Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
User submission
2.3K
Artist Imagines How History’s Most Famous Painters Might Decorate Their Homes Based On The Color Pallettes Of Their Paintings
While artists love to take inspiration from the world to create breathtaking works of art, digital artist and interior designer Amaliya Brenneman decided to flip the script, using four of the most famous paintings ever created as inspiration for her interior designs. She wondered how history’s most celebrated painters, including Vincent Van Gogh, Leonardo da Vinci, Edvard Munch, and Salvador Dali, might decorate the insides of their homes based on the color palettes of their most cherished works.
Amaliya, in collaboration with Angi.com, used some of the most recognizable paintings the world has ever seen to recreate home interiors utilizing the same color schemes and aesthetics presented in the works of art.
RELATED:
Vincent Van Gogh: ‘The Starry Night’
Image credits: Angi.com
Salvador Dali: ‘The Persistence of Memory’
Image credits: Angi.com
Leonardo da Vinci: ‘Mona Lisa’
Image credits: Angi.com
Edvard Munch: ‘The Scream’
Image credits: Angi.com
2Kviews
Share on Facebook
What do you think ?
Sarjana Lastname 3 years ago (edited)
Peole who buy and sell these look like idiots. They dont understand painting at all, where Van Gogh shold be hanging at wall... what effect would be. How funny looking place it has been where painting has been painted, how is has look like. How painting looks there in that room, in that time and please, when everything is in vivid colors, houses clumsy and furniture simple . Flowers and nature is similar, colorful slightly wilt, in hot sun .... also whether makes mark in "style"( even it is kind of realism just exacerbated ) hot whether makes air wave (you know that this natural phenomenon example near by fire) and it shows in paintings.
Sarjana Lastname 3 years ago (edited)
Only Munch is IN period of time, room is art deco style and painting is expressionism from end of 1800 ... other interiors are pure imagination from second millennium and painting glued on the top. Irritating. Van Gogh has been painted interiors and paintings are to that interior. At south Europe they were using bright colors, and painting are giving image from simple life, lower classes, tradition was this: vivid colors, similar than how people in south America, Africa and south Asia are using colors still, complementary colored walls and brush painting .... not his design madness who are buying those painting nowadays. Imagine Van Gogh to south Spain to countryside cottage, where it has been painted, similar room what is in painting, then whole room start look like drawing, houses and furniture has been clumsy. Van Gogh has only cleared amusing atmosphere, exacerbated time and please in he's paintings. OBS! Huge contrast between artist aims, portrayal of world view to here where we are now images from simple countryside life, images from time obviously from poverty are hanging rich mans wall.
Sarjana Lastname 3 years ago (edited)
Has to ask are rich buying those as trophy, celebrating poor artist is used as market power at 2000. Markets has won culture to them selves from poor people, is thories about this phenomenon, and it is about appropriation ... when you look thing from art point of view: revolutionary artist has made so big mark, end and start point to fine art that images can be considerably priceless. Like any other remarkably culturally important art is, there is no sum of money what would match whit idea and work.....no one can valuate thoughts, what art is, art is pure thinking, materialized thought. Decorations and design is so much lower than any great art, design can be valuated by money it can be copied, reproduced only (28 / 5000 Translation results) the number of pieces can be determined .... it is only design if it isn't art unique, exceptional, individual, how you determine art work .... doesn't make sense to valuate art in same principles than objects in general, design or antiques and pay and sell it by using money as currency, it beyond all that, marked, much more than market powers what are impersonal. Similar thing than archaeological objects, what cant be reproduced anymore what dont have clear ownership, some nations dont even exist anymore
Load More Replies... Sarjana Lastname 3 years ago (edited)
Peole who buy and sell these look like idiots. They dont understand painting at all, where Van Gogh shold be hanging at wall... what effect would be. How funny looking place it has been where painting has been painted, how is has look like. How painting looks there in that room, in that time and please, when everything is in vivid colors, houses clumsy and furniture simple . Flowers and nature is similar, colorful slightly wilt, in hot sun .... also whether makes mark in "style"( even it is kind of realism just exacerbated ) hot whether makes air wave (you know that this natural phenomenon example near by fire) and it shows in paintings.
Sarjana Lastname 3 years ago (edited)
Only Munch is IN period of time, room is art deco style and painting is expressionism from end of 1800 ... other interiors are pure imagination from second millennium and painting glued on the top. Irritating. Van Gogh has been painted interiors and paintings are to that interior. At south Europe they were using bright colors, and painting are giving image from simple life, lower classes, tradition was this: vivid colors, similar than how people in south America, Africa and south Asia are using colors still, complementary colored walls and brush painting .... not his design madness who are buying those painting nowadays. Imagine Van Gogh to south Spain to countryside cottage, where it has been painted, similar room what is in painting, then whole room start look like drawing, houses and furniture has been clumsy. Van Gogh has only cleared amusing atmosphere, exacerbated time and please in he's paintings. OBS! Huge contrast between artist aims, portrayal of world view to here where we are now images from simple countryside life, images from time obviously from poverty are hanging rich mans wall.
Sarjana Lastname 3 years ago (edited)
Has to ask are rich buying those as trophy, celebrating poor artist is used as market power at 2000. Markets has won culture to them selves from poor people, is thories about this phenomenon, and it is about appropriation ... when you look thing from art point of view: revolutionary artist has made so big mark, end and start point to fine art that images can be considerably priceless. Like any other remarkably culturally important art is, there is no sum of money what would match whit idea and work.....no one can valuate thoughts, what art is, art is pure thinking, materialized thought. Decorations and design is so much lower than any great art, design can be valuated by money it can be copied, reproduced only (28 / 5000 Translation results) the number of pieces can be determined .... it is only design if it isn't art unique, exceptional, individual, how you determine art work .... doesn't make sense to valuate art in same principles than objects in general, design or antiques and pay and sell it by using money as currency, it beyond all that, marked, much more than market powers what are impersonal. Similar thing than archaeological objects, what cant be reproduced anymore what dont have clear ownership, some nations dont even exist anymore
Load More Replies...
Related on Bored Panda
25
5