Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

BoredPanda Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Physicists Want To Drill A 5-Kilometer Hole On The Moon, Discussion Online Ensues
37

Physicists Want To Drill A 5-Kilometer Hole On The Moon, Discussion Online Ensues

Interview With Expert
ADVERTISEMENT

The standard model of particle physics says that protons are stable and live forever, yet it has some flaws, especially in uniting quantum mechanics with Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which describes gravity. 

The proton decay hypothesis was first described by Andrei Sakharov in 1967, yet despite experimental efforts, all the ways to find evidence on Earth have failed. Therefore, Patrick Stengel from the National Institute of Nuclear Physics in Ferrara, Italy, and his colleagues are proposing digging a 5-kilometer-deep hole into the Moon to search for signs of ancient protons decaying into kaons.

Patrick Stengel from the National Institute of Nuclear Physics in Ferrara, Italy, is proposing digging deep into the moon to search for signs of ancient protons decaying into kaons

Image credits: International Space Station

Image credits: ESA

Image credits: NASA

Image credits: NASA

Stengel believes that the lunar rock could hold the evidence of such decay in chemical changes in its mineral structure. Hiding deep down in the Moon’s surface would create a protective shield and would also mean that such evidence wouldn’t be mixed up with look-alike reactions caused by things like high-energy neutrinos.

ADVERTISEMENT

After their calculations, the scientific team found out that the shielding would only be sufficient at least 5 kilometers under the lunar surface. In this case, a powerful drill would have to be transported to the moon to be able to obtain the sample. What’s important to mention is that drills can go much deeper than that on Earth; for example, the Kola Superdeep Borehole in Russia goes down more than 12 kilometres.

Image credits: @daryavaseum

Image credits: @daryavaseum

“Fundamentally, the idea is appealing,” said David Waters, Professor of Physics at University College London. “Instead of having detectors that weigh thousands of tonnes and operating them for a few years, you look at small mineral samples, perhaps only tens or hundreds of grams, and they might have been recording in their structure particle interactions over hundreds of millions of years.”

Yet the rock sample would have to be analyzed on the Moon with advanced microscopy equipment, since transporting the sample to Earth could affect it with cosmic rays. “The idea is very speculative. You need to go to 5 kilometers depth, pull out moon rocks and use these cutting-edge microscopy techniques – all that’s very hard,” Stengel shared his thoughts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite all the technical difficulties, having access to just 100 grams of lunar rock could be enough to find the evidence of proton decay with as much or even more sensitivity than projects on Earth, such as the Super-Kamiokande neutrino detection experiment in Japan. This research experiment, together with about 40 universities and research institutes around the world, is aiming to elucidate the mystery of the universe and matter through neutrino observation.

Lunar rock samples from the Moon’s depths could give an opportunity to see if protons can decay into something else

Image credits: International Space Station

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: NASA

Image credits: ESA

Our physical exploration of the Moon started in 1959 with Luna 2, a space probe that was launched by the Soviet Union. Before that, the only available exploration had been done only with the observations made from Earth.

Galileo Galilei is considered the first person who used a telescope for astronomical purposes. He made his own telescope in 1609 and the lunar surface was among his first observations using it.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nowadays, due to quickly developing technology, there are lots of people taking detailed photos of the Moon’s surface, yet photographer Darya Kawa Mirza, better known as @daryavaseum on social media, is definitely among the best known.

The 30-year-old astrophotographer lives in Erbil, the capital city of Kurdistan region in Iraq.

“I was obsessed with photography since I was a kid and got my first camera. I start shooting everything: moon, landscapes… Until in 2007 my dad bought me a digital camera,” Darya shared in the interview with Bored Panda.

“Day after day I was learning all the basics and important stuff related to the camera and after a few years, my knowledge expanded so much that in 2014 I bought more advanced photo equipment,” the astrophotographer shared.

Asked about how he started taking such detailed photos of the moon, Darya told us that it happened quite accidentally. “I’ve always been curious about the sky but the turning point was when I discovered telescopes. I ordered a small one for myself and that was how it all started,” he said.

Darya told us that the entire process of taking photos can take from a few hours to several days. “For instance, my latest moon image took me 4 days of continuous shooting,” he explained. 

“The Moon has always been special to me and not only because it can be really challenging to take photos sometimes, but also because through my photography I am able to bring it closer to all those people who share the same deep love to the brightest and largest object in our night sky,” Darya said and mentioned that in the future, he would also like capture Saturn and Jupiter.

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: @daryavaseum

Image credits: @daryavaseum

Image credits: @daryavaseum

As ESA’s Director of Technology, Engineering and Quality Franco Ongaro beautifully puts it, “If space is an ocean, then the Moon is our nearest island,” the one that humans last visited in 1972 with the 17th Apollo mission. 

And who knows, maybe the next crewed mission to the Moon will find the evidence about protons’ decay into something else and will finally solve the conflict between physics theories that we have had over the decades. 

People on the internet shared their excitement about new possible discoveries on the Moon

ADVERTISEMENT
Poll icon

Poll Question

Thanks! Check out the results:

Share on Facebook
Eglė Tenikytė

Eglė Tenikytė

Author, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

Photographer and creative content creator with 10 years of experience, currently living in Portugal, inspired by the ocean and with a huge passion for classic sports cars 🏎🏁🌊✨

Read less »
Eglė Tenikytė

Eglė Tenikytė

Author, BoredPanda staff

Photographer and creative content creator with 10 years of experience, currently living in Portugal, inspired by the ocean and with a huge passion for classic sports cars 🏎🏁🌊✨

What do you think?
Add photo comments
POST
tymej007 avatar
Justin Tyme
Community Member
6 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Wouldn't that cause the moon to deflate and fall out of the sky?

mikefitzpatrick avatar
Mike F
Community Member
6 days ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Can't we spend that time/money/energy figuring out how to house, feed and get clean water to people here? Suppose all the $ necessary to make this happen is raised and it comes to fruition, then what? A hearty oh, cool, that's what I thought, and there's more junk on the lunar surface that cost enough money to house hundreds, perhaps thousands of people. The whole idea is foolish imo.

lynnie_quek avatar
Lame Llama
Community Member
6 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This shouldn't be "either or". With your attitude, there would never be advancement in Science, nor medicine, nor anything else beyond basic necessity. Your opinion is narrow-minded and foolish imo.

Load More Replies...
coreypichler avatar
CP
Community Member
6 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

They need to train oil drillers to be astronauts!

dhoppe2001 avatar
DH41144
Community Member
6 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

They did that once before - seemed to work out, although a few never made it back to earth

Load More Replies...
Load More Comments
tymej007 avatar
Justin Tyme
Community Member
6 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Wouldn't that cause the moon to deflate and fall out of the sky?

mikefitzpatrick avatar
Mike F
Community Member
6 days ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Can't we spend that time/money/energy figuring out how to house, feed and get clean water to people here? Suppose all the $ necessary to make this happen is raised and it comes to fruition, then what? A hearty oh, cool, that's what I thought, and there's more junk on the lunar surface that cost enough money to house hundreds, perhaps thousands of people. The whole idea is foolish imo.

lynnie_quek avatar
Lame Llama
Community Member
6 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This shouldn't be "either or". With your attitude, there would never be advancement in Science, nor medicine, nor anything else beyond basic necessity. Your opinion is narrow-minded and foolish imo.

Load More Replies...
coreypichler avatar
CP
Community Member
6 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

They need to train oil drillers to be astronauts!

dhoppe2001 avatar
DH41144
Community Member
6 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

They did that once before - seemed to work out, although a few never made it back to earth

Load More Replies...
Load More Comments
Related on Bored Panda
Related on Bored Panda
Trending on Bored Panda
Also on Bored Panda