Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

BoredPanda Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Employee Gets Fired For His Stand-Up Jokes, Takes Legal Action Against The Company And Wins
29

Employee Gets Fired For His Stand-Up Jokes, Takes Legal Action Against The Company And Wins

Interview With Author Employee Gets Fired For His Stand-Up Jokes, Takes Legal Action Against The Company And WinsStand-Up Comedian Gets Fired From His Day Job For His Bits, Wins The Court Case Against His CompanyWorker Gets Let Go From His Company For His Stand-Up Jokes, Takes Legal Action Against It And WinsStand-Up Comedian Gets Fired From His Job For His Jokes, Wins The Legal Battle Against That CompanyGuy Does Stand-Up Comedy On The Side, Company Finds Out And Fires Him On The SpotMan Pursues Stand-Up Comedy Career On The Side, Company Learns Of It And Fires Him Without A WarningEmployee Gets Fired For His Stand-Up Jokes, Takes Legal Action Against The Company And WinsEmployee Gets Fired For His Stand-Up Jokes, Takes Legal Action Against The Company And WinsEmployee Gets Fired For His Stand-Up Jokes, Takes Legal Action Against The Company And WinsEmployee Gets Fired For His Stand-Up Jokes, Takes Legal Action Against The Company And Wins
ADVERTISEMENT

We all have some activities outside of our work. They usually don’t bother anyone, but the more public they are, the more carefully we have to tread.

As one Redditor found out, these activities can sometimes cost you your job. When his day job company found out about the stand-up comedy bit he does on the side, the guy was fired on the spot. However, he wouldn’t go down that easily and took the matter to the court. Scroll down to read the full story!

More info: Reddit

RELATED:

    Working while pursuing a comedy career can be challenging, but it’s even more difficult if your company doesn’t share your sense of humor

    Image credits: Curtis Potvin (not the actual photo)

    The man worked as a reporter at a public media organization for 5 years while doing stand-up comedy on the side, which nobody seemed to mind

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Austin Distel (not the actual photo)

    ADVERTISEMENT

    When the management found out about it, he was called into a meeting and fired on the spot without any warning or a chance of fixing the situation

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: JSLEI1

    Image credits: Jakob Owens (not the actual photo)

    The man didn’t give up and took the matter to court, where the company tried to paint his comedy as hateful

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: JSLEI1

    The judge ruled in the man’s favor, and the company had to reinstate him with a full year’s back pay

    The OP began by saying that he has worked as a reporter for The Pulse made by WHYY for 5 years. But when he’s not helping make science shows, the guy loves to spend his time doing stand-up comedy, going by the name Jad Slay.

    The man explained that his team and the boss had long been aware of his side activity and had no objections. However, recently, the author got called into a meeting where he was accused of violating the company’s values because he posted his comedy reels on Instagram.

    While the poster admitted that his act wasn’t the cleanest, he also said that he’s completely unknown as a comedian and performs to various crowds, who all seem to enjoy his humor and find no reason to be offended. Unfortunately, no one seemed to care about anything he was saying, and the guy got fired without any warning or a chance to fix the situation, even though health insurance was vital to the OP due to his illness.

    Jad decided to stand his ground and fight back. He took the matter to the court, where the company representatives tried to brand him racist, sexist, and every other tag in the book. They even made the judge watch an hour of the man’s stand-up, taking every opportunity to paint it in ugly colors, but, in the end, the judge ruled against them.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Some months later, the company hoped to get back at the OP through arbitration hearings, where they were once again unsuccessful. The decision was made that the man was to be reinstated with a full year’s back pay and benefits.

    The commenters under this post were divided. Some applauded the comedian for handling the situation and bad-mouthed the company. But, at the same time, others were less supportive, saying that according to the decision doc, the guy only won because of his union contract/position and that the ruling didn’t vindicate his comedy routines.

    Image credits: EKATERINA BOLOVTSOVA (not the actual photo)

    Bored Panda reached out to Jad Sleiman, the comedian and the author of this story, for some additional commentary, and he gladly answered our questions.

    When asked what inspired him to share this story online, he explained that he wanted to encourage others to fight back because no one has the right to limit people’s freedom of speech and creative expression. “Stand-up is one of the few things that makes me less afraid of my multiple sclerosis, and to think some exec who doesn’t like a joke can up and decide to take that away is obscene,” said Jad, adding, “No one can put hate in your heart.”

    The comedian said another reason was the discouragement he felt when, after getting fired, people acted as if it was expected to get one’s life ruined over some harmless fun during off hours. It pained him that we tend to surrender so easily.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    This wasn’t the end of the challenges for Jad. After the incident, everybody seemed to believe the company’s accusations without doing any research themselves. The man was quickly painted as hateful, and the public was turned against him. 

    Having his health insurance cut off, the comedian also struggled to get his sclerosis medicine, which undoubtedly impacted his quality of life. Fortunately, since the man was a Marine Corps veteran, these bills were eventually covered by the Veteran’s Affairs Department.

    However, Jad also managed to find some silver lining in this whole mess. “Getting fired forced me to move to New York and go for broke on this stand-up thing, and it’s been like living a dream. I’ve been on more and better shows than ever before, and I feel actually quite lucky. I’ve made a lot of very funny friends, and it’s awesome just biking around the city doing spots.”

    As of yet, there have been no new developments in the story, and the whole situation stands as it was written on Reddit. The man explained that the company could still decide to appeal, but he was certain they would lose, as arbitrations are very difficult to overturn.

    Image credits: jadslay

    Making a living off comedy alone is a very challenging thing that only a few ever manage to do. However, even if it’s hard to achieve, it doesn’t mean it’s impossible. While doing stand-up alone might not be enough, depending on your act, there are a few other activities that you could engage in using your comedic talents, and Stand Up Comedy Clinic is here to tell us what they are.

    According to the article, you could:

    • Perform comedy shows at colleges.
    • Do comedic entertainment on cruise ships.
    • Take on corporate gigs or write humorous speeches for CEOs, corporate presenters, or politicians.
    • Perform comedy shows as fundraisers for non-profit organizations or schools.
    • Write for talk shows, magazines, or internet sites.
    • Create a comedy blog, podcast, or YouTube channel, build a follower base, and sell advertisements or merchandise with the possibility of getting a sponsor.
    • Do comedy spots on TV.
    • Go on tours with bands and open for them on the road.
    • Write sitcoms, animated explainers, and comedy scripts.
    • Try writing a comedy movie.

    Ultimately, while comedy is undoubtedly enjoyed by many, it isn’t easy to earn your daily bread with. As long as you can balance it all, there is no shame in having a day job and doing these stand-up gigs on the side. Just be careful and ensure you won’t get fired for it because there’s no guarantee you’ll walk out a winner like Jad did, and even his journey was far from pleasant.

    What did you think of this story? Who do you think was in the right here? Share your thoughts below!

    Image credits: Stewart Munro (not the actual photo)

    Ic_polls

    Poll Question

    Thanks! Check out the results:

    Share on Facebook
    Dominykas Zukas

    Dominykas Zukas

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    Read more »

    Hey! I’m Dominykas, and I come from Lithuania. According to my diploma, I’m a UX Designer. However, when during my studies, I (re)discovered my passion for storytelling, I’ve been doing that ever since, mostly in writing. I have written a few short stories, some songs, and a good bunch of articles, and I plan to keep expanding on all these fronts. Aside from that, I’m also a film buff, traveler, casual basketball player, video game enthusiast, and nature lover who will rarely pass up on a little hike through the forest or a simple walk around a park.

    Read less »
    Dominykas Zukas

    Dominykas Zukas

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    Hey! I’m Dominykas, and I come from Lithuania. According to my diploma, I’m a UX Designer. However, when during my studies, I (re)discovered my passion for storytelling, I’ve been doing that ever since, mostly in writing. I have written a few short stories, some songs, and a good bunch of articles, and I plan to keep expanding on all these fronts. Aside from that, I’m also a film buff, traveler, casual basketball player, video game enthusiast, and nature lover who will rarely pass up on a little hike through the forest or a simple walk around a park.

    Monika Pašukonytė

    Monika Pašukonytė

    Author, BoredPanda staff

    Read more »

    I am a visual editor here. In my free time I enjoy the vibrant worlds of art galleries, exhibitions, and soulful concerts. Yet, amidst life's hustle and bustle, I find solace in nature's embrace, cherishing tranquil moments with beloved friends. Deep within, I hold a dream close - to embark on a global journey in an RV, accompanied by my faithful canine companion. Together, we'll wander through diverse cultures, weaving precious memories under the starry night sky, fulfilling the wanderlust that stirs my soul.

    Read less »

    Monika Pašukonytė

    Monika Pašukonytė

    Author, BoredPanda staff

    I am a visual editor here. In my free time I enjoy the vibrant worlds of art galleries, exhibitions, and soulful concerts. Yet, amidst life's hustle and bustle, I find solace in nature's embrace, cherishing tranquil moments with beloved friends. Deep within, I hold a dream close - to embark on a global journey in an RV, accompanied by my faithful canine companion. Together, we'll wander through diverse cultures, weaving precious memories under the starry night sky, fulfilling the wanderlust that stirs my soul.

    What do you think ?
    Add photo comments
    POST
    marinarocha avatar
    RACM
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Absolutely love this outcome. We need to be very mindful of what a power hungry, addicted to recreational outrage group is attempting to do with an art form. Comedy is theater. This is just ridiculous. Imagining trying to regulate what other people use as an mental outlet and thinking you are right. This is very far from what we want in a society:

    apatheistaccount2 avatar
    Apatheist Account2
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I keep quoting Ricky Gervais: just because you're offended, it doesn't mean you're right. Some people can't tell the difference between a joke about a subject and the subject itself; I had a similar (but much lower-level) experience when I made a comment that everyone but my director realised was satirical (I said something that clearly one shouldn't say, but that was the point of the joke), but I was called in and told off for it (fortunately not sacked like the OP).

    jikoti1046 avatar
    Jikoti
    Community Member
    9 months ago

    This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

    Sickening to see arthbach's comment getting downvoted. I can't even reply to it directly now, the site won't let me. Burn in hell, BP "community".

    Load More Replies...
    create_4beauty avatar
    greenideas
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The morality here is so off: telling an edgy joke is bad but cutting off a veteran's meds is a-ok. Yep, makes sense.

    impossiblekat avatar
    KatSaidWhat
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That. He didn't get fired for the jokes, he got fired because he had a recently diagnosed condition that could impact his employment.

    Load More Replies...
    kraneiathedancingdryad avatar
    Kraneia The Dancing Dryad
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Were they paying for his MS meds? Guarantee that was the real reason they tried to can him. But bad things happen when you fire someone over a medical issue. The standup just gave them a convenient excuse. It backfired because the judge actually looked at the material! 😁

    sonja_6 avatar
    Sonja
    Community Member
    9 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Comedy is always dark and a little problematic. It's the opposite side of drama. You need to be able to laugh about yourself and your flaws to enjoy comedy, especially when it hits home. Comedy is a way to make light of problems and to make the flaws easier visible. It has it's roots with the courts jester, who was the only one who couldn't tell the king the truth and hold him a mirror up by making fun of problems. People nowadays think that means he was allowed to poke the bear and be disparaging against the king, but that wasn't the case. If a jester would have tried that, he'd been killed. He made the king aware of his misdeeds by exaggeration of his degrees, including the negatives. By making fun of people who couldn't pay taxes, for example mimicking them crawling up to the throne and offering the clothes of their back, he pointed out that they have nothing more to give. He'd pretend to saw stones and expect them to grow into turnips to make the king aware his subjects needed seed. Etc.

    guessundheit avatar
    Guess Undheit
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Comedy attacks the powerful, not the weak. Court jesters made light of the king and the halls of power, not the peasantry.

    Load More Replies...
    jppennington avatar
    JayWantsACat
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don't really know how to feel about this. It feels very much the usual right wing grievance post about "MUh fReE sPEeCh", especially that it's conveniently NPR (which is a typical target of the chuds). But I'm almost always pro-labor regardless of how I feel about the company and he names the company itself. It's also weird how he keeps justifying himself because people laughed. That has nothing to do with anything. And a company can terminate someone's employment for any number of legal reasons and it's not unreasonable that a company, like NPR, wouldn't want to be associated with "edgy" jokes. Especially since it's a non-profit that relies on donations. Though he does use a stagename and wouldn't be connected with them unless someone really looked. People in these comments whining about "being offended" are missing the point, as they usually do with situations, like this. Ultimately, it looks like the judge was on his side so that's really all that matters, I guess.

    stoktuned avatar
    Captain Grump
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Very well put. Agreed that a laughing audience is completely irrelevant. I also found the whole health insurance aspect to be a red herring - it doesn't speak to NPR's position that his activities were detrimental to their image/business/reputation. I think employers need to be kept on a short leash, but at the same time should have some ability to decide that an employee is doing public things that are harmful to the operation.

    Load More Replies...
    ajones_1 avatar
    A Jones
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Jobs should never be policing people's lives outside working hours.

    stoktuned avatar
    Captain Grump
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    While I think the bar should be very high for an employer, it's not unreasonable for them want employees who reflect their image and values. Pretend I own a bookstore, and one of my employees becomes a very publicly active and vocal member of some extremist (but legal) group that alienates a lot of my customers. At some point, I should have the right to protect my business interests. It's a grey area, but I think employers should have some rights in certain cases.

    Load More Replies...
    kevink_1 avatar
    Kevin K
    Community Member
    9 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I once worked for a place that told the employees not to play sports on their days off (in case of injuries) or take part in protest marches.

    mr-garyscott avatar
    El Dee
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Impossible to know who's right without hearing the material. There's a difference between what's legal and what's acceptable. Especially in the US 'freedom of speech' trumps acceptability/hate speech etc. We also know that people DO like racist and sexist jokes and will laugh at them. So I'm completely on the fence on this. He could be completely in the right or completely in the wrong..

    fakeslashdash6 avatar
    Jason Melvil
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Thank you. Was about to say the exact same thing. How can one decide if he is right or wrong - when he never says what the so called joke was?

    Load More Replies...
    heatherphilpot avatar
    Hphizzle
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I’m wondering if the higher ups that fired him in outrage even contacted a lawyer first. Asked if they had any ground to legally fire him. My guess would be that they would have to them to drop it with nothing more than “Don’t use the company name(s) in your sets.”

    nilsskirnir avatar
    Nils Skirnir
    Community Member
    9 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Knowing WHYY and a bit about its board, if OP’d said anything like ‘a two-state solution for Palestine,’ that would have been enough to have them find excuses to fire OP. And sadly, the Iggles doth sucketh.

    guessundheit avatar
    Guess Undheit
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If you're attacking people for who they are, it's bigotry, not "comedy". It's funny how the "freeze peach!" mouths in the commentsl babble about "the freedumb to say what they want", then whine when they face consequences for what they said. Those that say "if you're triggered, go home!" are the most easily triggered. I'll show you: Trump is a typical cisgender heterosexual male. Now watch the emotional infants downvote this comment, even though I'm calling them out and saying nothing insulting.

    glennschroeder avatar
    Papa
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I agree with your first sentence, but some people get offended when they weren't attacked, or get offended on behalf of someone else, when the person or people they're supposedly defending wasn't offended in the first place (which seems to be the case here).

    Load More Replies...
    ksmbuddy10 avatar
    K M
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Don’t some companies sign an agreement promising to not fire you or judge you because of your hobbies outside of work? I may be wrong, feel free to correct me in the replies (I don’t work atm lmao)

    oneand1and1 avatar
    ConservaDave
    Community Member
    8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    NPRs modus operandi has always been "Here's what we think. Now let's cram it down the lister's throat" I used to listen to NPR religiously believing I was getting a nice middle-of-the-road fair opinion, but then I started noticing that their slant is ALWAYS to the left. If they don't like a certain person they will spend way too much energy bashing that person. And I mean daily bashing. Their tunnel vision is disgraceful. They should be called National WAY-LEFT-LEANING Public Radio.

    kkermes avatar
    Kim Kermes
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I am ashamed for WHYY. This is the antithesis of what National Public Radio stands for. The board should have put a stop to this, and as they didn't, should be removed for wasting money primarily collected from listeners, and from the National Endowments for the Arts, which is taxpayer money.

    dinastavola avatar
    BabaBizzle
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I watched his act and he should’ve stuck to his day job.

    oldmanfl01 avatar
    Steve Hall
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    NPR has always wanted everyone to think they are holier than everyone else, they are not.

    marinarocha avatar
    RACM
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Absolutely love this outcome. We need to be very mindful of what a power hungry, addicted to recreational outrage group is attempting to do with an art form. Comedy is theater. This is just ridiculous. Imagining trying to regulate what other people use as an mental outlet and thinking you are right. This is very far from what we want in a society:

    apatheistaccount2 avatar
    Apatheist Account2
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I keep quoting Ricky Gervais: just because you're offended, it doesn't mean you're right. Some people can't tell the difference between a joke about a subject and the subject itself; I had a similar (but much lower-level) experience when I made a comment that everyone but my director realised was satirical (I said something that clearly one shouldn't say, but that was the point of the joke), but I was called in and told off for it (fortunately not sacked like the OP).

    jikoti1046 avatar
    Jikoti
    Community Member
    9 months ago

    This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

    Sickening to see arthbach's comment getting downvoted. I can't even reply to it directly now, the site won't let me. Burn in hell, BP "community".

    Load More Replies...
    create_4beauty avatar
    greenideas
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The morality here is so off: telling an edgy joke is bad but cutting off a veteran's meds is a-ok. Yep, makes sense.

    impossiblekat avatar
    KatSaidWhat
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That. He didn't get fired for the jokes, he got fired because he had a recently diagnosed condition that could impact his employment.

    Load More Replies...
    kraneiathedancingdryad avatar
    Kraneia The Dancing Dryad
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Were they paying for his MS meds? Guarantee that was the real reason they tried to can him. But bad things happen when you fire someone over a medical issue. The standup just gave them a convenient excuse. It backfired because the judge actually looked at the material! 😁

    sonja_6 avatar
    Sonja
    Community Member
    9 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Comedy is always dark and a little problematic. It's the opposite side of drama. You need to be able to laugh about yourself and your flaws to enjoy comedy, especially when it hits home. Comedy is a way to make light of problems and to make the flaws easier visible. It has it's roots with the courts jester, who was the only one who couldn't tell the king the truth and hold him a mirror up by making fun of problems. People nowadays think that means he was allowed to poke the bear and be disparaging against the king, but that wasn't the case. If a jester would have tried that, he'd been killed. He made the king aware of his misdeeds by exaggeration of his degrees, including the negatives. By making fun of people who couldn't pay taxes, for example mimicking them crawling up to the throne and offering the clothes of their back, he pointed out that they have nothing more to give. He'd pretend to saw stones and expect them to grow into turnips to make the king aware his subjects needed seed. Etc.

    guessundheit avatar
    Guess Undheit
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Comedy attacks the powerful, not the weak. Court jesters made light of the king and the halls of power, not the peasantry.

    Load More Replies...
    jppennington avatar
    JayWantsACat
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don't really know how to feel about this. It feels very much the usual right wing grievance post about "MUh fReE sPEeCh", especially that it's conveniently NPR (which is a typical target of the chuds). But I'm almost always pro-labor regardless of how I feel about the company and he names the company itself. It's also weird how he keeps justifying himself because people laughed. That has nothing to do with anything. And a company can terminate someone's employment for any number of legal reasons and it's not unreasonable that a company, like NPR, wouldn't want to be associated with "edgy" jokes. Especially since it's a non-profit that relies on donations. Though he does use a stagename and wouldn't be connected with them unless someone really looked. People in these comments whining about "being offended" are missing the point, as they usually do with situations, like this. Ultimately, it looks like the judge was on his side so that's really all that matters, I guess.

    stoktuned avatar
    Captain Grump
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Very well put. Agreed that a laughing audience is completely irrelevant. I also found the whole health insurance aspect to be a red herring - it doesn't speak to NPR's position that his activities were detrimental to their image/business/reputation. I think employers need to be kept on a short leash, but at the same time should have some ability to decide that an employee is doing public things that are harmful to the operation.

    Load More Replies...
    ajones_1 avatar
    A Jones
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Jobs should never be policing people's lives outside working hours.

    stoktuned avatar
    Captain Grump
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    While I think the bar should be very high for an employer, it's not unreasonable for them want employees who reflect their image and values. Pretend I own a bookstore, and one of my employees becomes a very publicly active and vocal member of some extremist (but legal) group that alienates a lot of my customers. At some point, I should have the right to protect my business interests. It's a grey area, but I think employers should have some rights in certain cases.

    Load More Replies...
    kevink_1 avatar
    Kevin K
    Community Member
    9 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I once worked for a place that told the employees not to play sports on their days off (in case of injuries) or take part in protest marches.

    mr-garyscott avatar
    El Dee
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Impossible to know who's right without hearing the material. There's a difference between what's legal and what's acceptable. Especially in the US 'freedom of speech' trumps acceptability/hate speech etc. We also know that people DO like racist and sexist jokes and will laugh at them. So I'm completely on the fence on this. He could be completely in the right or completely in the wrong..

    fakeslashdash6 avatar
    Jason Melvil
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Thank you. Was about to say the exact same thing. How can one decide if he is right or wrong - when he never says what the so called joke was?

    Load More Replies...
    heatherphilpot avatar
    Hphizzle
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I’m wondering if the higher ups that fired him in outrage even contacted a lawyer first. Asked if they had any ground to legally fire him. My guess would be that they would have to them to drop it with nothing more than “Don’t use the company name(s) in your sets.”

    nilsskirnir avatar
    Nils Skirnir
    Community Member
    9 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Knowing WHYY and a bit about its board, if OP’d said anything like ‘a two-state solution for Palestine,’ that would have been enough to have them find excuses to fire OP. And sadly, the Iggles doth sucketh.

    guessundheit avatar
    Guess Undheit
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If you're attacking people for who they are, it's bigotry, not "comedy". It's funny how the "freeze peach!" mouths in the commentsl babble about "the freedumb to say what they want", then whine when they face consequences for what they said. Those that say "if you're triggered, go home!" are the most easily triggered. I'll show you: Trump is a typical cisgender heterosexual male. Now watch the emotional infants downvote this comment, even though I'm calling them out and saying nothing insulting.

    glennschroeder avatar
    Papa
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I agree with your first sentence, but some people get offended when they weren't attacked, or get offended on behalf of someone else, when the person or people they're supposedly defending wasn't offended in the first place (which seems to be the case here).

    Load More Replies...
    ksmbuddy10 avatar
    K M
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Don’t some companies sign an agreement promising to not fire you or judge you because of your hobbies outside of work? I may be wrong, feel free to correct me in the replies (I don’t work atm lmao)

    oneand1and1 avatar
    ConservaDave
    Community Member
    8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    NPRs modus operandi has always been "Here's what we think. Now let's cram it down the lister's throat" I used to listen to NPR religiously believing I was getting a nice middle-of-the-road fair opinion, but then I started noticing that their slant is ALWAYS to the left. If they don't like a certain person they will spend way too much energy bashing that person. And I mean daily bashing. Their tunnel vision is disgraceful. They should be called National WAY-LEFT-LEANING Public Radio.

    kkermes avatar
    Kim Kermes
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I am ashamed for WHYY. This is the antithesis of what National Public Radio stands for. The board should have put a stop to this, and as they didn't, should be removed for wasting money primarily collected from listeners, and from the National Endowments for the Arts, which is taxpayer money.

    dinastavola avatar
    BabaBizzle
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I watched his act and he should’ve stuck to his day job.

    oldmanfl01 avatar
    Steve Hall
    Community Member
    9 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    NPR has always wanted everyone to think they are holier than everyone else, they are not.

    Related on Bored Panda
    Related on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda