
Woman Calls Her Partner’s Baby “Hers”, Wants To Name Him, Goes Ballistic When Dad Shuts Her Down
Ah, baby names, a battleground where parents fight tooth and nail over syllables, meanings, and apparently, their ex’s new partner. Between sentimental family names, pop culture influences, and the occasional “this name just feels right” moment, the process is already complicated enough, without throwing new, demanding partners into the mix.
That’s what happened to one Redditor who found himself in a bizarre tug-of-war over his unborn child’s name with his ex-wife’s new partner, who seemed to think she had veto power over their baby’s moniker.
More info: Reddit
Baby names should come with a disclaimer: May cause unnecessary drama, unsolicited opinions, and unfair accusations
Image credits: prostooleh / Freepik (not the actual photo)
One man snapped at his ex-wife’s new partner after she tried to name his baby, calling his child “her baby”
Image credits: wirestock / Freepik (not the actual photo)
The couple split amicably and remained friends, agreeing on the child’s name before the new partner was even in the picture
Image credits: standret / Freepik (not the actual photo)
The ex-wife’s partner got very angry when she heard the baby’s name, telling the man “her” baby would definitely not have that name
Image credits: Throwaway10876543
The man snapped at the ex’s partner, telling her she is not the child’s parent, so she has no say in the name, but was called homophobic for dismissing her wishes
The OP (original poster) and his ex-wife split amicably after she came out. No hard feelings, no dramatic courtroom battles, just 2 people who realized they weren’t meant to be that kind of partners. And the cherry on top? She was pregnant with their baby, and both parents were overjoyed. Until, of course, the name war began.
Before their split, the OP and his ex had settled on the name Samuel Jacob, a sweet tribute to their grandfathers. Nothing controversial, nothing wild. But then came the new partner, who had a bone to pick with the name. Why? Because she once dated a toxic ex named Samantha. Now, tragic as that may be, should that really give her naming right over someone else’s child? The OP didn’t think so.
After explaining (very politely, mind you) that the name had been chosen long before she was in the picture, the partner pulled out the ultimate veto card: “Her child will not be named Samuel.” At this point, the OP’s patience snapped like a raw spaghetti noodle. He made it very clear that she was not the parent, therefore she had zero say in the matter. I must say, I’m with him on this one.
At this point, the partner stormed out, calling the OP homophobic for “reducing her role as a parent due to her sexuality.” The ex-wife, while mildly annoyed at the OP’s bluntness, ultimately agreed that he had the final say. Since then, the OP has been met with mixed reactions from friends, leaving him wondering if he was actually in the wrong.
Image credits: kues1 / Freepik (not the actual photo)
Hey, I get it, dealing with ex-related trauma is never fun, but accusing someone of homophobia, trying to guilt them into giving into your demand is just toxic. Let’s call it what it really is: emotional manipulation in its finest form. The OP wasn’t denying the partner’s role because of her sexuality; he was denying it because, well, she’s not the parent.
But instead of accepting that, she flipped the script, throwing around accusations to guilt the OP into compliance. This is classic emotional manipulation, that sneaky little gremlin that makes people feel bad for things they shouldn’t feel bad about.
Whether it’s twisting words, guilt-tripping, or playing the victim card like their life depends on it, manipulators know exactly how to push buttons, using a sensitive issue to shift blame and force someone into a corner.
If someone tries to control you through guilt, just remember that their feelings are not your responsibility, unless you actually did something wrong—then, yeah, own up to that. Because naming a baby is not a group project. And if OP’s ex’s partner really wants naming rights, she can go ahead and make her own tiny human. Until then, she might want to sit this one out and let the actual parents choose their baby’s name.
Some parents go the sentimental route when naming their babies, opting for names that honor beloved relatives. Others dig deep into pop culture, because what could be better than naming your kid after your favorite wizard or reality TV star?
Then there are the parents who treat naming like a high-stakes creative challenge. But no matter how you choose, one rule remains universal: if you didn’t make the baby, you don’t get to name the baby. Simple as that.
What do you think of this story? Was the dad right to tell his ex’s new partner she has no say in the baby naming process? Drop your thoughts below!
Netizens side with the man, saying he is not the jerk in the story, as his ex’s new partner is manipulative
Poll Question
What do you think is the main reason for the new partner's desire to change the baby’s name?
She wants a say in her partner's life decisions
She is uncomfortable with the name due to her past ex
She genuinely dislikes the name Samuel
She wants to assert more control in the relationship
I agree with the, "New partner only sees you as the s***m donor, not as a parent" comment. OP needs to keep shutting down new partner when she tries to muscle in re: OP's baby.
She will absolutely try to force a wedge between father and son. He needs a contract asap
My read is that the gf feels a rush of power from ending the marriage and being the ex-wife's first same-s*x partner (whether or not thats the truth). She definitely is trying to keep that rush going and wants to muscle out the OP even more.
That's exactly it. She sees the relationship with the ex-wife as a competition.
Who's stopping GF from having another child with Ex? GF makes it sound like this is going to be the only child EVER for this household.
Biology. Failing that, money. They can always pick one up though.
Load More Replies...I agree with the, "New partner only sees you as the s***m donor, not as a parent" comment. OP needs to keep shutting down new partner when she tries to muscle in re: OP's baby.
She will absolutely try to force a wedge between father and son. He needs a contract asap
My read is that the gf feels a rush of power from ending the marriage and being the ex-wife's first same-s*x partner (whether or not thats the truth). She definitely is trying to keep that rush going and wants to muscle out the OP even more.
That's exactly it. She sees the relationship with the ex-wife as a competition.
Who's stopping GF from having another child with Ex? GF makes it sound like this is going to be the only child EVER for this household.
Biology. Failing that, money. They can always pick one up though.
Load More Replies...
38
22