ADVERTISEMENT

Those who are insecure often project their supposed superiority in a variety of ways. One of the most popular ones is pointing out others' mistakes. However, sometimes the fact-checkers rely too much on their emotions and too little on the truth.

There's a Facebook group called 'People Incorrectly Correcting Other People' and it's full of humorous reminders that you need to be absolutely certain of what you're about to say when you're getting ready to bask someone, or else you're going to make a fool of yourself.

From folks who can't tell the time to grammar gurus stumbling on their own words, here are some of the most popular recent posts that were shared by the online community.

#1

Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

David Fudge Report

RELATED:

    When people disagree on an issue, there are several possible routes they can take. Some might avoid it altogether (either by putting off the discussion or just agreeing with the other person in order to end the conversation). But, as you see in the pictures, it's not for everyone — others believe they need to actively resolve the matter. 

    In that case, they have a choice between being competitive or cooperative.

    "Cooperative resolution means that people are seeking some kind of middle ground," explains Art Markman, Ph.D., and Annabel Irion Worsham Centennial Professor of Psychology and Marketing at the University of Texas at Austin. "Competitive resolution means that people are trying to convince the other person to change their belief."

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Many factors lead people to take a cooperative or competitive stance when dealing with a disagreement. For instance, the personality characteristic of openness reflects how willing we are to consider new ideas, and people high in openness are more likely to be cooperative than those who are low in openness. 

    The characteristic of agreeableness reflects how much people want to get along with others — agreeable people are also more likely to seek a compromise than disagreeable people.

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Markman also suggests a paper by Kimberly Rios, Kenneth DeMarree, and Johnathan Statzer in the July 2014 issue of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin to better understand what affects our tendency to be cooperative or competitive.

    Turns out, people's certainty about their beliefs can be broken down into two components: clarity and correctness. Clarity determines if we are sure about what we believe. Each of us has some beliefs that we hold deeply and others to which we are not as firmly attached. Correctness focuses on whether we think our belief is 'correct' in some broader cultural context or not.

    The authors suggested that the more strongly people believe their attitude is correct, the more competitive they will be in their discussions with others. (Interestingly, they did not assume that clarity would be as strongly related to competitiveness.)

    #11

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Wee Yew Ong Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    Hawkmoon
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This kind of person would rather carry a ton of feathers than ten kilograms of iron.

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu
    #12

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Jadelou Gesulga Yarte Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    Francis
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    yeah and that's why we explored so much of antarctica back then... wait no we didn't..

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu
    ADVERTISEMENT

    "Being certain of your attitude can affect whether you try to convince other people that you are right," Markman writes. "In particular, the more strongly you believe that your attitude is the right one, the more you will focus on convincing others."

    "That also means that if you find yourself in conflict with others on a regular basis, you might want to evaluate whether you generally assume that your attitudes are the correct ones."

    #14

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Pavel Chichikov Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    Hawkmoon
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It always reminds me of the legend of the inventor of the game of chess who just asked for a grain of wheat on one square, then two on the next, four on the next, etc.

    Julian Gerretsen
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This equates to 18,446,744,073,709,600,000 grains of rice (Eighteen Quintillion Four Hundred Forty-Six Quadrillion grains of rice) 1kg of rice holds approximately 15,432 grains of rice. 1 metric ton of rice is 1kg X 1000. rice / 15,432 / 1000 = number of tons We therefore have 1,195,356,666,259 (One Trillion Two Hundred Billion roughly) Rice is approximately $620 currently per metric ton. Hence, if you used the chessboard example, you'd have around around $741,121,133,080,607. That's about 740.12 Trillion Dollars, about 22.45 X the current USA national debt. That's a lot of rice/money. In volume, there are baout 43 million grains of rice in a cubic metre. Our rice windfall would therefore fill a cubic box measuring 7.5 km square on all sides. That's a big a$$ box of rice....

    Load More Replies...
    carne asada
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    ok so i did calculations (correct me if im wrong) but folding a paper 42 times theoretically means it is equivalent to 4.3980465e+12 (idk what number that is) pieces of paper stacked on top of each other. The average stack of copy paper sold consists of 500 pieces, equaling 1.875 inches in height. If you divide 4.3980465e+12 by 500 to get the number of stacks of paper, you get 8796093022.21 stacks. If you multiply this by 1.875 for the height of the stacks you get 16492674416.6 inches. this is equivalent to 260301.048242 miles (418913.9301819732 km). the moon is 238,900 miles (384472.282 km) away from earth. This theory has just been proven, your welcome. again i may be wrong but im only 14

    AgingBull
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Might require the same amount of energy to fold it 42 times as getting to the Moon

    Tabitha
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    There comes a point, at about 7 or 8 folds, where you can’t fold a sheet of paper “in half” anymore, no matter how big a sheet it is. Yes, you can fold it in parts, or in pleats way more times, but but if you’re talking about in half then in half again, you’re done at 7 or 8 folds.

    Celesta
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    They did thos on Mythbusters, using a sheet almost as latge as a hanger and still barely cracked 11 folds and that was with heavy machinery.

    Load More Replies...
    Stephen Smith
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    fold paper once =2 fold it again =4 again =8 so it's not 42 sheets of paper. it will workout to 4,398,046,511,104 sheets of paper , wont get you to the moon, but you may find it difficult to breath if you stand on top.

    Stephen Smith
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I've been thinking more about this. First we all know it's almost impossible to fold a paper more than 7 times. So let's pretend we can, or the best way to get the same result would be to stack the correct number of A4 sheets, which would be 4,398,046,511,104 sheets. The 80gsm thickness per sheet is 0.1mm, that times by 4,398,046,511,104 = 439,805 Km. The average distance to the moon is 384,400Km, so yes you can reach the moon. But there is something else to thick about, the best price I can find on A4 paper is £313.15 for 25,000 sheets. If you work out the cost it is £55,089,930,598.09 It would cost less to build your own rocket. Or just wait to book a holiday to the moon on SpaceX spaceship. BTW the surface area of all that paper is 274,306.16 SqKm that's more than the surface area of the UK.

    Load More Replies...
    thea
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    call me stupid but I don't get it how does folded paper reach the moon doesn't it get smaller

    thea
    Community Member
    11 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I honestly don't get how folded paper can reach the moon. Doesn't paper get smaller when folded? Correct me if I'm wrong I don't get this kind of stuff😭

    Dwayne Gruber
    Community Member
    1 year ago

    This comment has been deleted.

    Julian Gerretsen
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    An average piece of paper is roughly speaking, about 0.1mm thick. Whilst it's not physically possible to fold it in half more than about 7 or 8 times (try it yourself with a sheet of paper, results may vary with paper make-up!!!), let's pretend that this is possible. See the attached EXCEL snapshot to see how few times you need to fold the paper to reach the moon.... EXCEL_zFFS...ba3209.png EXCEL_zFFS354krI-6546453ba3209.png

    Julian Gerretsen
    Community Member
    1 year ago

    This comment has been deleted.

    Amy
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The only thing I'd say in Red's defense is that Blue didn't specify fold *in half*.

    hyperfixationACTIVATED
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The person who said the first thing has been on neal.fun (there's a game on there in which your fold paper until it reaches the moon)

    Gustav Gallifrey
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    In 2001, high school student Britney Gallivan of Pomona, California, successfully managed to fold a paper in half 12 times by using a roll of long, thin specialty toilet paper that was 1.2 kilometers in length. The resulting 'pile' of paper did not reach to around a third of the distance to the Moon.

    Remi (He/Him)
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    12 times folded isn't ⅓ the height of 42 times folded. 13 times would be x2 of the 12 times, 14 times x4 etc. How ever high the 12 times folded was, the 42 times would be that times 2³⁶ which is something like 69 billion

    Load More Replies...
    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu

    Manners mentor Maralee McKee finds it sad that sometimes, when people speak, their words seem more spit out than thought out. 

    ADVERTISEMENT

    "Stories abound, and it has happened to me, about being called out in person in front of family members, coworkers, friends, and anybody and everybody else for minor things, from incorrectly quoting a movie line, to saying something happened on a Tuesday when it occurred on a Wednesday, to getting the name wrong of the restaurant an incident occurred in while telling a great story," she says.

    #20

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Michael Davidson Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    lily jones
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    But even if you're skinny your weight is still distributed fairly evenly around your body

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu

    According to McKee, even if the 'correctors,' 'nit-pickers,' and 'accusers' are right, correcting others over small things is rarely called for, it seldom wins anyone friends, and on the rare occasion when it is called for, it's tricky to accomplish politely.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    For more people incorrectly correcting other people, fire up our older publications on the Facebook group, called 50 People That Had More Courage Than Brains To Go Incorrectly Correcting Someone and 45 Painfully Cringe Moments When People Thought They Knew Better, But Embarrassed Themselves Instead.

    #26

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Laura Arlette Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    Hawkmoon
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Abracadabra is the term used in many european countries. It's origin is "adhadda kedhabhra", from aramean langage, meaning "destroy this thing". And if this reminds you of another magic formula in some books and movies, that's not a coincidence.

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu
    ADVERTISEMENT
    #28

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Josh Christler Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    DforDory
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I like the fact how I started thinking about what was the real intention - mercilessly or unmercilessly, rather than questioning the reason of the beating. It's like politics, you get distracted do easily from the main subject. 🥴

    View more commentsArrow down menu
    #30

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Mark Chant Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    Lexekon
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Which is correct sulphur or sulfur? Sulfur has been the preferred spelling of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) since 1990, and is the default form employed by many scientific journals 1. The alternative spelling sulphur may still be found in common use in the UK and Commonwealth, especially by laypeople.Mar 15, 2019

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu
    #32

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Wayne Kitching Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    censorshipsucks
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    four is germanic. Colour is latin. The "u" was artificially introduced to make consistency with french spelling (french descends from latin). Original old english for four was "feower".

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu
    #33

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Imogen Leaf Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    censorshipsucks
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I use these differently even though we supposedly use UK english here. I use mold for the fungus and mould for shaping-something (verb or noun). I do the same with disc/disk and program/programme. I use disc = a circle, disk = a computer disk; and program = verb, to make a computer do something; programme = series of in-person/person-attended events , e.g. wedding programme.

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu
    #34

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Sanne Spring Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    Did I say that out loud? (he/him)cis/het
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This one shouldn't be here. It's simply the difference between British English and American English. Both are correct ,it simply depends on which English you use.

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu
    #35

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Jaclyn Jarvis Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    Corvus
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Betelgeuse is also the name of a star... still pronounced like Beetlejuice.

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu
    ADVERTISEMENT
    #41

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Evan Bieszke Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    BlueBlazer999
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    “Spelling and Grammar” would be replaced by the pronoun they, meaning are is perfectly valid.

    View more commentsArrow down menu
    ADVERTISEMENT
    See Also on Bored Panda
    Continue reading with Bored Panda Premium
    Unlimited content
    Ad-free browsing
    Dark mode
    #46

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Marc McWhinnie Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    Stardust she/her
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Reminds me of the time I saw a YouTube skit where someone doesn’t have pronouns at all. They’re referred to only by name and nothing else

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu
    #47

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Heather Staines Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    Libstak
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Oh look fellow Aussies, we've taken New Zealand in a bloodless war at some point and nobody even raised a news alert.

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu
    ADVERTISEMENT
    See Also on Bored Panda
    #55

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Michael Davidson Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    Gustav Gallifrey
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That's not Drew Wrong. I went to school with Drew Wrong, and it looks nothing like him.

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu
    ADVERTISEMENT
    See Also on Bored Panda
    #62

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Michael Jamo Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    #64

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Michael Davidson Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    VonBlade
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Yeah The House of the Rising Sun definitely isn't an Animals original.

    #65

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Cat Pearce Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    Anna Stephenson
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I was expecting another reply like "My Dear, it's "dear" not "deer"

    #67

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Ryan Pearson Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    Kelly H. Wilder
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This one doesn't fit the theme, but it is funny anyway. 😁 (Edit: retrieving)

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu
    ADVERTISEMENT
    See Also on Bored Panda
    #69

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Kimi Koster Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    Cathy McGee
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The english is from Nether as in low or under. Meaning the Low lands.

    View more commentsArrow down menu
    #70

    Correcting-Other-People-Incorrectly

    Adam Zaghlul Report

    Add photo comments
    POST