Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

BoredPanda Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Australia’s Wealthiest Tycoon Demands Removal Of Unflattering Double Chin Portrait From Gallery
123

Australia’s Wealthiest Tycoon Demands Removal Of Unflattering Double Chin Portrait From Gallery

ADVERTISEMENT

Gina Rinehart, the richest person in Australia, demanded the take-down of her portrait from the National Gallery of Australia (NGA).

The portrait, which was deemed unflattering by the mining magnate, was created by the acclaimed Archibald Prize-winning Aboriginal artist Vincent Namatjira.

Set to be on display until July 21, the Australian tycoon’s portrait is one of Vincent’s 21 individual portraits that make up a single piece in his exhibition, called “Australia in Colour.”

Gina Rinehart sparked a controversy as she demanded the removal of her portrait from the National Gallery of Australia

Image credits: Quinn Rooney/Getty Images

The piece includes the portraits of the late Queen Elizabeth II, American musician Jimi Hendrix, Australian Aboriginal rights activist Vincent Lingiari, and the former Prime Minister of Australia Scott Morrison hanging alongside the image of Australia’s top billionaire.

The 70-year-old mining heiress approached NGA to have her Vincent-created portrait removed from public display. However, the Canberra gallery refused her request and said it should be left hanging up on the yellow wall of the gallery to foster public debate.

Australia’s wealthiest tycoon said her portrait, made by artist Vincent Namatjira, was unflattering

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: Vincent Namatjira via Tu_4_yu / Twitter

“Since 1973, when the National Gallery acquired Jackson Pollock’s Blue Poles, there has been a dynamic discussion on the artistic merits of works in the national collection, and/or on display at the gallery,” it said.

“We present works of art to the Australian public to inspire people to explore, experience and learn about art,” the statement added.

Gina Rinehart’s portrait hangs alongside those of late Queen Elizabeth II, American musician Jimi Hendrix, and others as part of the artist’s exhibition “Australia in Colour”

The gallery remained resolute in keeping the portrait on display despite receiving complaints not only from Australia’s most wealthy woman but also from individuals connected to her company, Hancock Prospecting, and from athletes her company sponsors.

Vincent addressed the controversy around his paintings that feature world leaders and famed figures in a cartoonish manner.

“I paint the world as I see it,” the artist said, as quoted by news.com.au.

Vincent Namatjira addressed the controversy and said, “People don’t have to like my paintings”

ADVERTISEMENT

“People don’t have to like my paintings, but I hope they take the time to look and think, ‘Why has this Aboriginal bloke painted these powerful people? What is he trying to say?’ I paint people who are wealthy, powerful, or significant – people who have had an influence on this country, and on me personally, whether directly or indirectly, whether for good or for bad,” he continued.

“Some people might not like it, other people might find it funny, but I hope people look beneath the surface and see the serious side too,” he added.

Share on Facebook
Binitha Jacob

Binitha Jacob

Author, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

Working as a writer for Bored Panda offers an added layer of excitement. By afternoon, I'm fully immersed in the whirlwind of celebrity drama, and by evening, I'm navigating through the bustling universe of likes, shares, and clicks. This role not only allows me to delve into the fascinating world of pop culture but also lets me do what I love: weave words together and tell other people's captivating stories to the world

Read less »
Binitha Jacob

Binitha Jacob

Author, BoredPanda staff

Working as a writer for Bored Panda offers an added layer of excitement. By afternoon, I'm fully immersed in the whirlwind of celebrity drama, and by evening, I'm navigating through the bustling universe of likes, shares, and clicks. This role not only allows me to delve into the fascinating world of pop culture but also lets me do what I love: weave words together and tell other people's captivating stories to the world

What do you think ?
Add photo comments
POST
Joey Jo Jo Shabadoo
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I find them all sort of awful. But it seems like that was the intention, to do something garish and cartoonish. I mean, the Queen was not buck-toothed, thats a caricature of an inbred English royal

Load More Replies...
Ms.GB
Community Member
5 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think her portrait is hilarious 😂 😃 "I paint the world how I see it." Is such a wicked burn, I'm guessing he doesn't like her much!

Mike F
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

If you don't like the reflection don't look into the mirror... Priceless!

Load More Replies...
Gustav Gallifrey
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It should be noted that people in Australia are mercilessly taking the p**s out of Gina for her demand, with parodies (Gina's 'portrait' face Photoshopped onto all sorts of other pictures) appearing everywhere.

Ripley
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Oh, we really are. She is such a garbage human - I think the portrait is perfect.

Load More Replies...
Upstaged75
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

He makes everyone look ugly! I'm guessing on purpose. Or he's just a really bad artist. ;)

LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The artist apparently often uses satire in his works. I read an interview/article that said he often "takes aim at the rich, white and privileged – with status-puncturing irreverence."

Load More Replies...
Rayne OfSalt
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Gina Reinhart is an awful lump of garbage human being, and that painting is an accurate representation of her.

theoneandonlynoira
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

To understand the kind of person she is: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-09-05/rinehart-says-aussie-workers-overpaid-unproductive/4243866 Here she calls for Australian pay to "be more competitive" with Africans earning $2 a day. https://www.latimes.com/business/la-xpm-2012-aug-30-la-fi-mo-richest-woman-20120830-story.html Here she says the poor should work harder and have less fun to become millionaires like her, who inherited her wealth. https://www.afr.com/work-and-careers/leaders/rinehart-calls-for-tax-cuts-criticises-renewables-and-eyesore-solar-panels-20231215-p5err5 Here's her demanding tax cuts and hating on renewables and solar. Let us just say she seems like the sort who would actually take offense at a caricature.

Bob Jones
Community Member
5 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The pupose of a portrait is to represent the subject. She is a nasty person and this represents her well

Sergio Bicerra
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder but... I just don't like them. I found the ghanaian movie posters much better.

ginshun
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

My guess is that it was not intended to be flattering - lol

ADZ
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Gina the Hutt. Horrid human and has a surprisingly large menagerie of politicians she owns.

Carole G.
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Artist interpretation. Actually, many of the subjects may feel they are not well represented in this (if they'd been asked) however I do appreciate the artist's technique. I like it.

Giraffy Window
Community Member
5 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's completely fine to hate an art style, I find these works quite ugly, and I'd be happy to never have to look at them again. But there's a huge difference between ugly/bad art and unskilled art, and it's very clear which people don't know enough about it to recognize that.

T5n
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

When will people learn that when you call attention to something, more people see it? More people have seen it now than if she didn’t try to get it removed.

Id row
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I can't believe that guy is considered a talented artist worthy of gallery showings. It's like if someone with schizophrenia painted Annie Wilkes from Misery. It's not art, it's a train wreck.

Giraffy Window
Community Member
5 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Why specifically a schizophrenic person? Are people with schizophrenia known to be markedly less talented at painting than people without schizophrenia? I don't think you can paint a whole neurological disorder in a single stroke like that. Those who boldly claim a noted artist lacks talent, however, often do tend to fall more or less into the same category of "Not an Artist."

Load More Replies...
M Kovacs
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think the artist is either a bad painter or taking the p**s. She doesn't look like that.

Sunshine Lady
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I would do the same in her situation. Sorry, but it's too ugly. I don't like his style to be honest.

Judes
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

She didn't comission the portrait, so she really has no say in where it hangs. If she wanted to get rid of it, then she should have quietly bought it instead of demanding the gallery take it down.

Load More Replies...
Uncle Schmickle
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's a bloody awful portrait, as are all the others. However the Gallery has the right to display them. I wonder if Vincent is related to that wonderful and celebrated Aboriginal artist Albert Namatjira ? HE knew how to paint.

lupo mulder
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

if she want it removed she has money enough to buy it and keep it private

ynyrhydref56
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think you'd be hard pressed to find ONE member of the Australian public who is on Gina's side in this.

JB
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I love how her attempts to hide it have resulted in international attention. Now whenever someone Googles her name, it'll come up! You might be rich but you ain't smart!

Margaret Shannon
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think it an excellent likeness, except the artist omitted the smeared eyeliner. Has Gina not heard of primer?

David Leick
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

She could buy the painting and be done with it. But instead, she made herself a household name.

ADZ
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

A significant Trump donor by the way despite having no direct American interests. She actually supports him for his anti equality and environmental destruction.

anarkzie
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It reminds me of that Ronaldo statue from a few years back.

Simba
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Don't worry. She's got all the money to get her lawyers to take it down.

Adrian
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Freedom of speech is not being imprisoned or killed for one's expression. But it doesn't need to be in a national gallery. She has a point!

John Harrison
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Reading through this comment section, it seems that folks that would otherwise denounce shaming people for their appearance are perfectly fine with it when they dont like that person. Smh. No, this painting does NOT reflect this woman's character. Simply having a double chin or uneven eyes does NOT mean you're a bad person. A person's appearance is NOT related to their character ... period.

9 animals and counting
Community Member
5 months ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Why is this art? My 10-year-old niece could do better than this. This is garbage.

Alewa
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I assure you that she can not. Just because the facial features are distorted and the painting is not aesthetically pleasing doesn't mean it was done without skill.

Load More Replies...
G A
Community Member
5 months ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Not quite sure why he portrayed her as someone with dwarfism and obesity? Cruel although she's not a pleasant person apparently. He really is a c**p artist though. Like someone said, a six year old could do better.

Rayne OfSalt
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

She is short, obese, and a terrible person who comes from a long line of terrible people.

Load More Replies...
Sanne
Community Member
5 months ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

This goes to show that as long as you have a nice story (and are part of a minority), everything is art. These paintings are objectively ugly. Every 12 year old can make this. This is what starting painters make before they actually learn to paint. It's ridiculous and embarrassing that this is called art. I can totally see why she wants the painting removed.

LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Do you also think that it's "ridiculous and embarrassing" that Jackson Pollock's work is called "art"? How about Picasso's works? Are they "ridiculous and embarrassing" as well? They're no more realistic than Vincent Namatjira's work. I don't think him being aboriginal or "part of a minority" has anything to do with the fact that his works are exhibited.

Load More Replies...
Dee Tag
Community Member
5 months ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Yet again, a woman says no and her No was ignored. Once again a woman has to just play nice whilst her feelings are discarded. It's her likeness and she said no. End of.

Joey Jo Jo Shabadoo
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I find them all sort of awful. But it seems like that was the intention, to do something garish and cartoonish. I mean, the Queen was not buck-toothed, thats a caricature of an inbred English royal

Load More Replies...
Ms.GB
Community Member
5 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think her portrait is hilarious 😂 😃 "I paint the world how I see it." Is such a wicked burn, I'm guessing he doesn't like her much!

Mike F
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

If you don't like the reflection don't look into the mirror... Priceless!

Load More Replies...
Gustav Gallifrey
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It should be noted that people in Australia are mercilessly taking the p**s out of Gina for her demand, with parodies (Gina's 'portrait' face Photoshopped onto all sorts of other pictures) appearing everywhere.

Ripley
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Oh, we really are. She is such a garbage human - I think the portrait is perfect.

Load More Replies...
Upstaged75
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

He makes everyone look ugly! I'm guessing on purpose. Or he's just a really bad artist. ;)

LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The artist apparently often uses satire in his works. I read an interview/article that said he often "takes aim at the rich, white and privileged – with status-puncturing irreverence."

Load More Replies...
Rayne OfSalt
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Gina Reinhart is an awful lump of garbage human being, and that painting is an accurate representation of her.

theoneandonlynoira
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

To understand the kind of person she is: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-09-05/rinehart-says-aussie-workers-overpaid-unproductive/4243866 Here she calls for Australian pay to "be more competitive" with Africans earning $2 a day. https://www.latimes.com/business/la-xpm-2012-aug-30-la-fi-mo-richest-woman-20120830-story.html Here she says the poor should work harder and have less fun to become millionaires like her, who inherited her wealth. https://www.afr.com/work-and-careers/leaders/rinehart-calls-for-tax-cuts-criticises-renewables-and-eyesore-solar-panels-20231215-p5err5 Here's her demanding tax cuts and hating on renewables and solar. Let us just say she seems like the sort who would actually take offense at a caricature.

Bob Jones
Community Member
5 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The pupose of a portrait is to represent the subject. She is a nasty person and this represents her well

Sergio Bicerra
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder but... I just don't like them. I found the ghanaian movie posters much better.

ginshun
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

My guess is that it was not intended to be flattering - lol

ADZ
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Gina the Hutt. Horrid human and has a surprisingly large menagerie of politicians she owns.

Carole G.
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Artist interpretation. Actually, many of the subjects may feel they are not well represented in this (if they'd been asked) however I do appreciate the artist's technique. I like it.

Giraffy Window
Community Member
5 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's completely fine to hate an art style, I find these works quite ugly, and I'd be happy to never have to look at them again. But there's a huge difference between ugly/bad art and unskilled art, and it's very clear which people don't know enough about it to recognize that.

T5n
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

When will people learn that when you call attention to something, more people see it? More people have seen it now than if she didn’t try to get it removed.

Id row
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I can't believe that guy is considered a talented artist worthy of gallery showings. It's like if someone with schizophrenia painted Annie Wilkes from Misery. It's not art, it's a train wreck.

Giraffy Window
Community Member
5 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Why specifically a schizophrenic person? Are people with schizophrenia known to be markedly less talented at painting than people without schizophrenia? I don't think you can paint a whole neurological disorder in a single stroke like that. Those who boldly claim a noted artist lacks talent, however, often do tend to fall more or less into the same category of "Not an Artist."

Load More Replies...
M Kovacs
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think the artist is either a bad painter or taking the p**s. She doesn't look like that.

Sunshine Lady
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I would do the same in her situation. Sorry, but it's too ugly. I don't like his style to be honest.

Judes
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

She didn't comission the portrait, so she really has no say in where it hangs. If she wanted to get rid of it, then she should have quietly bought it instead of demanding the gallery take it down.

Load More Replies...
Uncle Schmickle
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's a bloody awful portrait, as are all the others. However the Gallery has the right to display them. I wonder if Vincent is related to that wonderful and celebrated Aboriginal artist Albert Namatjira ? HE knew how to paint.

lupo mulder
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

if she want it removed she has money enough to buy it and keep it private

ynyrhydref56
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think you'd be hard pressed to find ONE member of the Australian public who is on Gina's side in this.

JB
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I love how her attempts to hide it have resulted in international attention. Now whenever someone Googles her name, it'll come up! You might be rich but you ain't smart!

Margaret Shannon
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think it an excellent likeness, except the artist omitted the smeared eyeliner. Has Gina not heard of primer?

David Leick
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

She could buy the painting and be done with it. But instead, she made herself a household name.

ADZ
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

A significant Trump donor by the way despite having no direct American interests. She actually supports him for his anti equality and environmental destruction.

anarkzie
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It reminds me of that Ronaldo statue from a few years back.

Simba
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Don't worry. She's got all the money to get her lawyers to take it down.

Adrian
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Freedom of speech is not being imprisoned or killed for one's expression. But it doesn't need to be in a national gallery. She has a point!

John Harrison
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Reading through this comment section, it seems that folks that would otherwise denounce shaming people for their appearance are perfectly fine with it when they dont like that person. Smh. No, this painting does NOT reflect this woman's character. Simply having a double chin or uneven eyes does NOT mean you're a bad person. A person's appearance is NOT related to their character ... period.

9 animals and counting
Community Member
5 months ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Why is this art? My 10-year-old niece could do better than this. This is garbage.

Alewa
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I assure you that she can not. Just because the facial features are distorted and the painting is not aesthetically pleasing doesn't mean it was done without skill.

Load More Replies...
G A
Community Member
5 months ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Not quite sure why he portrayed her as someone with dwarfism and obesity? Cruel although she's not a pleasant person apparently. He really is a c**p artist though. Like someone said, a six year old could do better.

Rayne OfSalt
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

She is short, obese, and a terrible person who comes from a long line of terrible people.

Load More Replies...
Sanne
Community Member
5 months ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

This goes to show that as long as you have a nice story (and are part of a minority), everything is art. These paintings are objectively ugly. Every 12 year old can make this. This is what starting painters make before they actually learn to paint. It's ridiculous and embarrassing that this is called art. I can totally see why she wants the painting removed.

LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Do you also think that it's "ridiculous and embarrassing" that Jackson Pollock's work is called "art"? How about Picasso's works? Are they "ridiculous and embarrassing" as well? They're no more realistic than Vincent Namatjira's work. I don't think him being aboriginal or "part of a minority" has anything to do with the fact that his works are exhibited.

Load More Replies...
Dee Tag
Community Member
5 months ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Yet again, a woman says no and her No was ignored. Once again a woman has to just play nice whilst her feelings are discarded. It's her likeness and she said no. End of.

You May Like
Related on Bored Panda
Related on Bored Panda
Trending on Bored Panda
Also on Bored Panda