18th Century Statue Destroyed By A Tourist Taking A Picture In Lisbon Museum
If you hated selfies before, you’re going to go a step beyond hate after you hear about this tourist, who knocked over and destroyed an 18th-century statue while trying to snap a photo of himself.
The statue I’m talking about is the one of Saint Michael that was stationed at the National Museum of Ancient Art in Lisbon. During the free-entrance-Sunday, a Brazilian tourist was trying to snap a selfie and as he was backing off, he knocked the sculpture to the ground, shattering it beyond repair.
Nuno Miguel Rodrigues was on the scene when it happened and managed to snap a photo that quickly went viral on Facebook. The deputy director of the museum Jose Alberto Seabra Carvalho said: “I’ve been working in the museum for many years and cannot recall anything similar happening.“
The identity of the Brazillian tourist is being kept from public as the investigation is still ongoing.
Update: Thanks to our awesome readers, who’ve uncovered the factual mistakes in the article! The photographer wasn’t actually taking a selfie, according to the witnesses he was backing down to take a picture of something else and hit the statue. The museum staff is saying that the restoration is going to be a difficult one, but it should be successful.
Before
After
221Kviews
Share on Facebooki hate selfies. people are so addicted to likes on Facebook, it's just mental illness
I support you, but I think social networks have the same function than years ago that is connect people, the problem is how ppl use them, the culture.
Load More Replies...I wish plague and pestilence on all of the idiot selfie takers in museums... I see you a******s everywhere! At this point I don't care anymore if you walk into a road and get killed by a bus, just don't destroy our heritage, in fact I'd like to help you onto the road...
I wonder what an over-opinionated person thinks though...
Load More Replies...That's not Acceptable! These types of things should never happen! Better security needs too be implemented unfortunately!
And just what kind of security do you propose? One guard per visitor ro physically catch any idiot who stumbles trying to take a selfie? Security and this situation have nothing to do with eachother
Load More Replies...I miss the days when people used to ask other people "Can you take my picture?" . . . and then hand them their camera. (sigh)
i am against selfie trend, just for the record. i think it's stupid.
Load More Replies...I am from there and the issue was and is the lack of funding, hence the lack of staff they where really understaffed, only 20 when it should have been 50 security personnel. Portugal "invests" in the pockets of certain political figures mostly with it's shady deals that ruin the country and the art and culture they rather sell it and buy a porshes, former minister of culture in 2010 something did it.
No ... it's a lack of common sense, decency and courtesy ... anybody with a shred of any of those would have known better than to get too close to a work of art ... that person just had less f***s to give than the average ...
Load More Replies...So basically you got all the facts wrong in this story first time round.
That doesn't excuse the fact that the person was careless and stupid
Load More Replies...I am really surprised there is not a rope around such a piece, and that it was not in some way mounted, securely. In many museums you would not get close enough to be able to touch anything at all, there would be at least a metre surrounding, no go zone. As far as selfies being the cause, he apparently stumbled back. That may have happened in any picture taking situation. Careless maybe, intentional no, and I am sure he is probably mortified, to be in the museum in the first place shows he was interested in such things, that does not scream hooligan.
That was my first thought! It didn't seem to be securely mounted at all! I'm NOT excusing the carelessness of the man who caused this, but the statue being placed on a tall, narrow column like that was a terrible idea
Load More Replies...i thought most museums have a no photographs policy... that is such a cultural loss... priceless
In all fairness, the museum should have gone to much greater lengths to ensure the safety of the statue. That said, selfies are idiotic.
If it was 400 years old it's 4 centuries old. We live in the 21st century. -4 would mean it's 17th century not 18th. Weird part I also read an article about a 126 year old statue of a Portuguese king that was knocked over and that was from the 16th century. Which would have been 500 years ago. So make up your mind! How old are these statues? And please connect them to the right century because this is really not professional.
Hi Ivanka, this is the second statue that was knocked over in Lisbon, this one was in a museum the other, the first to be knocked over, was in the facade of Rossio Train Station
Load More Replies...Trump as president and this post just made today my worst day of 2016. *faith in humanity completely destroyed*
If that's all it takes, then you must not have had much "faith" to begin. If one equates faith with blind trust, that's the problem. Real trust must be earned by others, not given to them freely.
Load More Replies......... was the statue merely resting on the pedestal !!!!!? this might be at least partially the fault of the museum.
Don´t really agree to that....I know the museum and a lot of pieces are protected. This one has pedestal that is wide enough to create a limit. Probably the person fell, and even if it had say an acrilical protection, it would fall anyways
Load More Replies...omg - stop with the selfies. After I read the title of the article, I crossed my fingers and repeated "Please don't be American, please don't be American". Whew.
Part of the fault belongs to the museum. WHY would they put such a rare and fragile piece on display in such an unprotected manner??
WHY is he raking photos in a museum? I though this was not allowed. Just enjoy the ****ing art and leave!
I wonder if the "person" who did this will have to pay any fines or charges?
Why wasn't this statue protected with some kind of a barrier? There are a lot of idiots in this world and this proves it. My opinion is it's the museums fault, sad to say.
Just do what they do at the Cairo museum,keep people's cameras,bags and phones in outside lockers!security cameras will catch the rest.
Couldn't it have been put somewhere safer in the first place? or possibly surrounded with something to prevent people getting too close? Or even put up higher? I'm mystified at this really. A cleaner could just as easily done this....I mean it's valuable right?
Thank goodness it wasn't an American tourist. That would be all we'd need right now to cement our national image abroad.
I work in a museum. Most people are respectful, while some lack complete self-awareness and treat the place like Disneyland- eating, drinking, touching everything, posing endlessly, talking loudly on phones in galleries, and letting their kids run riot and breaking stuff. Museums often don't have enough money to employ one guard or host per visitor - not even per gallery! So what it comes down to is simply respecting the space you're in, and other people around you! There are some real "Me Me Me" types out there!
What a total idiot and vandal, ruining a work of art like that. Museums should keep such tourists away from priceless objects.
This makes me sad...a work of art that survived centuries, destroyed in one fell swoop. The problem isn't phones, it is people's failure to remain aware of their environment while using them.
Look at how that statue was mounted to its pedestal . There wasn't nearly enough contact or insertion of the male part of the pedestal into the female receptor part of the statue. The museum must take most of the blame for this accident for not properly mounting the statue .
The statue was properly mounted, you see the big white then surrounded by the pedestal? You aren't supposed to step onto that for the safety of the artwork, as more tight measures of securing can damage some forms of art.
Load More Replies...Selfies are cancer. You look so ridiculous taking a photograph of yourself. That's what photographers are for. Not every single thing you do needs to be documented. You're not a celebrity and you're not that interesting. People have no mystery anymore :(
there should at least be a glass cage which can house the statue! having it be shattered to pieces is not acceptable!!
How stupid can you be to knock over a priceless piece of art for a freaking selfie hope it was worth and I hope this guy does jail time this is destruction of private property go back to Brazil JERK.
beyond repair? Really, it didn't look beyond repair in the photo. Still, selfies destroy, people.
Its sad to see when modern technology leads to the destruction of parts of humanity’s rich historic past(s). But I guess its not just modern technology, but the advancements in technology that our human brains can’t keep up with. 0.o
Brazilian being Brazilian, he just forgot to take a piece of souvenir.
Load More Replies...and worse of all, this isn't the first time it happens in portugal http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3577177/A-right-royal-mess-Man-s-selfie-126-year-old-statue-16th-century-Portuguese-king-ends-disaster-knocks-smashes-pieces.html
and this is why I hate selfies.....facebook.....and all the other social media c**p that goes with it!!
its weird to see.. that this statue is worth more than a human life... just cuz its 400 yrs old. what about all the people in this world who destroy human lives. It sad tbh.
When Brazilian goes to japan, broke that bridge that resist to a nuclear bomb... what you think? =D
i hate selfies. people are so addicted to likes on Facebook, it's just mental illness
I support you, but I think social networks have the same function than years ago that is connect people, the problem is how ppl use them, the culture.
Load More Replies...I wish plague and pestilence on all of the idiot selfie takers in museums... I see you a******s everywhere! At this point I don't care anymore if you walk into a road and get killed by a bus, just don't destroy our heritage, in fact I'd like to help you onto the road...
I wonder what an over-opinionated person thinks though...
Load More Replies...That's not Acceptable! These types of things should never happen! Better security needs too be implemented unfortunately!
And just what kind of security do you propose? One guard per visitor ro physically catch any idiot who stumbles trying to take a selfie? Security and this situation have nothing to do with eachother
Load More Replies...I miss the days when people used to ask other people "Can you take my picture?" . . . and then hand them their camera. (sigh)
i am against selfie trend, just for the record. i think it's stupid.
Load More Replies...I am from there and the issue was and is the lack of funding, hence the lack of staff they where really understaffed, only 20 when it should have been 50 security personnel. Portugal "invests" in the pockets of certain political figures mostly with it's shady deals that ruin the country and the art and culture they rather sell it and buy a porshes, former minister of culture in 2010 something did it.
No ... it's a lack of common sense, decency and courtesy ... anybody with a shred of any of those would have known better than to get too close to a work of art ... that person just had less f***s to give than the average ...
Load More Replies...So basically you got all the facts wrong in this story first time round.
That doesn't excuse the fact that the person was careless and stupid
Load More Replies...I am really surprised there is not a rope around such a piece, and that it was not in some way mounted, securely. In many museums you would not get close enough to be able to touch anything at all, there would be at least a metre surrounding, no go zone. As far as selfies being the cause, he apparently stumbled back. That may have happened in any picture taking situation. Careless maybe, intentional no, and I am sure he is probably mortified, to be in the museum in the first place shows he was interested in such things, that does not scream hooligan.
That was my first thought! It didn't seem to be securely mounted at all! I'm NOT excusing the carelessness of the man who caused this, but the statue being placed on a tall, narrow column like that was a terrible idea
Load More Replies...i thought most museums have a no photographs policy... that is such a cultural loss... priceless
In all fairness, the museum should have gone to much greater lengths to ensure the safety of the statue. That said, selfies are idiotic.
If it was 400 years old it's 4 centuries old. We live in the 21st century. -4 would mean it's 17th century not 18th. Weird part I also read an article about a 126 year old statue of a Portuguese king that was knocked over and that was from the 16th century. Which would have been 500 years ago. So make up your mind! How old are these statues? And please connect them to the right century because this is really not professional.
Hi Ivanka, this is the second statue that was knocked over in Lisbon, this one was in a museum the other, the first to be knocked over, was in the facade of Rossio Train Station
Load More Replies...Trump as president and this post just made today my worst day of 2016. *faith in humanity completely destroyed*
If that's all it takes, then you must not have had much "faith" to begin. If one equates faith with blind trust, that's the problem. Real trust must be earned by others, not given to them freely.
Load More Replies......... was the statue merely resting on the pedestal !!!!!? this might be at least partially the fault of the museum.
Don´t really agree to that....I know the museum and a lot of pieces are protected. This one has pedestal that is wide enough to create a limit. Probably the person fell, and even if it had say an acrilical protection, it would fall anyways
Load More Replies...omg - stop with the selfies. After I read the title of the article, I crossed my fingers and repeated "Please don't be American, please don't be American". Whew.
Part of the fault belongs to the museum. WHY would they put such a rare and fragile piece on display in such an unprotected manner??
WHY is he raking photos in a museum? I though this was not allowed. Just enjoy the ****ing art and leave!
I wonder if the "person" who did this will have to pay any fines or charges?
Why wasn't this statue protected with some kind of a barrier? There are a lot of idiots in this world and this proves it. My opinion is it's the museums fault, sad to say.
Just do what they do at the Cairo museum,keep people's cameras,bags and phones in outside lockers!security cameras will catch the rest.
Couldn't it have been put somewhere safer in the first place? or possibly surrounded with something to prevent people getting too close? Or even put up higher? I'm mystified at this really. A cleaner could just as easily done this....I mean it's valuable right?
Thank goodness it wasn't an American tourist. That would be all we'd need right now to cement our national image abroad.
I work in a museum. Most people are respectful, while some lack complete self-awareness and treat the place like Disneyland- eating, drinking, touching everything, posing endlessly, talking loudly on phones in galleries, and letting their kids run riot and breaking stuff. Museums often don't have enough money to employ one guard or host per visitor - not even per gallery! So what it comes down to is simply respecting the space you're in, and other people around you! There are some real "Me Me Me" types out there!
What a total idiot and vandal, ruining a work of art like that. Museums should keep such tourists away from priceless objects.
This makes me sad...a work of art that survived centuries, destroyed in one fell swoop. The problem isn't phones, it is people's failure to remain aware of their environment while using them.
Look at how that statue was mounted to its pedestal . There wasn't nearly enough contact or insertion of the male part of the pedestal into the female receptor part of the statue. The museum must take most of the blame for this accident for not properly mounting the statue .
The statue was properly mounted, you see the big white then surrounded by the pedestal? You aren't supposed to step onto that for the safety of the artwork, as more tight measures of securing can damage some forms of art.
Load More Replies...Selfies are cancer. You look so ridiculous taking a photograph of yourself. That's what photographers are for. Not every single thing you do needs to be documented. You're not a celebrity and you're not that interesting. People have no mystery anymore :(
there should at least be a glass cage which can house the statue! having it be shattered to pieces is not acceptable!!
How stupid can you be to knock over a priceless piece of art for a freaking selfie hope it was worth and I hope this guy does jail time this is destruction of private property go back to Brazil JERK.
beyond repair? Really, it didn't look beyond repair in the photo. Still, selfies destroy, people.
Its sad to see when modern technology leads to the destruction of parts of humanity’s rich historic past(s). But I guess its not just modern technology, but the advancements in technology that our human brains can’t keep up with. 0.o
Brazilian being Brazilian, he just forgot to take a piece of souvenir.
Load More Replies...and worse of all, this isn't the first time it happens in portugal http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3577177/A-right-royal-mess-Man-s-selfie-126-year-old-statue-16th-century-Portuguese-king-ends-disaster-knocks-smashes-pieces.html
and this is why I hate selfies.....facebook.....and all the other social media c**p that goes with it!!
its weird to see.. that this statue is worth more than a human life... just cuz its 400 yrs old. what about all the people in this world who destroy human lives. It sad tbh.
When Brazilian goes to japan, broke that bridge that resist to a nuclear bomb... what you think? =D
200
106