Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

BoredPanda Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Animals That Were Used For Drug Testing Can Now Be Adopted Instead Of Euthanized
User submission
47
3.9K

Animals That Were Used For Drug Testing Can Now Be Adopted Instead Of Euthanized

ADVERTISEMENT

As people are becoming more and more aware of their impact on the environment, many are choosing to alter their actions as well as the products they use and the companies they support. Lately, the masses have looked closer at what brands and big names have products that were created using animal testing. And while the following outrage made many companies change their policies and stop testing on animals, the FDA still requires all drugs in the US to be tested on animals. What’s more gruesome than that, it was also required to euthanize the animals after the tests on them were conducted.

Fortunately, things are changing and now The Food and Drug Administration is rolling out a new policy that allows such animals to escape an unfortunate death. From now on, animals that were used in lab tests and are still healthy may be adopted, sent to shelters, or live out the rest of their days in sanctuaries.

Before the new policy, all animals used in lab tests had to be euthanized

Image credits: pxhere

FDA spokesperson Monique Richards spoke to The Hill to report on the new policy. Turns out, the agency rolled out the new policy back in November of last year. Among the animals whose lives will now be spared are dogs, cats, guinea pigs, and some farm animals.

Image credits: Sarah Leo

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: Orin Zebest

“Yes, all species are covered,” Richards told Green Matters in an interview. “The animal program management, Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and attending veterinarians in each FDA animal program use their professional expertise to decide on eligibility and proper placement.” Unfortunately, the policy only covers animals that are deemed healthy after the testing is done, so any poor animals that are left in a poor state of health would be still euthanized.

Image credits: Stratman²

Image credits: Proggie

The FDA conducts its experiments on animals for a reason. They need to evaluate how safe and efficient drugs, vaccines, various medical devices, and more are. Unfortunately, Cruelty Free International says that animal tests are actually not the most accurate way to measure that. According to CFI’s research, 90% of the drugs tested on animals end up failing on human volunteers.

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: Marv Lynchard

Image credits: Steven M. Ottens

ADVERTISEMENT

As grim as these statistics might seem, the fact that the FDA has rolled out such a policy might be a sign that better days are coming for the poor critters that might become “lab rats.” As animal exploitation becomes a more pressing issue in the eyes of the public, it wouldn’t be surprising if the FDA is steering towards different and more humane alternatives.

Image credits: phip_s

Image credits: Brett McBain

Richards also remarked that the FDA and 13 other federal agencies are involved in the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM), whose goal is to eventually phase out animal testing and replace it with non-animal testing methods as soon as possible.

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: Anssi Koskinen

Image credits: linuxchic

Additionally, legislators are trying to push the AFTER Act in Congress, which would require and help federal agencies to rehome animals that were previously used for experiments.

Image credits: This Year’s Love

Here’s how people reacted to the new policy

ADVERTISEMENT

4Kviews

Share on Facebook
Giedrė Vaičiulaitytė

Giedrė Vaičiulaitytė

Author, Community member

Read more »

As a writer and image editor for Bored Panda, Giedrė crafts posts on many different topics to push them to their potential. She's also glad that her Bachelor’s degree in English Philology didn’t go to waste (although collecting dust in the attic could also be considered an achievement of aesthetic value!) Giedrė is an avid fan of cats, photography, and mysteries, and a keen observer of the Internet culture which is what she is most excited to write about. Since she's embarked on her journalistic endeavor, Giedrė has over 600 articles under her belt and hopes for twice as much (fingers crossed - half of them are about cats).

Read less »
Giedrė Vaičiulaitytė

Giedrė Vaičiulaitytė

Author, Community member

As a writer and image editor for Bored Panda, Giedrė crafts posts on many different topics to push them to their potential. She's also glad that her Bachelor’s degree in English Philology didn’t go to waste (although collecting dust in the attic could also be considered an achievement of aesthetic value!) Giedrė is an avid fan of cats, photography, and mysteries, and a keen observer of the Internet culture which is what she is most excited to write about. Since she's embarked on her journalistic endeavor, Giedrė has over 600 articles under her belt and hopes for twice as much (fingers crossed - half of them are about cats).

What do you think ?
Add photo comments
POST
Sardonic Scribe
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

How about just NOT USE ANIMALS FOR TESTING in the first place?? Disgusting practice!

N G
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I totally agree. If this was banned scientists would find alternative methods, like testing on cell cultures or computational testing. Then when they ate happy they can test it on volunteers.

Load More Replies...
Karmadillo
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Umm....why not do one better and ban animal testing all together? But well done for taking this step forward

Load More Comments
Sardonic Scribe
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

How about just NOT USE ANIMALS FOR TESTING in the first place?? Disgusting practice!

N G
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I totally agree. If this was banned scientists would find alternative methods, like testing on cell cultures or computational testing. Then when they ate happy they can test it on volunteers.

Load More Replies...
Karmadillo
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Umm....why not do one better and ban animal testing all together? But well done for taking this step forward

Load More Comments
You May Like
Related on Bored Panda
Related on Bored Panda
Trending on Bored Panda
Also on Bored Panda