This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Well, I know you obviously don’t believe, but for me, he created your uterus, and you. So he could! But he doesn’t. We have free will on this earth, and the choice to follow the guide he gave us. In his guide, it says that all life is valuable. That includes you, the trees, the crickets, and any child you might have inside you. Also, nice touch with the lower case g. It lets me know where you stand.

And P.C you're describing Spirituality which I do subscribe to and I was raised in a Christian household so I know exactly what you are trying to say and do. I am no longer religous myself due to people like you. I do believe in the connection of earth, but I'm also realistic and don't live in lala land. Are you going to feed, raise and take care of the unwanted children huh?? Or are you just going to continue shoving your beliefs down peoples throats ( and just because you say it in a nice way doesn't mean you aren't being an a*****e by forcing your beliefs on others). Your comment on Gidget Girl's use of lower case is a prime example of you being an undercover judgmental typical religious pro-birther. I have no problem with religion, I have a massive problem with people like you though.

…did it seem like I lost my cool? I think I got worked up again

“People like me.” I didnt Know you already knew everything about me! Who’s judgmental? I was just stating the obvious. That I knew gidgets’ positioning. Nothing judgmental, just observational. I’m sorry for whatever happened to you. I was just thinking about something similar lately! How some people say “this is wrong” or “this needs to be fixed” but they don’t do anything about it. And the people who say those kinds of things get tons of upvotes. Like, y’all are on the same page but still not doing anything. Anyway, like I said before, I do hope to adopt. And I know plenty of people in my church who have said God called them to foster

P.C. have you adopted or fostered?? If not, then you are pro-birth NOT pro-life.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

I’m too young to adopt =D but I’m hoping to in the future. I’m rather afraid of sex and birth anyway.

P.C. you have literally proven my point. Congrats. Now f**k off.

Rude! That’s very unkind to say to someone.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

I'm all for allowing the option, but your wording shows a clear disdain for carrying children, and your biases do nothing but strengthen the argument of those with different views. Moderate your tone if you want to have any modicum of persuasive effect.

Tristan - who was that comment for? It's not clear - P.C. or SPQRBob?? If it's for SPQRBob then no. Enough is enough, the pro-birthers protest and cause s**t and take away rights because their religion sees a fetus as 'life' whereas the other half of us don't. A fetus and a child are not the same thing. and SPQRBob use of words highlight that. His distain is not for the carrying of children, it is for the way that religious people see carrying a child as something sacred which we do NOT and they force it on us. They don't see that having a kid is not always a good thing and can be harmful and dangerous to both the mother and potential child. An unwanted child raised in poverty is just a slower more painful death than one aborted because the mother KNOWS they cannot provide for the child. SPQRBob can correct me if I'm wrong, but that's how I am reading it. Yall don't care if we speak gently and with kindness as the past has so clearly proven. So yeah maybe it is time to stop playing nice and start being brutally honest. Cause at the end of the day - this is nothing for the pro-birthers, just a little bitching here and there and an outing down to the clinic to force beliefs on others, but it's life or death for the woman. So I don't give a single s**t if it's offensive because being 'nice' and explaining it using 'gentle' language has been proven to not work. If we are mean and harsh enough, maybe they will finally leave us the f**k alone.

Yep. You nailed it.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

…first, I said I was pro-life, not pro-birth. But I understand where your stress for this situation is coming from. It’s an interesting situation. We’re overpopulating the earth, but at the same time, mass deaths are painful to hear about. Anyway, I know that people with religion leave a bad taste in everyone’s mouth because of their insistence. But I just want to say, the people who want these kids to live want it for good reasons. If a woman can’t feed her child but is pregnant, why does the child get punished for what the outside world is guilty for? Why is the woman not able to afford a child? I’m all for saving the woman if it’s her or the child, but for money to rule over life and death?

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

And what if they weren’t religious? What if I still valued life even though I don’t believe in God? We’re concerned about everything else. The plants, the animals, so why aren’t we concerned about the children who can’t even speak for themselves?