Everybody loves Disney, but let's face it, while the characters are often lovable, they're rarely representative of reality. I'm not just talking about singing lobsters or talking mice. I'm talking about the human characters and their unnaturally trim figures. We never see them working out, but Ariel, Rapunzel, Belle and Cinderella must hit the gym pretty hard to maintain such lean physiques.
As you can see from these curvacious pinups however, Melbourne-based artist Ashley Beevers has decided to add some voluptuous volume to some of Disney's most beloved female leads. Her racey reimaginings give us a whole new perspective on some of Walt's most iconic women, and if you want to add them to your bedroom wall or the inside of your locker then head on over to her Etsy page and buy yourself some prints.
More info: Etsy
This post may include affiliate links.
Belle
Ariel
Ursula
Tiana
Rapunzel
Merida
Snow White
Tinker Bell
If disney characters are "rarely representative of reality" so are these. Even though I am not sure if that was the artists's purpose, or it is just the text that says so. But: why is any single one extensively tattooed?
Well, probably the artist simply likes tatoos. :P It's her decision what to draw and in which way.
Load More Replies...I'm having a bit of an issue with people drawing curvy women with ultra smooth curves. They're soft rolls and dimples (tight dimples you know, aka cellulite, but that's such an ugly word), not tight balloons.
I must admit I don't like them. Women don't have to be skinny but that I don't call beautiful either. Curvy fine but not fat.
This as an artistic expression is fine. Sheryl, what you find attractive is personal and people should not be judged overall on yours or anybody else's standards. My problem with this is that it takes a step forward in diversity but ultimately it is still objectifying women as sexual objects. It still looking at things through the "male" gaze of what or what is not attractive.
Load More Replies...If disney characters are "rarely representative of reality" so are these. Even though I am not sure if that was the artists's purpose, or it is just the text that says so. But: why is any single one extensively tattooed?
Well, probably the artist simply likes tatoos. :P It's her decision what to draw and in which way.
Load More Replies...I'm having a bit of an issue with people drawing curvy women with ultra smooth curves. They're soft rolls and dimples (tight dimples you know, aka cellulite, but that's such an ugly word), not tight balloons.
I must admit I don't like them. Women don't have to be skinny but that I don't call beautiful either. Curvy fine but not fat.
This as an artistic expression is fine. Sheryl, what you find attractive is personal and people should not be judged overall on yours or anybody else's standards. My problem with this is that it takes a step forward in diversity but ultimately it is still objectifying women as sexual objects. It still looking at things through the "male" gaze of what or what is not attractive.
Load More Replies...