I read and she didn't say that. She mocked Scotland's police idea to record rapes by offenders with male genitalia as being committed by a woman if the attacker “identifies as a female”, regardless if the rapist has transitioned or not. So basically any rapist could self-proclaim himself as woman upon conviction, leading him to be trialed and jailed as a woman - which is absurd

I did a bit of research on this... This whole thing started when Rowling openly supported a woman named Maya Forstater after said woman was fired over transphobic tweets and who lost a court case trying to claim that biological sex was the only way to define sex (ie. the old "male/female at birth" binary). Instead of backing down, Rowling instead doubled down on the "binary biological sex" nonsense even as the scientific community was actively discovering that "biological sex" is about as far from strictly binary as can be. Like it or not, the "binary biological sex" argument is regularly weaponized against the transgender community as an excuse to invalidate us. That's why it's upsetting when she touts that.

Maya Forstater won her appeal recently. She first said that she was worried that a radical change in the legal definition of a "woman" (to include both biological women and biological men) could harm biological women, in terms of rights and security. Her main concern is that "most of" transgender women have a penis. Then she went on and said that biological males cannot be women, and that only biology defines what a woman is, not identity or "feelings". What was a stake is, can you get fired for expressing that you don't believe in gender theory? The answer of UK labour law is No. So you get to a point where some Trans activists morons believe that replacing the term "woman" by "people who menstruate" or "people with uterus" is dot dehumanizing at all, and transphobic radical feminist morons who believe "PeNiS = MEn, IF U no VAginA U No WOman" enter a piss contest, to the detriment of all women

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

I have read what she said and it's not that at all. She has not explicitly stated anything of the sort and you people keep twisting her words because she's not toeing the party line.

I've read what she wrote, and she has an unnecessary obsession with trans women and an unwarranted paranoia about trans rights disrupting cis women's rights when no such thing is happening. No one at any point has claimed that sex isn't real, as she claims. Trans men are not being misled into transitioning and then detransitioning in droves, as she claims. The existence of trans women is not eroding "femaleness," as she claims. (I'm a cis woman, and I don't even know what the f**k that means.) Trans women are not attacking cis women in freaking bathrooms, as she claims. She also has made herself a "victim" of trans activists, centering herself in a discussion that she willingly inserted herself into and that was NEVER ABOUT HER to begin with. But poor JK, interjecting her opinions that no one asked for and having people respond them! Who would have ever thought trans people would *gasp* voice their unhappiness with her transphobia! It's unthinkable! Poor thing is such a martyr!😫 She is a textbook definition of a TERF, plain and simple.

Not wanting to have sex with her isn’t necessarily transphobic. Calling her a “dude” definitely is

Me not wanting to date someone with a vagina doesn't make me transphobic...it makes me straight. I am not attracted to vaginas. I do not want to have sex with vaginas. It's a pity that it's something I can't get past so a man with a vagina is off the table for me, but it certainly doesn't make me transphobic.

Yes ...being into guys makes me straight. So if said guy I'm into pulls down his pants and there's a vagina, is it really a surprise it's a mood killer for me? It doesn't make said guy any less a guy, but it makes me a lot less attracted to him. I am still straight. He is still a guy. We are simply mismatched in attraction.

That's not how sexual attraction works. It's based on biological sex, not whatever set of characteristics society says make a woman/man.

It's generally based on hormones more than physical attributes. Which sadly is not widely taught or accepted, leading to the famous "trans panic" excuse when a man is attracted to a trans woman and commits violence against her when he realizes that she's differently equipped than what he was expecting. The attraction was real, the panic was socially induced.

Authority to support this? Or is it how you think it should be?

Shut up. You're so wrong and dumb you don't even know what the hell you're saying. Absolute trash for these lies you made up so called truth monster. How ironic considering all you do is lie and make everything up you say