So, please, just treat the men around you correctly, and with understanding of them not only as individuals but also as men, whether grown or otherwise but according to their age and status, and spare everyone the posturing. THAT is what is wrong with the world today. It's like eveyone is on reality TV. We saw it coming. Then we forgot that we saw it.

But whether the net result is really one or the other is probably subjective at best, but that's the closest thing that we have to the object that morality attempts to achieve.

(And by "supportive of women and children" I mean specifically "in correct and proper accordance to the moral fad of the era", i.e. moral fashion, which is something completely other and even often quite directly opposed to having an integrated understanding of right and wrong - i.e. what it truly is to suffer and experience loss as well as to gain and have joy - and acting accordingly, which is what morality acutally is. Not the language you use. Not the banner you stand beneath. Not the mob that you align yourself with for some kind of social benefit. But the true understanding of the best and worst of mankind, of experience, and the identification of that as being embodied, all of it, entirely, within you, and all of it, entirely, being put utilised accordingly. And that is also to say that there is no right, no wrong, but there is suffering and there is propsperity and everything you do contributes to a greater or lesser degree to at least one of these two conditions...

that they were villainised and the men of generations previous and continually to this day face the plights that society places upon them while in the meanwhile being patronised and placated with hollow gestures such as this relatively nonsense attempt at encouragement which is in effect little more than the same infantilisation but in disguise are all generated by the same mainstream that BP ultimately represents are, I think, contrary to this disingenuous appeasements something that is truly worthy of introspection by all and by which positivity might actually eventually result.

The neolothic collective mindset of BP has finally caught up and is interpretting what the MGTOW people were being vilainised for years ago already. And they in turn were only reinterpretting what was already pretty well known for a majority of people, yet mainstream society basically swept under the carpet in favour for being seen to be supportive of women and children (burying heads in the sand about the fact that today's men make up one half of yesterday's children in the utmost display of irony). That that movement only a few years ago (and I wasn't one of them but I could sympathise and intuitively understood where they were coming from) could be understood and accurately represented by anyone with an ounce of honesty and modicum of impartiality yet even today is described on Wikipedia to all future generations willing to try to understand their plight as a male as inhernetly mysoginistic because they have resentment for unfair treatment in preference to women, and...

I love how in every pro women roghts post there are twenty misoginistic trolls whining about "we never have nice posts about men". But then when bp makes posts about men they are never here. It is almost as if they dont care about men and only use that as an excuse to attack women... hmm..

Actually, most polls show that women select men based on personality before looks. For men selecting women, it usually goes the other way. However, as far as looks go, they did a survey recently that showed that women actually prefer heavier-set men over male fashion models, as the 'dad bod' denotes stability and experience.