The referendum wasn't legally binding. They didn't have to go ahead at all. There was no knowledge as to what leaving the EU would look like or what would happen as it had not happened before. So many unknowns. It was stupid asking people to vote on something that that had no clear plan. The Government didn't understand it themselves at that stage (and barely do now!). We just got a lot of lies and sadly too many people believed them.

The problem is that not all the facts were to hand at the time of the vote. Many of the promises have turned out to be lies.......

If the majority believes a lie, it still is a lie.

It's been a couple of years since the vote to leave happened. We're in a much better position to know what we're getting (although the government still have failed to actually come up with a plan that they agree on). So the march was to let us have a final say over the deal.

This comment has been deleted.

The impact of EU law varies from sector to sector but in many areas - public order, crime, defence, health - EU laws have minimal impact. In others - workers' rights, trade - the impact is much greater because the single market and the free movement of workers are at the heart of what the EU is about. People think we're having EU laws thrust upon us constantly and it's simply not the case. Oh, and of course the EU is bureaucratic - that is it's function. If people don't know who their MEP is that speaks volumes about them and not the EU.

This comment has been deleted.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Yes, and most people on both sides of that debate don't seem to understand the many complicated factors of it, seem to be deciding their view on it based on really vague reasoning. These were not brilliant protest signs, just a generalized intellectually lazy liberalism (and I personally lean liberal). 'The apocalypse section has been moved to current affairs'? Oh yeah, clearly the UK is in an apocalypse post-Brexit, what a horrible hell hole it's been since that day!

The referendum wasn't binding. They didn't have to go ahead. There was no knowledge as to what leaving the EU would look like or what would happen. So many unknowns. Shouldn't have had a referendum without looking very, very closely at what leaving would mean FIRST and properly - not the David Davis 'oh, I did look at it... well, no I didn't really' that happened AFTER. You cannot knowledgeably vote for something when you don't have the knowledge. It's an absolute farce.

Factories would have closed anyway - they were inefficient and out of date.

Pick an answer Juta and stick with it.