Bwahaha, never even noticed before

Summed up perfectly.

This description is priceless!!!! LMAO

Or the artist who draws Where's Waldo?

The first one is literally a dickface

The little boy on her lap looks so bored

The upper one is lovely

I would be unhappy too if I was trying to sit on the bench and enjoy my alone time and some random guy started hitting on me

I don't know why my comment was down voted? I'm a queer woman myself, queer is a perfectly normal academic word to use (there's queer studies, queer literature studies, queer film studies). Queer is simply an umbrella term like the LGBT, only queer encompasses only sexualities while LGBT encompasses gender identities as well. I'm a queer woman and I'm attracted to women. Michelangelo was a queer man and he was attracted to men. The reason I don't use the word homosexual is because he never specified his sexuality and I don't feel comfortable assigning a specific sexuality for someone unless they have specified it themselves. Hopefully this clears it up for some of you 😊

Manet, after some glasses of wine

Except some of Monet has figures

This comment has been deleted.

Imagine being able to come up with something so simple to execute as this and convincing everyone it is great art worth lots of money.

So... little naked people is Bosch, little clothed people is Bruegel, got it!!!

These descriptions are spot-on. :D

What butts have you seen? These are normal to small sized butts.

Description forgot to add that there must be monkeys present, and shadow mustaches.

Not to mention very long fingers and manicured finger nails.

I knew all of these except for Boucher. And yeah, the writer is accurate. Handy dandy, indeed.

So odd that today nudity is considered obscene and shocking.

Are his paintings always this… Sapphic? (NO complaints from me!!)

Interesting post, though I am not sure I can distinguish the subtlety of Manet's vs. Renoir's partyers, nor the characterization of the people in Bosch vs. Bruegel. I can, of course, recognize a Bruegel, but am less familiar with Bosch.

My Gosh that baby under her leg! I don't know if she kicked it or saving it by clutching it in her legs.

if no one is facing the onlooker/painter in the eye, it's Van Gogh

Tongue in cheek 🤪art history...comedy aside, Art History is a fascinating world to stimulate your neurons with🎨🧠🧐

To the untrained it could be Fragonard.

Or, everyone in the painting is probably gay

I love this style...its so dreamy and beautiful

Except the Caravaggio paintings are not women. They are men!

the winged babies always creep me out. don't understand the ladies who cover their houses with pics of cupids...

Don’t forget ladies in a swing!

Great job, Jonas! Thanks for the read.

True!!! LOL!!!