has received the support of other film actors, including Helena Bonham Carter, who played Bellatrix Lestrange, and Jim Broadbent, who portrayed Horace Slughorn. The former said that the backlash was a “horrendous” attempt at “hounding” the writer, while the former expressed that Rowling is “amazing” and that he supports her.

ADVERTISEMENT

For the TV network, the adaptation presents an opportunity to portray the Harry Potter books with accuracy only allowed by the extended format of a multi-season series.

HBO’s comments elicited mixed reactions among viewers, with one side wishing for the show’s downfall and Rowling’s cancellation and the other congratulating the network

Image credits: Giles Anderson / Vida Press

“Gradually, this nonsense is ending. I’m happy companies and individuals are fighting back,” one reader wrote.

“The show is gonna tank, and it’s gonna be awesome,” another said.

“They have every right to show it,” a reader expressed. “You have the right not to watch it, so don’t. If the viewership is abysmal, then HBO and her will get the message.”

“Yes, we need to ban the production of all movies and films that are not from pure, flawless people or simply someone who doesn’t conform to popular opinion,” another said sarcastically.

“I’ve been meaning to cancel my subscription,” wrote one viewer, with others joining in to voice their displeasure at Rowling’s involvement in the upcoming series

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: deltamagnet

Image credits: HMWritten

Image credits: davey_fox83

Image credits: HopeOfTheEndles

Image credits: WitchyWhittaker

Image credits: AuntieNiz

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: segarrapaulita

Image credits: thephil1

Image credits: SnyderQueen_

Image credits: 3mu7yod

Ic_polls

Poll Question

Thanks! Check out the results:

Share on Facebook
Abel Musa Miño

Abel Musa Miño

Writer, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

Abel is a journalist at Bored Panda. Born in Santiago, Chile, he holds a Bachelor's degree in Communication and a diploma in International Relations. In his spare time, you can find him tinkering with his motorbike, playing with his dog, or reading a good novel.

Read less »
Abel Musa Miño

Abel Musa Miño

Writer, BoredPanda staff

Abel is a journalist at Bored Panda. Born in Santiago, Chile, he holds a Bachelor's degree in Communication and a diploma in International Relations. In his spare time, you can find him tinkering with his motorbike, playing with his dog, or reading a good novel.

Renan Duarte

Renan Duarte

Author, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

Read less »

Renan Duarte

Renan Duarte

Author, BoredPanda staff

This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

What do you think ?
Add photo comments
POST
Aboredpanda
Community Member
2 hours ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I know I'll only be downvoted brutally, but I think this is all bordering on hysterical. There's a comment here comparing a childrens book author to Hitler... I remember a time where people having apparently opposing views didn't mean so much; where we could talk calmly with eachother and try to understand eachother. Accepting that sometimes we disagree and that it was ok. Sex is a fact. Gender is a construct. These things can exist at the same time. The world is not black and white, and if it's seen as such, there will be so much conflict and pain. Look at the USA these days. So polarized the rest of the world is watching in stunned horror. Why does this need to be the cross people die on? We really don't know enough about the effects of gender change to make any decitions about what is good or bad here. It's perfectly normal to care for and accept that someone exists and feels a certain way, without agreeing with them. OR agreeing it's right for them, but not feeling the same.

Marnie
Community Member
1 hour ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Well said. I'm in the US. Most of my views are liberal, as per what that means in the US. My general philosophy is let people do what they want, if they aren't hurting anyone. Now, where my views get murkier is the question - what if the only person they are hurting is themselves? That's one of the differences between libertarian and liberal. I think there are conversations to be had that are not being had on the liberal side. And if you try to have them, you are labelled as bigoted (in the US, anyway). Should trans girls/women be able to compete with the cisgender girls/women? I think that's something worth discussing. It's not black and white, and you're not a transphobe for thinking it's not an automatic "yes". The difference between the fight for gay rights and fight for trans rights is gay people are not asking me to give up anything, change anything, and are not hurting me in anyway. The same can not be said for everything that comes with trans rights. They are not comparable.

Load More Replies...
Aroace tiger (she/they/he)
Community Member
6 hours ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

If an opinion is harmless its fine. Transphobia isn't harmless. Swap the shìt she spouts but change the minority. Its not an opinion- its discrimination

UKGrandad
Community Member
3 hours ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Do you really not understand the fallacy of that argument? 'If was said about another group...' If that's how it works then nobody will ever be able to make negative statements about anything. Can I not say that I dislike clowns because it would be wrong to say the same thing about disabled people? When somebody is talking about a specific group you can't criticise them on the grounds that what they say would be discrimination IF it was being said about a different group. EDIT: Dearest downvoters, I've said it before and I'll say it again; if you think I'm wrong then tell me why what I said is wrong. I have shown in many comment threads over the years that when I am shown to be in error I accept and admit to my mistakes. Over to you, my darlings.

Load More Replies...
Apatheist Account2
Community Member
4 hours ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Well, those companies that have gone with trans people (such as Budweiser) didn't do too well out of it, so following the vocal minority may not be such a good idea as you think. She - as a woman - is entitled to a view as to whether she's comfortable with biological males in women-only spaces. I think, as men, we should perhaps stay out of that debate, since it's far less threatening for us to have trans men in men-only spaces. She's entitled to her opinion and believes she is protecting an encroachment on to women's rights - the issue here for me is whether or not this is a good series. Doubtless there will be some diversity to keep everyone happy, but it will be interesting to see how close they get to the books (which do, incidentally, have a fair bit of diversity). The main problem will be that whoever plays Snape will look completely inadequate compared with Alan Rickman.

Load More Replies...
Load More Comments
Aboredpanda
Community Member
2 hours ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I know I'll only be downvoted brutally, but I think this is all bordering on hysterical. There's a comment here comparing a childrens book author to Hitler... I remember a time where people having apparently opposing views didn't mean so much; where we could talk calmly with eachother and try to understand eachother. Accepting that sometimes we disagree and that it was ok. Sex is a fact. Gender is a construct. These things can exist at the same time. The world is not black and white, and if it's seen as such, there will be so much conflict and pain. Look at the USA these days. So polarized the rest of the world is watching in stunned horror. Why does this need to be the cross people die on? We really don't know enough about the effects of gender change to make any decitions about what is good or bad here. It's perfectly normal to care for and accept that someone exists and feels a certain way, without agreeing with them. OR agreeing it's right for them, but not feeling the same.

Marnie
Community Member
1 hour ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Well said. I'm in the US. Most of my views are liberal, as per what that means in the US. My general philosophy is let people do what they want, if they aren't hurting anyone. Now, where my views get murkier is the question - what if the only person they are hurting is themselves? That's one of the differences between libertarian and liberal. I think there are conversations to be had that are not being had on the liberal side. And if you try to have them, you are labelled as bigoted (in the US, anyway). Should trans girls/women be able to compete with the cisgender girls/women? I think that's something worth discussing. It's not black and white, and you're not a transphobe for thinking it's not an automatic "yes". The difference between the fight for gay rights and fight for trans rights is gay people are not asking me to give up anything, change anything, and are not hurting me in anyway. The same can not be said for everything that comes with trans rights. They are not comparable.

Load More Replies...
Aroace tiger (she/they/he)
Community Member
6 hours ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

If an opinion is harmless its fine. Transphobia isn't harmless. Swap the shìt she spouts but change the minority. Its not an opinion- its discrimination

UKGrandad
Community Member
3 hours ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Do you really not understand the fallacy of that argument? 'If was said about another group...' If that's how it works then nobody will ever be able to make negative statements about anything. Can I not say that I dislike clowns because it would be wrong to say the same thing about disabled people? When somebody is talking about a specific group you can't criticise them on the grounds that what they say would be discrimination IF it was being said about a different group. EDIT: Dearest downvoters, I've said it before and I'll say it again; if you think I'm wrong then tell me why what I said is wrong. I have shown in many comment threads over the years that when I am shown to be in error I accept and admit to my mistakes. Over to you, my darlings.

Load More Replies...
Apatheist Account2
Community Member
4 hours ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Well, those companies that have gone with trans people (such as Budweiser) didn't do too well out of it, so following the vocal minority may not be such a good idea as you think. She - as a woman - is entitled to a view as to whether she's comfortable with biological males in women-only spaces. I think, as men, we should perhaps stay out of that debate, since it's far less threatening for us to have trans men in men-only spaces. She's entitled to her opinion and believes she is protecting an encroachment on to women's rights - the issue here for me is whether or not this is a good series. Doubtless there will be some diversity to keep everyone happy, but it will be interesting to see how close they get to the books (which do, incidentally, have a fair bit of diversity). The main problem will be that whoever plays Snape will look completely inadequate compared with Alan Rickman.

Load More Replies...
Load More Comments
Related on Bored Panda
Related on Bored Panda
Trending on Bored Panda
Also on Bored Panda