Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Twitter User Explains How Defunding The Police Turned Out To Be A Good Idea In The Past
User submission
1.7K
14.1K

Twitter User Explains How Defunding The Police Turned Out To Be A Good Idea In The Past

Turns Out, Defunding The Police Worked In The 60s And Saved Hundreds Of LivesTwitter User Explains How Defunding The Police Turned Out To Be A Good Idea In The PastTurns Out, Defunding The Police Worked In The 60s And Americans Are Still Benefiting From ItTwitter User Explains Why Defunding The Police Won't Lead To Anarchy, Gives An Example From Historic Events Back In The 60sTurns Out, Defunding The Police Worked In The 60s And It Helped To Create Efficient Ambulance ServicesTwitter User Explains How Defunding The Police Turned Out To Be A Good Idea In The PastTwitter User Explains How Defunding The Police Turned Out To Be A Good Idea In The PastTwitter User Explains How Defunding The Police Turned Out To Be A Good Idea In The PastTwitter User Explains How Defunding The Police Turned Out To Be A Good Idea In The PastTwitter User Explains How Defunding The Police Turned Out To Be A Good Idea In The Past
ADVERTISEMENT

The worldwide protests following the death of George Floyd made many of us realized that law enforcement is in great need of reform. While people have been marching to end systematic racism and police brutality for a long time, now the activists are much bolder in their demands for change to happen. One of the suggestions which have been met with controversy is defunding the police.

Every year, both state and local governments spend 100 billion dollars on law enforcement. So why not cut some of that money and spend it on a variety of helpful services that would support the community? While to some it seems like a brilliant idea that could decrease both poverty and crime, there are also those who are strictly against it. A writer Jamie Ford has an explanation of why he thinks people disagree with defunding the police. It’s because “they’re not understanding that change rarely happens from within”, he writes.

More info: twitter.com | Instagram

RELATED:

    Writer Jamie Ford decided to share how Americans are benefiting of defunded police years after it happened in the 60s

    Image credits: JamieFord

    Instead of offering complex arguments in favor of the cause, Ford decided to prove that Americans are already benefiting from defunded police by reminding of some historical events.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: JamieFord

    Image credits: JamieFord

    Image credits: JamieFord

    Image credits: JamieFord

    Image credits: JamieFord

    Image credits: JamieFord

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: JamieFord

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: JamieFord

    For those who are unfamiliar with this part of history, Ford recommends watching Freedom House documentary. Here’s the trailer

    Here’s how people reacted to Ford’s history lesson

    Image credits: MarkAvo

    Image credits: FFCade

    Image credits: KEshleman

    Image credits: octosharks

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: StarvingHarvest

    Image credits: PurpleHeartSnek

    Image credits: schakestuff

    Image credits: RottenPk

    Image credits: not_skeletor

    14Kviews

    Share on Facebook
    Andželika

    Andželika

    Author, Community member

    Read more »

    This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

    Read less »
    Andželika

    Andželika

    Author, Community member

    This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

    What do you think ?
    Add photo comments
    POST
    WilvanderHeijden
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Yes, the total misconception that defunding the police will turn the US into a lawless nation is very strong and understandable. How could a nation do with a police force that isn't equipped with tanks, armoured personel vehicles, teargas, batons, shields and rubberbullets? Just look at the UK. There are many police officers there that don't even have guns and the crime index is even less than in the US but the security index is much higher. And when you look at other countries where the police is armed but have a better POLICE-training you'll notice that their crime index is only half of the US crime index. So perhaps the US should be looking at investing more money in training and education and much less in military stuff to oppress the people.

    Carrie de Luka
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Absolutely. Training in the UK for police is 2 years (with a degree) and 3 years without and then 2 years probation/on the job training. So that is 4 or 5 years before they can call themselves a police officer.

    Load More Replies...
    Liam Walsh
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    They actually wrote PADDY WAGON on the sides of these vehicles???? Good Grief.

    TA B
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Maybe I don't get it, it just sounds like the distribution of assets and them investing in more practical services. Not defunding.

    Lucas
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Less money for the police because it woud be spent on education, mental health, housing, poverty issues etc. So, yeah, you get it. 👍

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    WilvanderHeijden
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Yes, the total misconception that defunding the police will turn the US into a lawless nation is very strong and understandable. How could a nation do with a police force that isn't equipped with tanks, armoured personel vehicles, teargas, batons, shields and rubberbullets? Just look at the UK. There are many police officers there that don't even have guns and the crime index is even less than in the US but the security index is much higher. And when you look at other countries where the police is armed but have a better POLICE-training you'll notice that their crime index is only half of the US crime index. So perhaps the US should be looking at investing more money in training and education and much less in military stuff to oppress the people.

    Carrie de Luka
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Absolutely. Training in the UK for police is 2 years (with a degree) and 3 years without and then 2 years probation/on the job training. So that is 4 or 5 years before they can call themselves a police officer.

    Load More Replies...
    Liam Walsh
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    They actually wrote PADDY WAGON on the sides of these vehicles???? Good Grief.

    TA B
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Maybe I don't get it, it just sounds like the distribution of assets and them investing in more practical services. Not defunding.

    Lucas
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Less money for the police because it woud be spent on education, mental health, housing, poverty issues etc. So, yeah, you get it. 👍

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    Related on Bored Panda
    Related on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda