Person Boarding A Plane Finds Out Their Colleague Is Searching For Them At Their Home
A person’s address is a sensitive piece of personal information. In the UK, it’s protected under the Data Protection Law 2018, meaning that workplaces can’t just share it with anyone they like. It’s understandable. After all, hardly any of us would like to have someone coming unannounced and lurking around our home.
Unfortunately, some managers think work and schedules trump everything. Like the one in this story. She had the gall to send an employee to their coworker’s house to check on them because they hadn’t been replying to emails. Appalled that employers abuse their power in such ways, the person decided to share their story with others.
Most people probably wouldn’t like someone showing up to their house unannounced
Image credits: Samuel Peter / pexels (not the actual photo)
This person’s manager decided to send another colleague to their house to check up on them, not realizing how inappropriate this might be
Image credits: Taryn Elliott / pexels (not the actual photo)
Image source: unexistinguniverse
If an employer leaks your personal data, you can sue for financial losses or emotional distress
Image credits: Sora Shimazaki / pexels (not the actual photo)
When we sign an employment contract, we give our new employer some personal information. Name, phone number, banking details, address – these are all included under the definition of ‘personal data.’ An employer cannot share their employees’ personal information without consent or a lawful basis.
The first one is clear – you have to agree to your address being given out to someone else. But what does ‘lawful basis’ actually mean? It may be that the employer needs to follow a legal obligation and needs to give your address to the authorities, for example.
But if there is no lawful basis for an employer to give out an employee’s address, that’s a potential breach of the Data Protection Act. Many commenters already suggested that the author should speak with an attorney. And while that may be the best way to get justice, it might not be easy.
People whose private data was leaked by an employer can claim emotional damage or financial losses. In this author’s case, they probably would be able to file a claim to compensate for emotional distress.
“The wrong people having access to your personal information can cause a lot of emotional distress, which can have very real consequences for your life,” Hayes Connors Solicitors writes. “Common issues people experience following a breach of data in the workplace include difficulty sleeping, feeling ill, being unsettled and experiencing significant stress.”
Employees need to communicate clearly to their managers when they can’t do extra work
Image credits: Ketut Subiyanto / pexels (not the actual photo)
Why did this whole fiasco take place in the first place? Because the manager wanted the author to work on their days off. At the beginning of their post, the author recounts how another colleague missed a deadline, and the manager asked the OP to work extra hours. What’s more, they even expected the author to work when they were actually on vacation!
The problem is that many employers and managers want employees to make their work a top priority. In reality, very few people actually agree with that, as 72% of workers in the U.S. believe a good work-life balance is crucial.
The author noted correctly in a comment that asking them to work extra hours would be a breach of their contract. There can be a clause in a contract that specifies an employee might need to work extra hours from time to time. However, it doesn’t seem that this was the case here.
Experts say that communication is important in these cases. An employee needs to let their manager know they won’t be able to do the extra work. In this case, the author did communicate that. The main problem here seems to be that the manager couldn’t take ‘no’ for an answer. Not very professional, is it?
People gave the author some advice on what to do next, urging them to speak to a lawyer
Some folks even shared similar stories of employers crossing boundaries
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
I am really not sure whether this is real or not, the OP claims to be from the UK but there are a few things that would seem to contradict that such as some of the terminology used but the most glaring thing is that the OP claimed they couldn't take legal action against the employer as they can't afford the legal fees. In the UK, taking an employer to a tribunal is free, there are no legal fees so claiming they cannot afford to go to tribunal does not make sense
Might be IN UK but not OF UK. We have a hugely international workforce.
Load More Replies...I'm calling BS on this, if it did happen then the OP is flaky and the manager has breached data protection. The OP for not emailing her manager and saying that is they don't receive the exams for second marking by a certain date they would not be able to review (the rule is, if it's not written down, it didn't happen) and secondly if any manager is aware of data protection they wouldn't be sending someone to their home.
Thanks for your input! Data protection is indeed crucial, and the story might have oversights. Let's keep discussing and unpack the finer points. 📘
Load More Replies...Reminds me of when my husband and I were out camping hours away from home and an insurance lady decided to pop by. Knocking on the front door for an wntire hour, taking photos of my property then walking to the backyard and knocking on the back door, taking more photos and illegally trespassing. Oh, her boss was PISSED when we called and had her ob camera for 3 hours wanderong our property and talking to herself. Saying things like "probably ignoring me" "open the door!!!" (She yelled this one many times) and "cant believe these jackasses" she literally circled the house at leaat 5 times, peering through our windows and doing many illegal things. Allll because she assumed we were inside the house ignoring her. oh, the greatest kicker is, she went against policy or whatever by coming to the house instead of calling. She is not supposed to visit properties, its "not her job" -her coworker.
I am really not sure whether this is real or not, the OP claims to be from the UK but there are a few things that would seem to contradict that such as some of the terminology used but the most glaring thing is that the OP claimed they couldn't take legal action against the employer as they can't afford the legal fees. In the UK, taking an employer to a tribunal is free, there are no legal fees so claiming they cannot afford to go to tribunal does not make sense
Might be IN UK but not OF UK. We have a hugely international workforce.
Load More Replies...I'm calling BS on this, if it did happen then the OP is flaky and the manager has breached data protection. The OP for not emailing her manager and saying that is they don't receive the exams for second marking by a certain date they would not be able to review (the rule is, if it's not written down, it didn't happen) and secondly if any manager is aware of data protection they wouldn't be sending someone to their home.
Thanks for your input! Data protection is indeed crucial, and the story might have oversights. Let's keep discussing and unpack the finer points. 📘
Load More Replies...Reminds me of when my husband and I were out camping hours away from home and an insurance lady decided to pop by. Knocking on the front door for an wntire hour, taking photos of my property then walking to the backyard and knocking on the back door, taking more photos and illegally trespassing. Oh, her boss was PISSED when we called and had her ob camera for 3 hours wanderong our property and talking to herself. Saying things like "probably ignoring me" "open the door!!!" (She yelled this one many times) and "cant believe these jackasses" she literally circled the house at leaat 5 times, peering through our windows and doing many illegal things. Allll because she assumed we were inside the house ignoring her. oh, the greatest kicker is, she went against policy or whatever by coming to the house instead of calling. She is not supposed to visit properties, its "not her job" -her coworker.
30
25