This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Part 3 Keeping with her line of BS about how she doesn’t talk about her life or her personal stuff at work, she immediately contradicts herself again and says that she was talking with her coworkers about relationships. And she mentioned that she had never cheated… after letting it slip that her coworker knew about her boyfriend; and knew nothing about anyone else. This gives Ken every right to say that she falsely presented herself as being in a monogamous relationship. Because she did. It also gives Ken every right to see her as a hypocrite because she just openly told her coworkers that she never cheated; while appearing to cheat. In public.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Part 4 I already mentioned that it is not bizarre for Ken to take pictures of an adult in a public place who is engaging in attention seeking behavior. Especially when this lady is presenting herself as a woman who has such strong boundaries that she doesn’t seek attention. Maybe she just accidentally told Ken that she had a boyfriend and accidentally lied by omission… because it accidentally serves the purpose of her not being in her integrity in order to align with a status quo that gives her social leverage at her place of work. Leverage that is born on the back of gaslighting Ken. Leverage that resulted in a promotion. Because I can’t think that she’s really good at her job if she’s too stupid to catch herself contradicting herself all over this Reddit piece. I mean, how good can she be? She’s good at rallying the troops. She’s good at being manipulative. It worked on her coworkers. And it’s working on all of you.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Part 5 Of course there is a possibility that Ken is a creep. Of course there’s a small possibility that he’s a little bit too nosy for his own good. I’m thinking that it’s more of a possibility that Ken overestimated the emotional intelligence of his coworkers. Ken also underestimated how HR will take any side that covers their derrières. Ken was foolish to keep these pictures on his work computer. But he probably did so because he was incensed by what a fraud this woman is and how successful she is at doing it. And I’m thinking that if you think a little bit more deeply about this, a person who is hell-bent on saving proof of a woman’s repeated successful hypocrisies, will probably save proof on a work computer because it has everything to do with his job. And her promotion. Because this woman won’t stop. She’s already conned all of you on Reddit and board panda and whatever other website that panders to people who want to join the wrong bandwagon.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Part 6 The only way that I would ever become foolish enough to start saving proof of my coworkers hypocrisy on my work computer is if I was building a case against them because they had identified me as a person they could use. And my job is at risk. None of y’all are even questioning the promotion that she kind of seemed a little aware of. She thought that the cold shoulder was because people were jealous of her promotion? Or is she aware that she’s so full of BS that her promotion was probably a result of her throwing Ken under the bus professionally?

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Part 7 I find it strange that you speculated about him just being some sort of InCell without speculating on the contradictions that are right in front of your face, written in her own words, with a smug tone, to boot. 👏🙀

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Part 8 Occam’s Razor - Google it. “ The proof is in the pudding.” Google it. Her contradictions were written by her and peddled by her. You don’t need to believe me. But you certainly can’t call this an opinion, on my part. The fact is in her narrative and it is right there for you to check. Go on and check it.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Part 9 Do you think that a person who openly contradicts herself and pedals BS on a public forum is going to catch them self messing up at work? Probably not. Do you think that a person who pretends to be in a conventional relationship is not using social leverage at work as a substitution for the inconsistencies that they “accidentally” do all over the place? Probably not. Do you think that a woman who doesn’t tell her coworkers about her life tells her coworker Ken, a lie about her life? YEP! She’s BEYOND “the A??hole.” She’s a cold, manipulative person who sniffs out the person of integrity, piggybacks on his work, gets his promotion, and then finishes up the job by getting him fired and getting all of you and all of her coworkers to rally behind her. The proof is in the pudding. The pudding is her words AND how it all turned out. She lied - To all of you, about what she tells her coworkers; and Ken, about what kind of relationship she was in.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Part 10 It’s not creepy or stalkerish for an adult to take a picture of another adult who is acting out in attention-seeking ways in a public place. (BTW, I am all for making out at a bar. People have taken pictures of me doing it. But I didn’t rally for attention, turn people against that person, or get them fired. Because I’m not “the A-hole”). Especially when Ken was deliberately led to believe that she only had a boyfriend. I keep mentioning these things over and over again because - it takes a lot of facts to get people to not commit to their need for drama and easily received feelings of heroism and togetherness. She pretended like she was the victim of stalking? It’s easier to bond with others in this way if you don’t have any maturity or confidence in your social skills. So you keep on taking all the opportunities you see to speculate about Ken being a loser; while showing zero embarrassment about how many obvious signs you missed about her being a dangerous person.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Part 11 Like a true fake victim, a true manipulator, and a person who “accidentally” uses her personality disorder(s) in dangerous ways… she ends her Parade of BS by asking - “AITA for not telling my coworkers that I’m poly and subsequently laughing in their faces?”

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Part 12 No. You are BEYOND “the A-hole” by… Falsely presenting to Ken that you were in a monogamous relationship with one person. Falsely presenting to the public that you did not reveal your relationship status to coworkers. Falsely presenting to all of us that you don’t reveal a lot about your personal life; while letting us know that you were openly talking about how you had never cheated; which reveals personal information about all of your relationships. To coworkers. LIKE U JUST SAID U DON’T DO. UR “the A-hole” For being so used to contradicting yourself that you couldn’t help but contradict yourself all over this narrative in a public forum. For seeking so much attention that you wrecked a man’s job and still were not satisfied; so you thought more attention from this piece by taking it to a public forum; as if humiliating him and getting all your coworkers aside wasn’t enough.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Part 13 She is the a hole because she laughed in her coworkers faces to both buy time to come up with a line of BS and to shock them. This is a basic move committed by people who are dangerous and manipulative. They laugh in bizarre ways during bizarre situations when they are confronted in order to shock people, throw them off a little, and buy time. Why did she need to throw ya’ll off? So she could quickly slide BS to you about an exaggerated description of stalker behavior, which appeals to really insecure and immature people who are so insecure about their abilities to socially connect that they become opportunists and they joined the bandwagon of the biggest bully. Frauds, mean girls and Despots do it ALL. Of. The. Time. Because it works. But only around groups of people who default to lazy thinking, immaturity, and deep harbored fears about their social status in a certain environment. It appeals to your opportunism, the exploitive kind. Which is something that you share with this a*****e. Which is why you will pretend to be confused and you will pick the easiest thing and say things like “why did you leave 13 comments psycho?” This is all so predictable. And so obvious. Keep on showing us who you are. Just like she does. No, you probably don’t have a personality disorder. And mini with personality disorders choose to not be dangerous. But you supporting a dangerous person makes you dangerous. And a tool of the a hole. But, on this site and on Reddit, you’re in good company. Your tribe of a whole supporters are with you👊

13 parts , really? Why do you care so much? The world is so glad that you took the time to weigh in and judge.

I think we found Ken -- I mean, he made a Bored Panda account just to write that magnum opus

Chill out, Ken.