Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

BoredPanda Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

“Where’s The Law?”: Squatters Sue Couple After “Breaking Into” Their NY Home
198

“Where’s The Law?”: Squatters Sue Couple After “Breaking Into” Their NY Home

ADVERTISEMENT

A couple is being sued by alleged squatters who they say unlawfully occupied their $930,000 duplex in Jamaica, Queens, New York.

The suit has led Juliya Fulman and her husband, Denis Kurlyand, to spend over $4,000 in legal bills, the New York Post reports.

“You can’t really even blame them in a way because it’s handed to them on a silver platter,” Kurlyand said of the “opportunists.” 

Highlights
  • Homeowners in Queens, NY, were sued by alleged squatters after their $930,000 home was occupied.
  • Juliya Fulman and Denis Kurlyand have so far spent over $4,000 in legal bills.
  • The alleged squatters utilized NY laws offering protections after 30+ days of occupancy.

“Something needs to be done because the issue is getting worse. People are taking advantage of these laws, manipulating the laws, and our hands are tied,” he added.

The invaders’ actions are reportedly in accordance with New York laws, which allow squatters to access a number of legal protections after they have occupied a property for more than 30 days.

You May Also Like:

Image credits: https://www.instagram.com/julie_julz4/

The couple spent $530,000 on renovating the Lakeside Avenue investment property. They had also found tenants for both rental units. However, on March 5, their real estate broker, Ejona Bardhi, noticed that the locks on the duplex had been changed.

When Bardhi approached the property, she saw the silhouette of a man wearing a hooded sweatshirt and holding a drill.

ADVERTISEMENT

The broker proceeded to call the police and the homeowners to alert them of the situation. During that time, she says she was surrounded by several men who had emerged from the property.

“They were trying to intimidate me,” she said. “It was bizarre.”

When police arrived, the men—identified by the Dailymail as Lance Hunt Sr. and Rondie L. Francis—claimed it was their property, and they had been living there since January. After being asked to provide evidence for their claims, the men said they were YouTubers and left without incident.

For Bardhi, the only solution for this situation was to change the locks again. Only she was warned that the homeowners could get arrested if they did.

“What did we do? Nothing. We put up a property for rent, and that’s it; now we’re dealing with a nightmare,” Kurlyand said.

The men returned shortly afterward, only to be escorted away by police after the owners provided evidence of ownership documents and timestamped videos showing the house had been vacant.

Despite the warning from the police, the homeowners went on to change the locks on the property.

The homeowners were told that they’d get sued if they changed the locks on their property

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: https://www.instagram.com/julie_julz4/

Ten days later, Bardhi received a court order saying the alleged squatters were suing her, the homeowners, and the company handling the site, Top Nest Properties.

The men were granted an emergency lockout hearing on March 22 in Queens Civil Court, during which the couple’s lawyer, Rizpah Morrow, asked Judge Vijay Kitson for a trial, arguing that the men had “perpetrated a fraud,” as per The New York Post.

According to Kurlyand, the men showed up to court with “forged documents” alleging they had legally occupied the property.

“They found whatever they could and threw it all together. The lease they presented is ridiculous; signed on January 1 and starting January 1,” he described.

“Somebody broke into my house, and I’m in court getting sued by them. How can we be here? How is this possible? There have to be safety precautions in place.”

The next scheduled court date is set to take place on April 5. The couple’s tenants haven’t been able to move in yet.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It could take years to evict someone who illegally broke into your house? Where’s the law in that? Why work hard to pay rent or mortgages when you can break into somebody’s house every couple of years and have luxury living?” Kurlyand added.

“As in any courtroom, you never know which way it’s going to go. It’s scary if the judge decides for whatever reason to rule against us that day. Even if we have evidence, there’s nothing we can do at the end of the day; we still have to fight in court.”

People said that the laws need to be less permissive when it comes to squatters

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Share on Facebook
Marina Urman

Marina Urman

Writer, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

Marina is a journalist at Bored Panda. Born in Buenos Aires, Argentina, she holds a Bachelor of Social Science. In her spare time, you can find her baking, reading, or binge-watching a docuseries. Her main areas of interest are pop culture, literature, and education.

Read less »
Marina Urman

Marina Urman

Writer, BoredPanda staff

Marina is a journalist at Bored Panda. Born in Buenos Aires, Argentina, she holds a Bachelor of Social Science. In her spare time, you can find her baking, reading, or binge-watching a docuseries. Her main areas of interest are pop culture, literature, and education.

Ugnė Lazauskaitė

Ugnė Lazauskaitė

Author, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

I am employed as a Visual Editor in the news team. I make sure you have the best pictures near the most interesting text. In general all day I am looking at all you favourite celebrities facies and I am geting payed for it!

Read less »

Ugnė Lazauskaitė

Ugnė Lazauskaitė

Author, BoredPanda staff

I am employed as a Visual Editor in the news team. I make sure you have the best pictures near the most interesting text. In general all day I am looking at all you favourite celebrities facies and I am geting payed for it!

What do you think ?
Add photo comments
POST
Id row
Community Member
7 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Florida has just signed an anti-squatters law, which I can't believe isn't a thing everywhere. How is stealing someone's property not grand theft? Can you steal a car and claim driver's rights? I can't comprehend why squatters get rewarded for grand theft.

Petra
Community Member
7 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Squatters' Rights has always seemed insane to me. It's like if you break the law for long enough, your breaking of the law becomes protected by the law. It'd be like outlawing 1 murder, but if you commit 5 murders, the law protects you. Squatters are criminals, just like mass shooters and serial killers are criminals. They should be treated as such!

Petra
Community Member
7 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Squatter should be charged with breaking & entering and trespassing for every day they occupy the building. And charge with property damage if they change the locks or make any other unauthorized adjustment to the building. And fraud if they forge papers. And providing a false statement if they lie to the police/courts (ex. in this case, about being the owners).

Load More Replies...
Load More Comments
Id row
Community Member
7 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Florida has just signed an anti-squatters law, which I can't believe isn't a thing everywhere. How is stealing someone's property not grand theft? Can you steal a car and claim driver's rights? I can't comprehend why squatters get rewarded for grand theft.

Petra
Community Member
7 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Squatters' Rights has always seemed insane to me. It's like if you break the law for long enough, your breaking of the law becomes protected by the law. It'd be like outlawing 1 murder, but if you commit 5 murders, the law protects you. Squatters are criminals, just like mass shooters and serial killers are criminals. They should be treated as such!

Petra
Community Member
7 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Squatter should be charged with breaking & entering and trespassing for every day they occupy the building. And charge with property damage if they change the locks or make any other unauthorized adjustment to the building. And fraud if they forge papers. And providing a false statement if they lie to the police/courts (ex. in this case, about being the owners).

Load More Replies...
Load More Comments
You May Like
Related on Bored Panda
Related on Bored Panda
Trending on Bored Panda
Also on Bored Panda