Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
then open in external browser
and click "Open in External Browser" 
A Central Florida grandmother has learned her fate, almost two and a half years since her infant granddaughter passed while she was under her care.
Just two days ago on April 3, Tracey Nix was sentenced to five years behind bars after she was found guilty of leaving 7-month-old Uriel Schock in a heated SUV on November 1, 2022, after just having returned home from grabbing lunch with her friends.
Highlights
- A Florida grandmother gets sentenced to 5 years in prison after leaving an infant in a hot car, resulting in her passing.
- Nix previously lost another grandchild who drowned under her care.
- A debate arose on grandparents' suitability to care for their grandchildren.
She was found not guilty of aggravated manslaughter by the jury, which would have locked her in jail for anywhere between 12 to 30 years.
BP Daily - Your Source for Unbiased Reporting
A Florida grandmother has been sentenced to years in jail after leaving an infant in a hot car for hours on end
Image credits: Kaila Nix Schock
The former school principal had gone inside her home at approximately 2pm, talked to her dog, and practiced the piano “for a long time” before finally remembering that she had left her granddaughter in the car, as reported by the arrested affidavit.
According to the New York Post, temperatures outside in Hardee County had already reached a scathing 90 degrees Fahrenheit.
About three hours after Nix went inside, she realized she had left the infant inside the car with the windows rolled up. Her husband tried his best to save her by performing CPR, but the girl sadly passed due to hypothermia, according to investigators.
Image credits: FOX 13 Tampa Bay
Image credits: FOX 13 Tampa Bay
Shockingly, this wasn’t the first time Nix’s actions caused the d–ath of a child.
Not even one year ago, the grandmother was in charge of taking care of her other grandchild, 16-month-old Ezra Schock, who had drowned under Nix’s watch after she had fallen asleep.
As stated by the Hardee County Sheriff’s Office, the little boy had opened the doors, sneaked under the fence, and wandered into the pond near his grandparents’ house.
Both of these tragic stories were spoken about during court on Thursday.
Previously, one of Nix’s grandchildren drowned under her care
Schock’s parents were present in the same room as Nix, describing the loss and sadness they felt after losing both their children — and how it felt to see the grandmother be sentenced.
Kaila Nix-Schock, the mother, struggled with an emotional battle as she addressed her own mother directly.
“I still love you. I hate this,” she managed through tears, according to Fox 13 Tampa. “I hate that I have to choose, but you know I had to. But it doesn’t change my heart.”
Image credits: Kaila Nix Schock
Her husband, Drew Schock also said that he and his wife had taken the extra precautions needed to protect Uriel after Ezra’s passing — but to no avail.
He said, “There are some things you don’t think about and, as parents, we have to live with that for the rest of our lives,” adding, “She’s done this twice and the fact that we’re debating whether she deserves jail time is just insane to me.”
In her own defense, the grandmother merely said she “forgot for a long period of time” that little Uriel was trapped in the car.
“I’m broken about what happened. I don’t want to leave anyone with the thought that I’m making excuses, because I’m not,” she said.
Her daughter claimed that she still “loved” Nix, despite what happened
Image credits: Kaila Nix Schock
In light of the hearings, the judge of the case has decided to sentence Nix to the maximum sentence, claiming she showed no remorse to the situation — merely sorrow.
When news of the tragedy broke, those online had varying reactions, but the majority questioned why Uriel’s parents would leave another one of their children in Nix’s care after she had already failed to properly take care of Ezra.
“I trust my mom with my life, but it’d only take one d–ath for that to end. Leaving a second child with her is unimaginable,” one person wrote.
Another theorized, “Grandma is obviously unsuitable/responsible to look after children maybe has dementia, forgetfulness?
“After the first incident of her neglecting her grandchild I can’t see why the mum again entrusted her with her second child? It doesn’t add up!”
Image credits: FOX 13 Tampa Bay
“After the first baby, I would NEVER leave another child in her care,” a third echoed. “I dont care if it was an accident the first time. I would never risk another childs life.”
Someone stated, “That’s why you have to be careful! Not all grandparents are mentally capable to take care of babies.”
Ultimately, this brings up the question of whether grandparents should or should not care for their grandchildren — is it their obligation and even if it is, are they fit enough to do so?
According to a thread on Reddit, many millennials were “practically raised by their grandparents” because their own parents were off working or couldn’t afford childcare.
Nix was found not guilty of aggravated assault, which would have landed her in prison for longer
Image credits: ABC Action News
But times have changed, and the younger generation is now sharing stories of how their parents refuse to watch their children, or expect to be compensated for it.
“They want to be asked to do it but they just don’t want to follow through,” read the top comment. “Like wanting to be invited to the party but not wanting to go.”
Another said, “Now that our parents retired and are more financially stable, they want to enjoy their golden years.”
One user recalled that due to the trauma and disability of their father, they wouldn’t necessarily see him as an “easy babysitter.”
Comments thought it strange that the parents would leave another baby in Nix’s care after the tragedy that happened the first time
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
Explore more of these tags
What do you think ?
Nikki Gross 8 months ago (edited)
Why in the blue hell would you trust her with another child?! The woman already proved that she was not fit to take care of a child. Why would you even think about leaving her alone with a second child, who is also a little baby? Please someone, make this, make sense.
Ms.GB 8 months ago
I don't understand how it could happen again!? Either Grandma has dementia or she's doing it on purpose and I absolutely can't believe that the parents let her babysit again!
Load More Replies...
Gracie Jay 8 months ago
I don’t care if there is no other affordable option, the parents should’ve known the grandmother wasn’t capable of caring for children. My mom was an excellent caregiver and babysat grandkids countless times. After a couple things happened (no one was harmed though) it seemed like she was just forgetting she was babysitting, I told my brother she wasn’t capable anymore of babysitting. Turns out she had been having mini strokes, which culminated into a large stroke. MRI’s showed she had a huge dead spot in her brain from them. This was the parents fault.
Gracie Jay 8 months ago
Also, the grandmother probably has no idea that she isn’t of sound mind anymore. This should’ve been entirely on the parents.
Load More Replies...
superfluous 8 months ago
Why are people tearing into the mother Kaila Nix Schock so much? BOTH parents are responsible for their children! (which some commenters did say). Also, saying grandparents (who range in age from possibly 28 years old on up) aren't fit to watch grandchildren is absolutely insane! It's a case by case situation, and in the vast majority of cases ABSOLUTELY fine. I'm more inclined to say young people shouldn't be trusted with children - they're inexperienced (being sarcastic here). But yeah, really odd IN THIS CASE they left their child with her. And unbelievably sad.
Kim Gatlin 8 months ago
28? Either that math ain't mathing or we've got some serious issues here.
Load More Replies...
Amelia Jade 8 months ago
My mom's views on how to care for kids differed greatly from mine. She once proudly told me how she physically disciplined my son by pinching him because he was annoying her. He wasn't even doing anything he wasn't supposed to be doing. He was 2 and watching her do her hair and the bathroom door would naturally swing partially shut and he kept pushing it back open as he sat on the floor. She didn't like it so she pinched him until he cried. I was in the house. But just her telling me that happened was enough for me to know she was never going to be alone with my kids. Even when I had to have surgery and had no childcare options--I opted to go to the hospital without my husband so he could be home with the kids. My mom was never an option. Accidental drownings happen, but she opted to take a nap while a child was in her care. That's weird, and that would have been enough for me to never let her be alone with my kids.
Trillian 8 months ago (edited)
Maybe if there was proper and affordable childcare, people wouldn't have to rely on family members who are clearly unfit.
Bookworm 8 months ago
It's infuriating the parents weren't also charged. At a minimum they were negligent in leaving a second child with her unsupervised after their first child drowned in her "care".
TruthoftheHeart 8 months ago
There are many people in the world who have lost children to accidental drowning you can't argue that that automatically would make them negligent however I would haves still not Left my kid with her
Load More Replies...
Bananaramamama 8 months ago
As a working parent I will never forget the day I was dropping one kid off at school, supposed to take the baby to the sitters and was on the highway rushing to work when I heard a giggle from the back seat. I had literally forgotten to take the baby to the sitter. Even though there was no immediate danger in the moment I destroyed myself for weeks and couldn't stop thinking that if he hadn't made a noise I may have never realized. So I completely understand that sleep deprived parents may genuinely f**k up. But I watched most of this woman's trial. She was almost immune to the testimony of witnesses and remarkably stoic. The first baby died because she decided to take a nap. She showed blatant disregard then. I couldn't have left another baby with her.
Schmebulock 8 months ago
I think they parents should be guilty of some crime. They should be investigated for trying to get rid of their kids.
Ruth Watry 8 months ago
Parents are partially responsible for the second death. Who leaves their child with somebody who fell asleep while watching their child, resulting in their child's death?
Nikki Gross 8 months ago (edited)
Why in the blue hell would you trust her with another child?! The woman already proved that she was not fit to take care of a child. Why would you even think about leaving her alone with a second child, who is also a little baby? Please someone, make this, make sense.
Ms.GB 8 months ago
I don't understand how it could happen again!? Either Grandma has dementia or she's doing it on purpose and I absolutely can't believe that the parents let her babysit again!
Load More Replies... Gracie Jay 8 months ago
I don’t care if there is no other affordable option, the parents should’ve known the grandmother wasn’t capable of caring for children. My mom was an excellent caregiver and babysat grandkids countless times. After a couple things happened (no one was harmed though) it seemed like she was just forgetting she was babysitting, I told my brother she wasn’t capable anymore of babysitting. Turns out she had been having mini strokes, which culminated into a large stroke. MRI’s showed she had a huge dead spot in her brain from them. This was the parents fault.
Gracie Jay 8 months ago
Also, the grandmother probably has no idea that she isn’t of sound mind anymore. This should’ve been entirely on the parents.
Load More Replies... superfluous 8 months ago
Why are people tearing into the mother Kaila Nix Schock so much? BOTH parents are responsible for their children! (which some commenters did say). Also, saying grandparents (who range in age from possibly 28 years old on up) aren't fit to watch grandchildren is absolutely insane! It's a case by case situation, and in the vast majority of cases ABSOLUTELY fine. I'm more inclined to say young people shouldn't be trusted with children - they're inexperienced (being sarcastic here). But yeah, really odd IN THIS CASE they left their child with her. And unbelievably sad.
Kim Gatlin 8 months ago
28? Either that math ain't mathing or we've got some serious issues here.
Load More Replies... Amelia Jade 8 months ago
My mom's views on how to care for kids differed greatly from mine. She once proudly told me how she physically disciplined my son by pinching him because he was annoying her. He wasn't even doing anything he wasn't supposed to be doing. He was 2 and watching her do her hair and the bathroom door would naturally swing partially shut and he kept pushing it back open as he sat on the floor. She didn't like it so she pinched him until he cried. I was in the house. But just her telling me that happened was enough for me to know she was never going to be alone with my kids. Even when I had to have surgery and had no childcare options--I opted to go to the hospital without my husband so he could be home with the kids. My mom was never an option. Accidental drownings happen, but she opted to take a nap while a child was in her care. That's weird, and that would have been enough for me to never let her be alone with my kids.
Trillian 8 months ago (edited)
Maybe if there was proper and affordable childcare, people wouldn't have to rely on family members who are clearly unfit.
Bookworm 8 months ago
It's infuriating the parents weren't also charged. At a minimum they were negligent in leaving a second child with her unsupervised after their first child drowned in her "care".
TruthoftheHeart 8 months ago
There are many people in the world who have lost children to accidental drowning you can't argue that that automatically would make them negligent however I would haves still not Left my kid with her
Load More Replies... Bananaramamama 8 months ago
As a working parent I will never forget the day I was dropping one kid off at school, supposed to take the baby to the sitters and was on the highway rushing to work when I heard a giggle from the back seat. I had literally forgotten to take the baby to the sitter. Even though there was no immediate danger in the moment I destroyed myself for weeks and couldn't stop thinking that if he hadn't made a noise I may have never realized. So I completely understand that sleep deprived parents may genuinely f**k up. But I watched most of this woman's trial. She was almost immune to the testimony of witnesses and remarkably stoic. The first baby died because she decided to take a nap. She showed blatant disregard then. I couldn't have left another baby with her.
Schmebulock 8 months ago
I think they parents should be guilty of some crime. They should be investigated for trying to get rid of their kids.
Ruth Watry 8 months ago
Parents are partially responsible for the second death. Who leaves their child with somebody who fell asleep while watching their child, resulting in their child's death?
You May Like “Everyone Felt It”: Conspiracy Theorists Go Wild Over Clip Of Soldier During Presidential Speech Japan Government Takes Aim At Finland After Beauty Queen Is Stripped Of Title Over Racist Gesture
Gabija Saveiskyte
Gabija Saveiskyte
Related on Bored Panda
32
39