“Ridiculous”: 63-Year-Old Woman “Humiliated” After She’s Kicked Out Of Bar Over Her Face Tattoos
InterviewAn Australian woman claimed she experienced the “humiliating” refusal to enter a popular waterside venue due to her face tattoos. The establishment defended itself by stating its policies were put in place for the safety of its clients. Becky Holt, AKA “Britain’s most tattooed woman,” has since exclusively reacted to the incident, sharing her own negative experience.
- A 63-year-old woman was refused entry to a hotel due to her face tattoos.
- The Colley Hotel defended its policy as necessary for client safety.
- Facial tattoos must be covered unless they hold religious or cultural significance.
- Becky Holt, 'Britain's most tattooed woman,' relates to the discrimination.
Kerrie Ashby attempted to enter the Colley Hotel in South Australia with a friend on Sunday (October 13) when a manager barred her and her friend from coming in.
The 63-year-old woman told News.com.au on Wednesday (October 16): “The staff were looking at us — I am used to people looking at me and it doesn’t bother me.
“But when I asked for the menu [ …] Security was standing behind me and the manager said I was being refused entry because the owners have a policy against facial tattoos.”
An Australian woman claimed she experienced the “humiliating” refusal to enter a popular waterside venue due to her face tattoos
Image credits: Salty Locs – Dreadlocks Adelaide
Image credits: Salty Locs – Dreadlocks Adelaide
After struggling with alopecia, causing her to lose a significant amount of hair, Kerrie got a mandala tattoo along her hairline and a sea creature design on her neck for her 60th birthday.
Kerrie further recalled: “It was a bit of a shock to my character to be refused entry. I was gobsmacked.
“I wasn’t angry, I felt a bit humiliated. It was so unwarranted and unjustified. It’s not a reasonable cause.
“I dress well. I’m not troublesome. I am always respectful and I’m well-known in Glenelg. I was just really shocked.”
The establishment defended itself by stating its policies were put in place for the safety of its clients
Image credits: Salty Locs – Dreadlocks Adelaide
Image credits: Salty Locs – Dreadlocks Adelaide
According to Kerrie, Colley Hotel’s policy is impossible to enforce, noting that some people have tattooed eyebrows, eyeliner, and lip liner.
A spokesperson for the venue subsequently told the Advertiser that pubgoers were allowed to have facial tattoos if they either covered them up or had religious or cultural significance.
They said: “We totally respect personal expression, tattoos – a lot of our staff have tattoos – and we embrace body art, especially body art that reflects cultural significance, individuality.
“We just ask that neck, face tattoos be covered along with anything that may be aggressive or explicit in the same way that some people might have colorful language on their knuckles.
“So our policy is in place to ensure that all of our guests, community members, and families feel safe.”
Kerrie Ashby attempted to enter the Colley Hotel in South Australia with a friend on Sunday (October 13) when a manager barred her
Image credits: thecolleyhotel
A Facebook message seemingly sent by the Colley Hotel to Kerrie, which she subsequently shared on social media, read: “The dress code at the Colley Hotel is clean, tidy, and respectful.
“No intimidating, aggressive, or offensive tattoos or clothing are permitted. Please note that persons with facial tattoos are not permitted to enter the ven.”
Kerrie slammed claims that her facial tattoos could be associated with “gang activity” as she wrote on Facebook on Monday (October 14): “ I’m well known in my community and not involved in anything that this Hotel has a problem with.”
Image credits: Salty Locs – Dreadlocks Adelaide
She added: “It’s a very discriminating policy and excluding individuals that have collectively been placed in a stereotypical group.
“I have facial tattoos because I can and love them. They are neither aggressive nor offensive.
“Tired of stupidity in this world. Just ban specific persons, not specific groups, none of which I belong to, except that I have facial tattoos.”
According to Becky Holt, also known as “Britain’s most tattooed woman,” discrimination based on a person’s permanent body ink art isn’t uncommon.
She told Bored Panda on Wednesday: “I have faced rejection and it’s not a nice feeling! Such a shame [Kerrie’s] had to deal with this too.”
Becky Holt, AKA “Britain’s most tattooed woman,” has since exclusively reacted to the incident
Image credits: becky_holt__
She recalled: “Me and my friend who has face tattoos were rejected from a restaurant. They tried to tell us they were full, which they very obviously weren’t.
“We just told them they were incredibly rude to judge us and said we didn’t want to spend our money there and went somewhere else.”
When asked how Becky would usually deal with such behavior, she revealed: “I always say, ‘I don’t care that you’re not tattooed so why do you care if I am?’
“People just need to stop being so judgemental because we’ve chosen to cover our bodies in artwork.
Image credits: thecolleyhotel
“It has no impact on anyone else lives so I don’t understand why these people care. Maybe these people should try having a tattoo themselves. Live a little.”
Becky further shared: “It really is a shame that in this day in age, people are still judged for their appearance.
“Tattoos are an art form and a way we express ourselves as humans. It doesn’t make us dirty or badly behaved which is what I’m assuming these hotel owners must think.”
Bored Panda has contacted Colley Hotel for comment.
“It’s not right or fair,” a reader commented
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
We are free to make our own decisions, but we are not free from the consequences of our decisions. I suspect we have all suffered that in one way or another.
To the people saying "their pub, their rules", a person is still allowed to complain about stupid rules. This one definitely fits.
Fair point. I think we all sometimes confuse the legality of something with its "rightness."
Load More Replies...If this policy was on paper BEFORE the woman arrived, the policy was followed. If this policy was on paper AFTER this encounter, it could be viewed as discriminatory.
We are free to make our own decisions, but we are not free from the consequences of our decisions. I suspect we have all suffered that in one way or another.
To the people saying "their pub, their rules", a person is still allowed to complain about stupid rules. This one definitely fits.
Fair point. I think we all sometimes confuse the legality of something with its "rightness."
Load More Replies...If this policy was on paper BEFORE the woman arrived, the policy was followed. If this policy was on paper AFTER this encounter, it could be viewed as discriminatory.
17
42