Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

BoredPanda Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Norwegian TV Tests The Judgement Of Professional Stockbrokers Against Astrology, Beauty Bloggers, And Cow Poop
95

Norwegian TV Tests The Judgement Of Professional Stockbrokers Against Astrology, Beauty Bloggers, And Cow Poop

ADVERTISEMENT

Stock analysis is a complex field that people spend their lives and careers carefully studying. A Norwegian TV experiment has just shown, however, that investment know-how might as well be, in the most literal sense, a bunch of BS.

On the program Økonomiekspertene, Norway’s national broadcaster NRK gave 10,000 Norwegian kroner ($1,122) each to four teams to see where they would choose to invest it and what return they could get in three months. The competitors: two stockbrokers, an astrology expert, two beauty bloggers, and a herd of cows. The cows were allowed to roam over a grid of 25 company names and do what cows do. The producers then invested the cows’ money in the stocks on which the most cow patties had landed.

These cows’ investment decisions were as good as the pros

Image credits: RobinWigg

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: RobinWigg

Image credits: RobinWigg

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: RobinWigg

Image credits: RobinWigg

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: RobinWigg

Image credits: RobinWigg

Image credits: RobinWigg

Image credits: RobinWigg

Image credits: RobinWigg

The stars were not aligned for the astrologist, who lost out over the three months. The professionals were up a modest 7.28%, and out of the competitors, the influencers won big, gaining over 10%. Most notably, the cows equaled the performance of the professionals, with 7.26%. A screenshot shows a host talking with the matriarch of the herd, Gullros, hilariously credited as “milk producer.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The producers then showed the competitors their portfolio, which had earned a whopping 24%—they had invested in 20 different combinations and kept the one that did the best, demonstrating that betting on one lucky guess, as they had forced the competitors to do, isn’t the best way to do things in the real world.

But some of the lucky guesses were very lucky indeed. The influencers admitted they weren’t familiar with any of the companies and picked a pair based on their own liking for cruises and seafood. Gullros and friends joined the club of animals who don’t have any faculty of language or logic and don’t know what a stock is, but managed to do as well as the pros with completely random guesses. A previous experiment let a cat play with a toy mouse and then used the company names on the grid where he dropped it as stock advisory with similar results… so if you have a furry friend in your house, you might have nothing to lose by giving them some input on your finances.

Commenters think the art of stock analysis is a mystery

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: JoffreyThoms

Image credits: golden_rate

Image credits: Jbond069

Image credits: myChronomy

Image credits: lisaemmenegger

Image credits: Foreman1David

Image credits: designer_genes

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: thomashauer_at

Image credits: DheepJoy

Image credits: valpenis69

Image credits: toni_b

Image credits: euxtonbob

Share on Facebook
Lili North

Lili North

Author, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

Lili ended up in Vilnius, Lithuania out of her curiosity for studying languages, and stayed here out of sheer willpower. She loves cats maybe even a little more than the internet average and enjoys cooking videos despite only fantasizing about being able to make anything more complicated than fried rice.

Read less »
Lili North

Lili North

Author, BoredPanda staff

Lili ended up in Vilnius, Lithuania out of her curiosity for studying languages, and stayed here out of sheer willpower. She loves cats maybe even a little more than the internet average and enjoys cooking videos despite only fantasizing about being able to make anything more complicated than fried rice.

Ilona Baliūnaitė

Ilona Baliūnaitė

Author, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

I'm a Visual Editor at Bored Panda since 2017. I've searched through a multitude of images to create over 2000 diverse posts on a wide range of topics. I love memes, funny, and cute stuff, but I'm also into social issues topics. Despite my background in communication, my heart belongs to visual media, especially photography. When I'm not at my desk, you're likely to find me in the streets with my camera, checking out cool exhibitions, watching a movie at the cinema or just chilling with a coffee in a cozy place

Read less »

Ilona Baliūnaitė

Ilona Baliūnaitė

Author, BoredPanda staff

I'm a Visual Editor at Bored Panda since 2017. I've searched through a multitude of images to create over 2000 diverse posts on a wide range of topics. I love memes, funny, and cute stuff, but I'm also into social issues topics. Despite my background in communication, my heart belongs to visual media, especially photography. When I'm not at my desk, you're likely to find me in the streets with my camera, checking out cool exhibitions, watching a movie at the cinema or just chilling with a coffee in a cozy place

What do you think ?
Add photo comments
POST
Hans
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Please do not say "proves". In a world of fake news and distrust in science, we need to be careful. Even a longitudal scientific study with huge amount of data could only make suggestions and propose theories. However, _showing_ that astrology sucks is always a good thing. And debunking the myth that stocktrading is a craft is also fine.

Grumble O'Pug
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

We've forgotten debunking. It's "believe" or "don't believe" in, like you need to add faith or something when evidence alone is fine.

Load More Replies...
Dave P
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Remember 3 month short market betting is usually luck (unless "shorting" a specific stock), and there have been dozens of studies over the years, scientifically done, to prove that. Where the skill comes in is long term strategizing, stability, offsettings, etc. The real key would be a 2 year study, and the pro's in that case will come out on top.

Full Name
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think the show is funny, but for entertainment purposes only because if it was so easy then everyone would be making money that way. I know the markets well and I know that a dart board will lose every time in the long run.

Load More Replies...
Load More Comments
Hans
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Please do not say "proves". In a world of fake news and distrust in science, we need to be careful. Even a longitudal scientific study with huge amount of data could only make suggestions and propose theories. However, _showing_ that astrology sucks is always a good thing. And debunking the myth that stocktrading is a craft is also fine.

Grumble O'Pug
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

We've forgotten debunking. It's "believe" or "don't believe" in, like you need to add faith or something when evidence alone is fine.

Load More Replies...
Dave P
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Remember 3 month short market betting is usually luck (unless "shorting" a specific stock), and there have been dozens of studies over the years, scientifically done, to prove that. Where the skill comes in is long term strategizing, stability, offsettings, etc. The real key would be a 2 year study, and the pro's in that case will come out on top.

Full Name
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think the show is funny, but for entertainment purposes only because if it was so easy then everyone would be making money that way. I know the markets well and I know that a dart board will lose every time in the long run.

Load More Replies...
Load More Comments
Related on Bored Panda
Related on Bored Panda
Trending on Bored Panda
Also on Bored Panda